A moderate constructivist e-learning instructional model evaluated on computer specialists

Computers and Education

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 57-65

  Alonso, Fernando ^a   Manrique, Daniel ^a   Viñes, José M ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b Aulatika SL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Instructional model; Learning objectives; Moderate constructivism

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; TEACHING;

BLENDED LEARNING; CONSTRUCTIVIST LEARNING THEORY; EVALUATION STUDY; INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL; LEARNING OBJECTIVES; MAINTENANCE EXPENSE; MODERATE CONSTRUCTIVISM; TEACHING/LEARNING;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 64449086600     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alonso F., López G., Manrique D., and Viñes J.M. An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology 1 (2005) 217-235
2. Anderson N.H. A functional theory of cognition (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey
3. Anido, L., Santos, J. (2001). A Component model for standardized web-based education. In paper presented at the 10th international world wide web conference (pp. 86-95). Hong Kong.
4. Ausubel, D., Novak, J., Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5. Berndtsson M. Analyzing course configurations for teaching object-oriented modeling and design. IEEE Transactions on Education 48 2 (2005)
6. Bloom B.S. Taxonomy of educational objectives, book 1, cognitive domain (1956), Longman, New York
7. Brooks J.G., and Brooks M.G. In search of understanding: the case for constructivist classrooms (1993), Association for Supervision and Curriculum, Alexandria, VA
8. Brown, B. M. (1998). Digital classrooms: Some myths about developing new educational programs using the internet. T.H.E. Journal. . Retrieved 16.3.2008.
9. Carman, J. M. (2004). Blended learning design: Five key ingredients. . Retrieved 24.10.2004.
10. Cey T. Moving towards constructivist classrooms (2001), University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
11. Clark R. Building expertise: Cognitive methods for training and performance improvement (1998), International Society for Performance Improvement, Washington, DC
12. Corich S. Instructional Design in the real world: A view from the trenches. Educational Technology & Society 1 (2004) 128-129
13. Donovan M.S., Bransford J.D., and Pellegrino J.W. How people learn: bridging research and practice (1999), National Research Council Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, Washington, DC
14. EL-Deghaidy H., and Nouby A. Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in Egiptian teacher education programme. Computers & Education 51 (2008) 988-1006
15. Ellis H.J.C. An assessment of a self-directed learning approach in a graduate web application design and development course. IEEE Transactions on Education 50 1 (2007) 55-60
16. Felder R.M. Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching 23 5 (1993) 286-290
17. Felder R.M., Solomon, B. (2002). Index of learning styles questionnaire. . Accessed 11.2002.
18. Garrison D.R., and Kanuka H. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education 7 (2004) 95-105
19. Good T.L., and Brophy J.E. Educational psychology: A realistic approach. 4th ed. (1990), White Plains, New York
20. Jonassen D.H. Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?. Educational Technology and Research and Development 39 (1991) 5-14
21. Karagiorgi Y., and Symeou L. Translating constructivism into instructional design: Potential and limitations. Educational Technology & Society 8 1 (2005) 17-27
22. Merrill, M.D. (1996). Instructional strategies that teach. CBT Solutions, November-December (pp. 1-11).
23. Michell, L. (2001). E-Learning methods offer a personalized approach. InfoWorld, April (pp. 174-185).
24. Moreno L., Gonzalez C., Castilla I., Gonzalez E., and Sigut J. Applying a constructivist and collaborative methodological approach in engineering education. Computers & Education 49 3 (2005) 891-915
25. Palloff R., and Pratt K. Building learning communities in cyberspace. Effective strategies for online classroom (1999), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
26. Palloff R., and Pratt K. The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners (2003), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
27. Schulman L.S. Making differences: A table of learning. Change 34 (2002) 36-44
28. Stahl G. Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2 (2005) 79-90
29. Tallent-Runnels M.K., Lan W.Y., Fryer W., Thomas J.A., Cooper S., and Wang K. The relationship between problems with technology and graduate students' evaluations of online teaching. Internet and Higher Education 8 (2005) 167-174
30. Tam M. Constructivism, instructional design and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology & Society 2 (2000) 124-138
31. Thorne K. Blended learning: How to integrate online and traditional learning (2003), Kogan Page, New Jersey
32. Tuckman B.W. Evaluating ADAPT: A hybrid instructional model combining web-based and classroom components. Computers & Education 39 (2002) 261-269