Isakos scientific committee report knee rating scales

Arthroscopy

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 1103-1108

  Marx, Robert G ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63549087834     PISSN: 07498063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.I016/j.anhro.2003.10.029     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Marx RG. Knee rating scales for clinical outcome. In: Callaghan JJ, Rubash HE, Simonian PT, Wickiewicz TL, Rosenberg AG, eds. The adult knee. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002:367-378,
2. Streiner DL, Norman OR, Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 1989.
3. Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX. Measuring diseasespecific quality of life in clinical trials. Can Med Assoc J 1986; 134:889-995.
4. Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep 1966;19:3-11.
5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
6. Bland JM, Altrnan DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Coinput Biol Med 1990;20:337340.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: Why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995;346:1085-1087.
8. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 1991;12:142S-158S (suppl).
9. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biastatixtics. Toronto: Duxbury Press, 1995.
10. Wright JG, Feinstein AR. A comparative contrast of clinimetric and psychometric methods for constructing indexes and rating scales. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:1201-1218.
11. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Pxvchometric theory. Ed 3. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
12. Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Wainner RS, Fu FH, Harner CD. Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:1132-1145.
13. Marx RG, Bombardier C, Hogg-Johnson S, Wright JG. Clinimetric and psychometric strategies for development of a health measurement scale. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:105-111.
14. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993;! 18:622-629.
15. Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:79-93.
16. Wright JG, Young NL. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:239-246.
17. Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, Ng L. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med 1998;26:764772.
18. L'lnsalata JC, Warren RF, Cohen SB, Altchek DW, Peterson MO. A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder [see commentsJ. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:738-748.
19. Martin DP, Engelberg R, Agel J, Swiontkowski MF. Comparison of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire with the Short Form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Sickness Impact Profile health-status measures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1323-1335.
20. Liang MH, Fossel AH. Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990;28:632-642.
21. Weitzel PP, Richmond JC. Critical evaluation of different scoring systems of the knee. Sports Med Arthrose Rev 2002; 10:183-190.
22. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 1985:43-49.
23. Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 1982;10:150-154.
24. Gauffin H, Pettersson G, Tegner Y, Tropp H. Function testing in patients with old rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Int J Sports Med 1990;! 1:73-77.
25. Odensten M, Hamberg P, Nordin M, Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Surgical or conservative treatment of the acutely torn anterior cruciate ligament. A randomized study with short-term follow-up observations. Clin Orthop 1985:87-93.
26. Roberts TS, Drez D, Jr., McCarthy W, Paine R. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using freeze-dried, ethylene oxide-sterilized, bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. Two year results in thirty-six patients [published erratum appears in Am J Sports Med 1991;19:272J.
27. Am J Sports Med 1991;19: 35-41.
28. Shapiro ET, Richmond JC. Rockett SE, McGrath MM, Donaldson WR. The use of a generic, patient-based health assessment (SF-36) for evaluation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 1996;24:196-200.
29. Marx RG, Jones EC, Alien AA, et al. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001 ;83:1459-1469.
30. Noyes FR, Mooar PA, Matthews DS, Butler DL. The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part I: The long-term functional disability in athletically active individuals. / Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:154-162.
31. Noyes FR, Matthews DS, Mooar PA, Grood ES. The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part II: The results of rehabilitation, activity modification, and counseling on functional disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:163-174.
32. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW. Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:402-416.
33. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Scoring algorithms for the lower limb: Outcomes data collection instrument. Version 2.0. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1998.
34. Williams GN, Taylor DC, Gangel TJ, Uhorchak JM, Arciero RA. Comparison of the single assessment numeric evaluation method and the Lysholm score. Clin Orthop 2000:184-192.
35. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-Development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Spurts Phyx Ther 1998;28:88-96.
36. Mohtadi N. Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med 1998;26:350-359.
37. Hefti F, Muller W. Heutiger Stand der Evaluation von Kniebandlasionen; Das neue IKDC-Knie-Evaluationsblatt. Orthopäde 1993;22:351-362.
38. Irrgang J. ACL outcomes. Montreaux, Switzerland: International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, 2001.
39. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J. Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheurnatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rhewnatol 1988; 15:1833-1840.
40. Bellamy N, Sothern RB, Campbell J. Rhythmic variations in pain perception in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol 1990;17:364-372.
41. Bellamy N. Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol Suppl 1995;43:49-51.
42. Bombardier C, Melfi CA, Paul J, et al. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Mecl Cure 1995;33: AS131-144.
43. Kirkley A, Webster-Bogaert S, Litchfield R, et al. The effect of bracing on varus gonarthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81 : 539-548.
44. Theiler R, Sangha O, Schaeren S, et al. Superior responsiveness of the pain and function sections of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) as compared to the Lequesne-Algofunctional Index in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999;7:515-519.
45. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O. Ryd L, Lidgren L. Translation and validation of the Oxford-12 item knee score for use in Sweden. Ada Ortliop Scant! 2000;71:268-274.
46. Wigler I, Neumann L, Yaron M. Validation study of a Hebrew version of WOMAC in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Rheumatol 1999; 18:402-405.
47. Lequesne MG, Mery C, Samson M, Gerard P. Indexes of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: Validation-value in comparison with other assessment tests. Scant! J Rheumatol 1987;65:85-89 (suppl).
48. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:63-69.
49. Barber SD, Noyes FR, Mangine RE, McCloskey JW, Hartman W. Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Clin Orthop 1990;255:204-214.
50. Armitage P, Berry O. Statistical methods in medical research. Ed 3. London: Blackwell, 1994.
51. Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Mecl 2001;29:213-218.
52. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE, Fithian DC, Rossman DJ, Kaufman KR. Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study [see commentsJ. Am J Sports Med 1994;22: 632-644.
53. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mooar LA. A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders. Clin Orthop 1989:238-249.
54. Seto JL, Orofino AS, Morrissey MC, Medeiros JM, Mason WJ. Assessment of quadriceps/hamstring strength, knee ligament stability, functional and sports activity levels five years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1988;16:170-180.
55. Sträub T, Hunter RE. Acute anterior cruciate ligament repair. Clin Orthop 1988;227:238-250.