Stress phase angle depicts differences in coronary artery hemodynamics due to changes in flow and geometry after percutaneous coronary intervention

American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology

Volumn 296, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Torii, Ryo ^a   Wood, Nigel B ^a   Hadjiloizou, Nearchos ^b   Dowsey, Andrew W ^a   Wright, Andrew R ^b   Hughes, Alun D ^b   Davies, Justin ^b   Francis, Darrel P ^b   Mayet, Jamil ^b   Yang, Guang Zhong ^a   Thom, Simon A McG ^b   Xu, X Yun ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Atherosclerosis; Computational fluid dynamics; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Stress phase angle; Velocity waveform

Indexed keywords

ENDOTHELIN 1; NITRIC OXIDE;

ARTERY RECONSTRUCTION; ARTERY WALL; ARTICLE; ATHEROGENESIS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; FLOW RATE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MECHANICAL PROBE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECRETION; PULSATILE FLOW; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; SHEAR STRESS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEMODYNAMICS; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; OSCILLOMETRY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TIME; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; OSCILLOMETRY; PULSATILE FLOW; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 64049104274     PISSN: 03636135     EISSN: 15221539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01166.2007     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Asakura T, Karino T. Flow patterns and spatial distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arteries. Circ Res 66: 1045-1066, 1990.
2. Atabek HB, Ling SC, Patel DJ. Analysis of coronary flow fields in thoracotomized dogs. Circ Res 37: 752-761, 1975.
3. Augst AD, Ariff B, Thom SA, Xu XY, Hughes AD. Analysis of complex flow and the relationship between blood pressure, wall shear stress, and intima-media thickness in the human carotid artery. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293: H1031-H1037, 2007.
4. Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC. Arterial wall shear and distribution of early atheroma in man. Nature 223: 1159-1161, 1969.
5. Cheng C, Helderman F, Tempel D, Segers D, Hierck B, Poelmann R, van Tol A, Duncker DJ, Robbers-Visser D, Ursem TCN, van Haperen R, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen F, van der Steen AFW, de Crom R, Krams R. Large variations in absolute wall shear stress levels within one species and between species. Atherosclerosis 195: 225-235, 2007.
6. Dancu MB, Berardi DE, Vanden Heuvel JP, Tarbell JM. Asynchronous shear stress and circumferential strain reduces endothelial NO syn- thase and cyclooxygenase-2 but induces endothelin-1 gene expression in endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24: 2088-2094, 2004.
7. Dancu MB, Berardi DE, Vanden Heuvel JP, Tarbell JM. Atherogenic endothelial cell eNOS and ET-1 responses to asynchronous hemodynamics are mitigated by conjugated linoleic acid. Ann Biomed Eng 35: 1111-1119, 2007.
8. Dancu MB, Tarbell JM. Coronary endothelium expresses a pathologic gene pattern compared to aortic endothelium: correlation of asynchronous hemodynamics and pathology in vivo. Atherosclerosis 192: 9 -14, 2007.
9. Dancu MB, Tarbell JM. Large negative stress phase angle (SPA) attenuates nitric oxide production in bovine aortic endothelial cells. J Biomech Engineer 128: 329-334, 2006.
10. Davies JE, Hadjiloizou N, Leibovich D, Malaweera A, Alastruey- Arimon J, Whinnett ZI, Manisty CH, Francis DP, Aguado-Sierra J, Foale RA, Malik IS, Parker KH, Mayet J, Hughes AD. Importance of the aortic reservoir in determining the shape of the arterial pressure waveform-the forgotten lessons of Frank. Artery Res 1: 40-45, 2007.
11. Davies JE, Whinnett ZI, Francis DP, Manisty CH, Aguado-Sierra J, Willson K, Foale RA, Malik IS, Hughes AD, Parker KH, Mayet J. Evidence of a dominant backward-propagating "suction" wave responsible for diastolic coronary filling in humans, attenuated in left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 113: 1768 -1778, 2006.
12. Dempere-Marco L, Oubel E, Castro M, Putman C, Frangi A, Cebral J. CFD analysis incorporating the influence of wall motion: application to intracranial aneurysms. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Inte 9: 438 -445, 2006.
13. Ethier CR, Steinman DA, Zhang X, Karpik SR, Ojha M. Flow waveform effects on end-to-side anastomotic flow patterns. J Biomech 31: 609-617, 1998.
14. Hadjiloizou N, Davies JE, Malik IS, Aguado-Sierra J, Willson K, Foale RA, Parker KH, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Mayet J. Differences in cardiac microcirculatory wave patterns between the proximal left mainstem and proximal right coronary artery. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295: H1198-H1205, 2008.
