Explaining effects of eye gaze on mediated group conversations: Amount or synchronization?

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 41-48

  Vertegaal, Roel ^a   Ding, Yaping ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agents; Attentive Interfaces; Avatars; Eye Tracking; Gaze; Multiparty Mediated Communication

Indexed keywords

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; TELECONFERENCING; USER INTERFACES; VIRTUAL REALITY;

AVATARS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 0037661117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Argyle, M. and Cook, M. Gaze and Mutual Gaze. London: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
2. Argyle, M. and Dean, J. Eye-contact, Distance and Affiliation. Sociometry 28(3), 1965, pp. 289-304.
3. Argyle, M. and Ingham, R. Gaze, Mutual Gaze and Proximity. Semiotica 6(1), 1972, pp. 32-49.
4. Bennet, G.K., Seashore, H.G., and Wesman, A.G. Manual for the Differential Aptitude Tests. New York: The Psych. Corporation, 1959.
5. Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., et al. Embodiment in Conversational Interfaces: Rea. In Proceedings of CHI'99. Pittsburgh, PA: ACM, 1999, pp. 520-527.
6. Colburn, A., Cohen, M.F., and Drucker, S.M. The Role of Eye Gaze in Avatar Mediated Conversational Interfaces. Report MSR-TR-2000-81. Microsoft Research, 2000.
7. Enheduanna. Nin-me-sár-ra. Sumerian cuneiform tablets, Mesopotamia: ± 2500 B.C. Republished in Hallo, W.W. and van Dijk, J.J.A. (Ed.), The Exaltation of Inanna. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968, pp. 101.
8. Exline, R.V. Explorations in the Process of Person Perception: Visual Interaction in Relation to Competition, Sex and Need for Affiliation. Journal of Personality 31(1), 1963, pp. 1-20.
9. Garau, M., Slater, M., Bee, S., and Sasse, M.A. The Impact of Eye Gaze on Communication using Humanoid Avatars. In Proceedings of CHI'01. Seattle, WA: ACM, 2001, pp. 309-316.
10. Kalma, A. Gazing in Triads: A Powerful Signal in Floor Apportionment. British Journal of Social Psychology 31(1), 1992, pp. 21-39.
11. Kendon, A. Some Functions of Gaze-Direction in Social Interaction. Acta Psychologica 26(1), 1967, pp. 22-63.
12. Nielsen, G. Studies in Self Confrontation. Copenhagen: Monksgaard, 1962.
13. Rutter, D.R., Morley, I.E., and Graham, J.C. Visual Interaction in a Group of Introverts and Extraverts. European Journal on Social Psychology 2(4), 1972, pp. 371-184.
14. Vertegaal, R. The GAZE Groupware System: Mediating Joint Attention in Multiparty Communication and Collaboration. In Proceedings of CHI'99. Pittsburg, PA: ACM, 1999, pp. 294-301.
15. Vertegaal, R., Slagter, R., Van der Veer, G.C., and Nijholt, A. Why Conversational Agents Should Catch the Eye. In Extended Abstracts of CHI'00. The Hague, Netherlands: ACM, 2000, pp. 257-258.
16. Vertegaal, R., Slagter, R., Van der Veer, G.C., and Nijholt, A. Eye Gaze Patterns in Conversations: There is More to Conversational Agents Than Meets the Eyes. In Proceedings of CHI'01. Seattle, WA: ACM, 2001, pp. 301-308.
17. Vertegaal, R., Van der Veer, G.C., and Vons, H. Effects of Gaze on Multiparty Mediated Communication. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000. Montreal, Canada: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2000, pp. 95-102.