Investigating automatic dominance estimation in groups from visual attention and speaking activity

ICMI'08: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 233-236

  Hung, Hayley ^a   Jayagopi, Dinesh Babu ^a,b   Ba, Sileye ^a   Odobez, Jean Marc ^a,b   Gatica Perez, Daniel ^a,b  

^a IDIAP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Audio visual feature extraction; Dominance modeling; Meetings; Visual focus of attention estimation

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; RECORDING INSTRUMENTS; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

AUDIO-VISUAL FEATURE EXTRACTION; DOMINANCE MODELING; ESTIMATION PERFORMANCE; GROUP DISCUSSIONS; MEETINGS; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGIES; VISUAL ATTENTIONS; VISUAL FOCUS OF ATTENTION ESTIMATION; VISUAL TARGETS;

FEATURE EXTRACTION;

EID: 63449125965     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1452392.1452441     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. S. O. Ba and J.-M. Odobez. A Rao-Blackwellized mixed state particle filter for head pose tracking. In Proc. ACM-ICMI-MMMP, pages 9-16, 2005.
2. S. O. Ba and J.-M. Odobez. Multi-party focus of attention recognition in meetings from head pose and multimodal contextual cues. In Proc. ICASSP, 2008.
3. S. O. Ba and J.-M. Odobez. Multi-Person Visual Focus of Attention from Head Pose and Meeting Contextual Cues Idiap Research Repor IDIAP-RR-08-47
4. J. Carletta et al. The AMI meeting corpus: A pre-announcement. In Proc.MLMI, 2005.
5. J. F. Dovidio and S. L. Ellyson. Decoding visual dominance: Attributions of power based on relative percentages of looking while speaking and looking while listening. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(2):106-113, June 1982.
6. N. E. Dunbar and J. K. Burgoon. Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(2):207-233, 2005.
7. H. Hung et al. Using audio and video features to classify the most dominant person in a group meeting. In Proc. ACM Multimedia, 2007.
8. D. Jayagopi et al. Modeling dominance in group conversations using nonverbal activity cues. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, accepted for publication.
9. N. Jovanovic. To Whom It May Concern - Addressee Identification in Face-to-Face Meetings, PhD thesis, University of Twente, 2007.
10. S. R. Langton, et al. Do the eyes have it? cues to the direction of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(2):50-59, February 2000.
11. J.-M. Odobez and S. Ba. A cognitive and unsupervised MAP adaptation approach to the recognition of focus of attention from head pose. In Proc. ICME, 2007.
12. K. Otsuka, et al. Quantifying interpersonal influence in face-to-face conversations based on visual attention patterns. In Proc. ACM CHI Extended Abstracts, 2006.
13. J. Sturm et al. Influencing social dynamics in meetings through a peripheral display. In Proc. ICMI, 2007.
14. R. Vertegaal and Y. Ding. Explaining effects of eye gaze on mediated group conversations: amount or synchronization? In Proc. ACM CSCW, 2002.