15. Haluska BA, Jeffriess L, Mottram PM, Carlier SG, Marwick TH. A new technique for assessing arterial pressure wave forms and central pressure with tissue Doppler. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 5: 6, 2007.
16. Himbirg HA, Dowd SE, Friedman MH. Frequency-dependent response of the vascular endothelium to pulsatile shear stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293: H645-H653, 2007.
17. Holzapfel GA, Stadler M, Gasser TC. Changes in the mechanical environment of stenotic arteries during interaction with stents: computational assessment of parametric stent designs. J Biomech Eng 127: 166-180, 2005.
18. Kleinstreuer C, Lei M, Archie JP Jr. Flow input waveform effects on the temporal and spatial wall shear stress gradients in a femoral graft- artery connector. J Biomech Eng 118: 506 -510, 1996.
19. Ku DN. Blood flow in arteries. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 29: 399-434, 1997.
20. Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low and oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 5: 293-302, 1985.
21. Lieber BB, Giddens DP. Post-stenotic core flow behavior in pulsatile flow and its effects on wall shear stress. J Biomech 23: 597-605, 1990.
22. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 282: 2035-2042, 1999.
23. Myers JG, Moore JA, Ojha M, Johnston KW, Ethier CR. Factors influencing blood flow patterns in the human right coronary artery. Ann Biomed Eng 29: 109-120, 2001.
24. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles. London: Hodder Arnold, 1998.
25. Ofili EO, Kern MJ, Labovitz AJ, St. Vrain JA, Segal J, Aguirre FV, Castello R. Analysis of coronary blood flow velocity dynamics in angio- graphically normal and stenosed arteries before and after endolumen enlargement by angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 21: 308-316, 1993.
26. Ojha M, Cobbold SC, Johnston KW, Hummel RL. Pulsatile flow through constricted tubes: an experimental investigation using photochromic tracer methods. J Fluid Mech 203: 173-197, 1989.
27. Qiu Y, Tarbell JM. Computational simulation of flow in the end-to-end anastomosis of a rigid graft and a compliant artery. ASAIO J 42: M702- M709, 1996.
28. Qiu Y, Tarbell JM. Interaction between wall shear stress and circumferential strain affects endothelial cell biochemical production. J Vasc Res 37: 147-157, 2000.
29. Qiu Y, Tarbell JM. Numerical simulation of pulsatile flow in a compliant curved tube model of a coronary artery. J Biomech Eng 122: 77-85, 2000.
30. Santamarina A, Weydahl E, Siegel JM, Moore JE. Computational analysis of flow in a curved tube model of the coronary arteries: effects of time-varying curvature. Ann Biomed Eng 26: 944-954, 1998.
31. Schaar AJ, de Korte CL, Mastik F, van Damme LC, Krams R, Serruys PW, van der Steen AF. Three-dimensional palpography of human coronary arteries. Herz 30: 125-133, 2005.
32. Shimokawa H. Primary endothelial dysfunction: atherosclerosis. J Mol Cell Cardiol 31: 23-37, 1999.
33. Siebes M, Verhoeff B, Meuwissen M, de Winter R, Spaan J, Piek J. Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions. Circulation 109: 756-762, 2004.
34. Siouffi M, Deplano V, Pelissier R. Experimental analysis of unsteady flows through a stenosis. J Biomech 31: 11-19, 1998.
35. Slager CL, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen FJ, Thury A, Van der Wal AC, Schaar JA, Serruys PW. The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications. Nature Clinical Practice, Cardiovascular Medicine 2: 456-464, 2005.
36. Tada S, Donq C, Tarbell JM. Effect of the stress phase angle on the strain energy density of the endothelial plasma membrane. Biophys J 93: 3026-3033, 2007.
37. Tada S, Tarbell JM. A computational study of flow in a compliant carotid bifurcation-stress phase angle correlation with shear stress. Ann Biomed Eng 33: 1202-1212, 2005.
38. Thevenaz P. Interpolation revisited. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19: 739 -758, 2000.
39. Uchida S. The pulsating viscous flow superposed on the steady laminar motion incompressible fluid in a circular pipe. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Physik 7: 403-422, 1956.
40. Varghese A, Merrifield RD, Crowe LA, Collins SA, Keenan NG, Firmin DN, Yang GZ, Pennell DJ. Evaluation of carotid artery wall volume measurement using novel semiautomated analysis software. J Magn Reson Imaging 24: 1401-1408, 2006.
41. Westerhof N, Boer C, Lamberts RR, Sipkema P. Cross-talk between cardiac muscle and coronary vasculature. Physiol Rev 86: 1263-1308, 2006.
42. Womersley JR. Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. J Physiol 127: 553-563, 1955.
43. Zeng D, Ding Z, Friedman MH, Ethier CR. Effects of cardiac motion on right coronary artery hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 31: 420-429, 2003.