The new teacher education in the United States: Directions forward

Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 271-282

  Cochran Smith, Marilyn ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Teacher education; Teacher education policy; Teacher quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 63849095653     PISSN: 13540602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13540600802037678     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alien, M. (2003), Eight questions on teacher preparation: What does the research say? Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States
2. Berliner, D., Biddle, B., & Bell, J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America's public schools. New York: Perseus
3. Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2005). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. New York: City University of New York
4. Bracey, G. (2003). April foolishness: The 20th anniversay of a nation at risk. Retrieved February 22, 2004, from http://www.peklntl.Org/Kappan/K0304bra. htm
5. Bracey, G. (2004). Setting the record straight: Responses to misconceptions about public education in the US. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
6. Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). The new teacher education: For better or for worse? Educational Researcher, 34(6), 181-206
7. Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Policy, practice and politics in teacher education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
8. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2001). Sticks, stones, and ideology: The discourse of reform in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 3-15
9. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2005). Paradigms and politics: Researching teacher education in changing times. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 69-110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
10. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytic, S. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development in practice (pp. 45-60). New York: Teachers College Press
11. Cuban, L. (1992). Managing dilemmas while building professional communities. Educational Researcher, 21(1), 4-12
12. Decker, P., Mayer, D., & Glazerman, S. (2004). The effects of teach for American on students: Findings from a national evaluation (No. MPR reference NO: m 8792-750). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc
13. Earley, P. (2004). Title ii reauthorization, challenges and opportunities: White paper for the American association of colleges for teacher education. Unpublished manuscript, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
14. Elmore, R. (2002). The testing trap. Harvard Magazine, 105(1), 35
15. Erickson, F. (2005). Arts, humanities and sciences in educational research and social engineering in federal education policy. Teachers College Record, 107( 1), 4-9
16. Grubb, W. N., & Lazerson, M. (2004). The education gospel: The economic power of schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
17. Gutman, A. (1999). Democratic education (with a new preface and epilogue). Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press
18. Hanushek, E. (2002). Teacher quality. In L. Izumi & W. Evers (Eds.), Teacher quality (pp. 1-12). Palo Alto, CA: Hoover Institution
19. Hess, F. (2001). Tear down this wall: The case for a radical overhaul of teacher certification. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy institute
20. Lasley, T., Seidentop, D., & Yinger, R. (2006). A systematic approach to enhancing teacher quality: The Ohio model. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 13-21
21. Lather, P. (2004). This is your father's paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 15-34
22. Louisiana Board of Regents. (2004). New teacher preparation effectiveness assessment model detailed for regents. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Board of Regents
23. Michelli, N., & Keiser, D. (Eds.). (2004). Teacher education for diversity and social justice. New York: Routledge
24. National Center on Education and the Economy. (2006). Tough choices, tough times: The report of the new commission on the skills of the American workforce. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy
25. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office
26. Oaks, J., Lipton, M., Rogers, J., & Renee, M. (2006). Research as a tool for democratizing education policymaking. Paper presented at International Symposium on figuring and re-configuring research, policy and practice for the Knowledge Society, Dublin, Ireland
27. Schalock, D., Schalock, M, & Myton, D. (1998). Effectiveness - along with quality - should be the focus. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(6), 468-470
28. Stone, D. (1997). The policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: W.W. Norton
29. Teaching Commission. (2004). Teaching at risk: A call to action. New York: Teaching Commission
30. Trinder, L. (2000). A critical appraisal of evidence-based practice. In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidence-based practice, a critical appraisal (pp. 212-241). London: Blackwell Science
31. US Department of Education. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The secretary's annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: US Department of Education
32. US Department of Education. (2003). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The secretary 's second annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: US Department of Education
33. US Department of Education. (2004). The secretary's third annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: US Department of Education
34. Whitehurst, G. (2001). Evidence-based education (EBE). Retrieved September 12, 2003, from http:// www.ed.gov
35. Williams, B., Mitchell, A., & Leibbrand, J. (2003). Navigating change: Preparing for a performance-based accreditation review. Washington, DC: National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education