3D strain map of axially loaded mouse tibia: a numerical analysis validated by experimental measurements

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 95-100

  Stadelmann, Vincent A ^a   Hocké, Jean ^a   Verhelle, Jensen ^a   Forster, Vincent ^a   Merlini, Francesco ^a   Terrier, Alexandre ^a   Pioletti, Dominique P ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bone remodelling; Mechanical loading; Strain quantification; Tibia

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BONE REMODELING; C57BL MOUSE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; PHYSIOLOGY; SHEAR STRENGTH; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIBIA; VALIDATION STUDY; WEIGHT BEARING; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; BONE REMODELING; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIBIA; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 63849261039     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255840802178053     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Akhter MP, Cullen DM, Pedersen EA, Kimmel DB, Recker RR. 1998. Bone response to in vivo mechanical loading in two breeds of mice. Calcif Tissue Int. 63(5):442-449.
2. Carter DR. 1987. Mechanical loading history and skeletal biology. J Biomech. 20(11-12):1095-1109.
3. Chambers TJ, Evans M, Gardner TN, Turnersmith A, Chow JWM. 1993. Induction of bone-formation in rat tail vertebrae by mechanical loading. Bone Miner. 20(2): 167-178.
4. Chow JW, Jagger CJ, Chambers TJ. 1993. Characterization of osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation in cancellous bone of rat caudal vertebrae. Am J Physiol. 265(2 Pt 1): E340-E347.
5. De Souza RL, Matsuura M, Eckstein F, Rawlinson SC, Lanyon LE, Pitsillides AA. 2005. Non-invasive axial loading of mouse tibiae increases cortical bone formation and modifies trabecular organization: a new model to study cortical and cancellous compartments in a single loaded element. Bone. 37(6):810-818.
6. Fritton JC, Myers ER, Wright TM, van der Meulen MCH. 2005. Loading induces site-specific increases in mineral content assessed by microcomputed tomography of the mouse tibia. Bone. 36(6):1030-1038.
7. Gardner MJ, van der Meulen MC, Demetrakopoulos D, Wright TM, Myers ER, Bostrom MP. 2006. In vivo cyclic axial compression affects bone healing in the mouse tibia. J Orthop Res. 24(8):1679-1686.
8. Huiskes R, Ruimerman R, van Lenthe GH, Jannsen JD. 2000. Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature. 405(6787):704-706.
9. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, Dalstra M, Fudala B, Slooff TJ. 1987. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech. 20(11-12): 1135-1150.
10. Parfitt AM. 1996. Skeletal Heterogeneity and the purposes of Bone Remodeling. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey JL, editors. Osteoporosis. San Diego (CA): Academic Press. p. 315-329.
11. Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R. 1994. Mathematical modeling of mircodamage in bone remodeling and adaptation. Bone Structure and Remodeling, Amsterdam.
12. Rho JY, Hobatho MC, Ashman RB. 1995. Relations of mechanical-properties to density and Ct numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys. 17(5):347-355.
13. Rubin C, Gross T, Qin YX, Fritton S, Guilak F, McLeod K. 1996. Differentiation of the bone-tissue remodeling response to axial and torsional loading in the turkey ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 78(10):1523-1533.
14. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. 1984. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 66(3): 397-402.
15. Terrier A, Rakotomanana RL, Ramaniraka AN, Leyvraz PF. 1997. Adaptation models of anisotropic bone. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 1(1):47-59.
16. Turner CH, Pavalko FM. 1998. Mechanotransduction and functional response of the skeleton to physical stress: the mechanisms and mechanics of bone adaptation. J Orthop Sci. 3(6):346-355.