Intraluminal thrombus and risk of rupture in patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysm - FSI modelling

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 73-81

  Bluestein, Danny ^a   Dumont, Kris ^a   De Beule, Matthieu ^b   Ricotta, John ^c   Impellizzeri, Paul ^c   Verhegghe, Benedict ^b   Verdonck, Pascal ^b  

^a Stony Brook University   (United States)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; FSI modelling; Intraluminal thrombus; Risk of rupture

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA; ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; RUPTURE; SHEAR STRENGTH; THROMBOSIS; YOUNG MODULUS;

AORTA, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; RUPTURE, SPONTANEOUS; SHEAR STRENGTH; THROMBOSIS;

EID: 63849210317     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255840802176396     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abaqus, I. 2004. Online documentation: version 6.5-1., ABAQUS, Inc.
2. Bluestein D, Niu L, Schoephoerster RT, Dewanjee MK. 1996. Steady flow in an aneurysm model: correlation between fluid dynamics and blood platelet deposition. J Biomech Eng. 118(3):280-286.
3. DiMartino ES, Vorp DA. 2003. Effect of variation in intraluminal thrombus constitutive properties on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. Ann Biomed Eng. 31(7):804-809.
4. Fillinger M, Raghavan M, Marra S, Cronenwett J, Kennedy F. 2002. In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. J Vasc Surg. 36(3): 589-597.
5. Fillinger M, Raghavan M, Marra S, Kennedy F. 2003. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg. 37(4):724-732.
6. Kazi M, 2003. Influence of intraluminal thrombus on structural and cellular composition of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. J Vasc Surg. 38(6):1283-1292.
7. Leung JH, Wright AR, Cheshire N, Crane J, Thom SA, Hughes AD, Xu Y. 2006. Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models. Biomed Eng Online. 5:33.
8. Li Z, Kleinstreuer C. 2005a. A new wall stress equation for aneurysm-rupture prediction. Ann Biomed Eng. 33(2): 209-213.
9. Li Z, Kleinstreuer C. 2005b. Blood flow and structure interactions in a stented abdominal aortic aneurysm model. Med Eng Phys. 27(5):369-382.
10. Li Z, Kleinstreuer C. 2005c. Fluid-structure interaction effects on sac-blood pressure and wall stress in a stented aneurysm. J Biomech Eng. 127(4):662-671.
11. Mower WR, Quinones WJ, Gambhir SS. 1997. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. J Vasc Surg. 26(4):602-608.
12. Papaharilaou Y, Ekaterinaris JA, Manousaki E, Katsamouris AN. 2006. A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech. 40(2): 367-377.
13. Raghavan ML, Vorp DA. 2000. Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J Biomech. 33(4):475-482.
14. Schurink GWH, Van Baalen JM, Visser MJT, Van Bockel JH. 2000. Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure on the aneurysmal wall. J Vasc Surg. 31(3): 501-506.
15. Steinman DA, Milner JS, Norley CJ, Lownie SP, Holdsworth DW. 2003. Image-based computational simulation of flow dynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 24(4):559-566.
16. Thubrikar MJ, Robicsec F, Labrosse M, Chervenkoff V, Fowler BL. 2003. Effect of thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall dilation and stress. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 44(1): 67-77.
17. Vorp DA, Vande Geest JP. 2005. Biomechanical determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 25(8):1558-1566.
18. Vorp DA, Federspiel WJ, Webster MW. 1996a. Does laminated intraluminal thrombus within abdominal aortic aneurysm cause anoxia of the aortic wall? J Vasc Surg. 23(3): 540-541.
19. Vorp DA, Mandarino WA, Webster MW, Gorcsan J. 1996b. Potential influence of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm as assessed by a new non-invasive method. Cardiovasc Surg. 4(6):732-739.
20. Vorp DA, Wang DHJ, Webster MW, Federspiel WJ. 1998. Effect of intraluminal thrombus thickness and bulge diameter on the oxygen diffusion in abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech Eng. 120(5):579-583.
21. Vorp DA, Lee PC, Wang DHJ, Makaroun MS, Nemoto EM, Ogawa S, Webster MW. 2001. Association of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm with local hypoxia and wall weakening. J Vasc Surg. 34(2):291-299.
22. Wang DHJ, Makaroun MS, Webster MW, Vorp DA. 2002. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 36(3): 598-604.
23. Wolters B, Rutten M, Schurink G, Kose U, de Hart J, van de Vosse F. 2005. A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med Eng Phys. 27(10):871-883.