Research progress on ecological risk assessment

Chinese Journal of Ecology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 335-341

  Sun, Hong Bo ^a,b   Yang, Gui Shan ^a   Su, Wei Zhong ^a   Wan, Rong Rong ^a  

^a NANJING INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND LIMNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Assessment; Ecological risk; Framework; Model

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 63649111252     PISSN: 10004890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Chinese source.
2. Chinese source.
3. Chinese source.
4. Chinese source.
5. Chinese source.
6. Chinese source.
7. Chinese source.
8. Chinese source.
9. Chinese source.
10. Chinese source.
11. Chinese source.
12. Chinese source.
13. Chinese source.
14. Chinese source.
15. Chinese source.
16. Chinese source.
17. Chinese source.
18. AG (Australian Government). 1999. Assessment of Site Contamination NEPM 1999: Schedules B (5). Adelaide, Australia: National Environmental Protection Council.
19. Barnthouse LW, Suter GW, Rosen AE, et al. 1987. Estimating responses of fish populations to toxic contaminants. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 6: 811-824.
20. Bascietto J, Hinckley D, Plafkin J, et al. 1990. Ecotoxicology and ecological risk assessment. Environental Science and Technology, 24: 137-145.
21. Cairns JJ, Dickson KL, Maki AW. 1978. Estimating the hazard of chemical substances to aquatic life. STP 657. Philadelphia, PA, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
22. Claassen M, Strydom WF, Murray K, et al. 2001. Ecological risk assessment guidelines. TT 151/01. Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.
23. Clarkson J, Glaser S, Kierski M, et al. 2001. Application of risk assessment in different countries// Linkov I, Palma-Oliveira J, eds. Assessment and Management of Environmental Risks: Cost-Efficient Methods arld Applications. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Publishers: 17-27.
24. Dickson JK, Maki AW, Cairns JJ. 1979. Analyzing the Hazard Evaluation Process. Washington, DC, USA: American Fisheries Society.
25. Domene X, Ramirez W, Mattana S, et al. 2008. Ecological risk assessment of organic waste amendments using the species sensitivity distribution from a soil organisms test battery. Environmental Pollution, 155: 227-236.
26. Hickey GL, Craig PS, Hart A. 2008. On the application of loss functions in determining assessment factors for ecological risk. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. [2008-09-29]. http: //www.nebi.nIm.nih.gov/ pubmed/18691758.
27. Hanson ML, Solomon KR. 2004. Haloacetic acids in the aquatic environment. Part II : Ecological risk assessment. Environmental Pollution, 130: 385-401.
28. Hayes EH, Landis WG. 2004. Regional risk assessment of a near shore marine environment: Cherry Point, WA. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 10: 299-325.
29. Hope BK. 2006. An examination of ecological risk assessment and management. Environment International, 32: 983-995.
30. Landis WG. 2003. The frontier in ecological risk assessment at expanding spatial and temporal scales. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 9: 1415-1424.
31. Louda SM, Tatyana AR, Leland RF, et al. 2005. Assessment of ecological risks in weed biocontrol: Input from retrospective ecological analyses. Biological Control, 35: 253-264.
32. Maltby L. 2006. Environmental risk assessment// Hester RE, Harrison RM, eds. Chemicals in the Environment: Assessing and Managing Risk. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry Publishing: 84-101.
33. Moraes R, Landis WG, Molander S, 2002. Regional risk assessment of a Brazilian Rain Forest. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 8: 1779-1803.
34. Moraes R, Molander S, 2004, A procedure for ecological tiered assessment of risks (PETAR). Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 10: 349-371.
35. Neff JM, Johnsen S, Frost TK, et al. 2006. Oil well produced water discharges to The North Sea. Part II: Comparison of deployed mussels ( Mytilus edulis) and the DREAM model to predict ecological risk. Marine Environmental Research, 62: 224-246.
36. Norton SB, Rodier DJ, Gentile JH, et al. 1992. A framework for ecological risk assessment at the EPA. Environtal Toxicology and Chemistry, 11: 1663-1667.
37. Obery AM, Landis WG. 2002. A regional multiple stressor risk assessment of the Codorus Creek watershed applying the Relative Risk Model, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 8: 405-428.
38. O'Neill PV, Gardner RH, Barnthouse LW, et al. 1982. Ecosystem risk analysis: A new methodology. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1: 67-77.
39. Purucker ST, Welsh CJE, Stewart RN, et al. 2007. Use of habitat-contamination spatial correlation to determine when to perform a spatially explicit ecological risk assessment. Ecological Modelling, 204: 180-192.
40. Semenzin E, Critto A, Carlon C, et al. 2007. Development of a site-specific ecological risk assessment for contaminated sites: Part I. A multi-criteria based system for the selection of ecotoxicological tests and ecological observations. Science of the Total Environment, 379: 16-33.
41. Suter GWI, Vaughan DS, Gardner RH. 1983. Risk assessment by analysis of extrapolation error, a demonstration for effects of pollutants on fish. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2: 69-78.
42. Taylor KW, Chenier R. 2003. Introduction to ecological risk assessments of priority substances under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 9: 447-461.
43. USEPA. 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment [2008-09-291]. http: //cfpub.epa.gov/neea/raf/recordisplay.cfm? deid = 12460.
44. USEPA. 2002. Ecological Risk Assessment for the Middle Snake River, Idaho [2008-09-29] http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm? deid = 29097.
45. Victor B. 2002. Applying ecological risk principles to watershed assessment and management. Environmental Management, 29: 145-154.
46. Zhou SJ, Griffiths SP. 2008. Sustainability assessment for fishing effects (SAFE): A new quantitative ecological risk assessment method and its application to elasmobranch bycatch in an Australian trawl fishery. Fisheries Research, 91: 56-68.