A new wall stress equation for aneurysm-rupture prediction

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 209-213

  Li, Z ^a   Kleinstreuer, C ^a  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

AAA rupture prediction; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Laplace structure equation; Semi empirical wall stress equation

Indexed keywords

AAA-RUPTURE PREDICTION; ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM; LAPLACE STRUCTURE EQUATION; SEMI-EMPIRICAL WALL STRESS EQUATION;

BLOOD VESSELS; CORRELATION METHODS; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; STRESSES; TISSUE; YIELD STRESS;

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ANIMAL; AORTA RUPTURE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; EVALUATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SHEAR STRENGTH;

ANIMALS; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 17044402937     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-005-8979-2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cappeller, W. A., H. Engelmann, S. Blechschmidt, M. Wild, and L. Lauterjung. Possible objectification of a critical maximum diameter for elective surgery in abdominal aortic aneurysms based on one- and three-dimensional ratios. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 38:623-628, 1997.
2. Di Martino, E. S., and D. A. Vorp. Effect of variation in intraluminal thrombus constitutive properties on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 31(7):804-809, 2003.
3. Di Martino, E. S., G. Guadagni, A. Fumero, and G. Ballerini. Fluid-structure interaction within realistic three-dimensional models of the aneurysmatic aorta as a guidance to assess the risk of rupture of the aneurysm. Med. Eng. Phys. 23:647-655, 2001.
4. Elger, D. F., D. M. Blackketter, R. S. Budwig, and K. H. Johansen. The influence of shape on the stresses in model abdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Biomech. Eng. (ASME) 118:326-332, 1996.
5. Fillinger, M. F., M. L. Raghavan, P. Marra, L. Cronenwett, and E. Kennedy. In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. J. Vasc. Surg. 36:589-596, 2002.
6. Fillinger, M. F., P. S. Marra, M. L. Raghavan, and E. F. Kennedy. Prediction of rupture in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: Wall stress versus diameter. J. Vasc. Surg. 37:724-732, 2003.
7. Hall, A. J., E. F. G. Busse, D. J. McCarville, and J. J. Burgess. Aortic wall tension as a predictive factor for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture: Improving the selection of patients for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 14:152-157, 2000.
8. Hatakeyama, T., H. Shigematsu, and T. Muto. Risk factors for rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm based on three dimensional study. J. Vasc. Surg. 33:453-461, 2001.
9. Holzapfel, G. A., T. C. Gasser, and R. W. Ogden. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J. Elasticity 61(1-3):1-48, 2000.
10. Li, Z., and C. Kleinstreuer. Computational analysis of fluid-structure interactions in a stented aneurysm model. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 8 (2005).
11. Limet, R., N. Sakalihassan, and A. Albert. Determination of the expansion rate and incidence of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 14:540-548, 1991.
12. Matsumoto, T., and M. Sato. Analysis of stress and strain distribution in the artery wall consisted of layers with different elastic modulus and opening angle. JSME Int. J. C-Mech. SY 45(4):906-912, 2002.
13. Ouriel, K., R. M. Green, C. Donayre, C. K. Shortell, J. Elliott, and J. A. Deweese. An evaluation of new methods of expressing aortic aneurysm size: Relationship to rupture. J. Vasc. Surg. 15:12-20, 1992.
14. Raghavan, M., D. Vorp, M. Federle, M. Makaroun, and M. Webster. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Vasc. Surg. 31:760-769, 2000.
15. Sonesson, B., T. Sandgren, and T. Lanne. Abdominal aortic aneurysm wall mechanics and their relation to risk of rupture. Eur. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 18:487-493, 1999.
16. Stenbaek, J., B. Kalin, and J. Swedenborg. Growth rate of thrombus may be a better predictor of rupture than diameter in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 20:466-469, 2000.
17. Thurbrikar, M., J. Al-Soudi, and F. Robicsek. Wall stress studies of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a clinical model. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 3:355-366, 2000.
18. Uflacker, R., and J. Robison. Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A review. Eur. Radiol. 11:739-753, 2001.
19. Vardulaki, K. A., T. C. Prevost, N. M. Walker, N. E. Day, A. B. M. Wilmink, C. R. G. Quick, H. A. Ashton, and A. P. Scott. Growth rates and risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br. J. Surg. 85:1674-1680, 1998.
20. Vorp, D. A., M. L. Raghavan, and M. W. Webster. Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: Influence of diameter and asymmetry. J. Vasc. Surg. 27:632-639, 1998.
21. Wang, D., M. Makaroun, M. Webster, and D. A. Vorp. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient specific model of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Vasc. Surg. 3:598-604, 2002.
22. Wilson, K. A., A. J. Lee, P. R. Hoskins, F. G. Fowkers, C. V. Ruckley, and A. W. Bradbury. The relationship between aortic wall distensibility and rupture of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. J. Vasc. Surg. 37:112-117, 2003.
23. Zhao, S. Z., X. Y. Xu, and M. W. Collins. The numerical analysis of fluid-solid interactions for blood flow in arterial structures. Part 2. Development of coupled fluid-solid algorithms. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H, J. Eng. Med. 212:241-252, 1998.