Synergistic moderator effects of situation and person factors of awareness and adjustment on the consistency of implicit and explicit attitudes

Journal of Individual Differences

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 47-56

  Gschwendner, Tobias ^a   Hofmann, Wilhelm ^a   Schmitt, Manfred ^a  

^a Rheinland Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

Implicit Association Test; Implicit explicit consistency; Implicit explicit moderation; Person situation interaction; Synergistic moderation

Indexed keywords

EID: 64049095645     PISSN: 16140001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001.27.1.47     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park. L.S. Aiken, S.G. West (Eds.).
2. Asendorpf J.B., Banse R., Mücke D. Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83:380-393.
3. Banse R., Gawronski B. Die Skala Motivation zu vorurteilsfreiem Verhalten: Skaleneigenschaften und Validierung [The scale motivation to act without prejudice. Psychometric properties and validities.]. Diagnostika 2003, 49:4-13.
4. Banse R., Seise J., Zerbes N. Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie 2001, 48:145-160.
5. Brown K.W., Ryan R.M. The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 84:822-848.
6. Busemeyer J.R., Jones L.E. Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin 1983, 93:549-562.
7. Chaplin W.F. The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. Journal of Personality 1991, 59:143-178.
8. Dovidio J.F., Kawakami K., Beach K.R. Implicit and explicit attitudes: Examination of the relationship between measures of in-group bias. Blackwell handbook of social psychology, Vol. 4: Intergroup processes 2001, 175-197. Blackwell, Oxford. R. Brown, S. Gaertner (Eds.).
9. Dunton B.C., Fazio R.H. An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1997, 23:316-326.
10. Fazio R.H. Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in experimental social psychology 1990, XXIII:75-109. Academic Press, New York. M.P. Zanna (Ed.).
11. Fazio R.H., Olson M.A. Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology 2003, 54:297-327.
12. Fenigstein A., Scheier M.F., Buss A.H. Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1975, 42:522-527.
13. Fragebogen zur Erfassung dispositionaler Selbstaufmerksamkeit (SAM) [Questionnaire for assessing dispositional self-consciousness] 1989, Hogrefe, Göttingen. S.-H. Filipp, E. Freudenberg (Eds.).
14. Gawronski B. What does the Implicit Association Test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice related IATs. Experimental Psychology 2002, 49:171-180.
15. Gawronski, B., Hofmann, W., & Wilbur, C.J., (in press). Are " implicit" attitudes unconscious?. Consciousness and Cognition.
16. Gibbons F.X. Self-attention and self-report: The " veridicality" hypothesis. Journal of Personality 1983, 51:517-542.
17. Greenwald A.G., Banaji M.R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 1995, 102:4-27.
18. Greenwald A.G., McGhee D.E., Schwartz J.L.K. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74:1464-1480.
19. Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test I: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 85:197-216.
20. Gschwendner T., Hofmann W., Schmitt M. Moderatoren der Konsistenz implizit und explizit erfasster Einstellungen und Persönlichkeitsmerkmale. [Moderators of the consistency of implicitly and explicitly assessed attitudes and personality traits]. Psychologische Rundschau 2006, 57:13-33.
21. Hixon J.G., Swann W.B. When does introspection bear fruit? Self-reflection, self-insight, and interpersonal choices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 64:35-43.
22. Hofmann W., Gawronski B., Gschwendner T., Le H., Schmitt M. A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31:1369-1385.
23. Hofmann W., Gschwendner T., Schmitt M. On implicit-explicit consistency: The moderating role of individual differences in awareness and adjustment. European Journal of Personality 2005, 9:25-49.
24. Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Nosek, B.A., & Schmitt, M., (in press). What moderates implicit-explicit consistency?. European Review of Social Psychology.
25. Kenrick D.T., Funder D.C. Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist 1988, 43:23-34.
26. Nosek B.A. Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:565-584.
27. Nosek, B.A., & Banaji, M.R., (2001). Privately expressed attitudes mediate the relationship between public and implicit attitudes. Paper presented at the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.
28. Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R. (At least) two factors moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes. Natura Automatyzmow [The nature of automaticity] 2002, 49-56. WIP PAN & SWPS, Warszawa. R.K. Ohme, M. Jarymowicz (Eds.).
29. Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R., Greenwald A.G. Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2002, 6:101-115.
30. Pettigrew T.F., Mertens R.W. Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology 1995, 25:57-75.
31. Plant E.A., Devine P.G. Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75:811-832.
32. Pryor J.B., Gibbons E.X., Wicklund R.A., Fazio R.B., Hood R. Self-focused attention and self-report validity. Journal of Personality 1977, 45:513-527.
33. Schmitt M., Eid M., Maes J. Synergistic person × situation interaction in distributive justice behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2003, 29:141-147.
34. Schmitt, M., & Maes, J., (2001). Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Gesamtes Erhebungsinstrumentarium [Justice issues in united Germany: Measurement instruments]. University of Trier, Germany.
35. Schmitt M., Sabbagh C. Synergistic person × situation interaction in distributive justice judgment and allocation behavior. Personality and Individual Differences 2004, 37:359-371.
36. Strack F., Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004, 8:220-247.