The organization of end user development in an accounting company

End User Computing Challenges and Technologies: Emerging Tools and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 102-123

  Mørch, Anders I ^a   Åsand, Hege René Hansen ^a,b   Ludvigsen, Sten R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b STATOIL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63449092397     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-295-4.ch007     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Ackerman, M.S., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (2003). Sharing expertise: Beyond knowledge management. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2. Åsand, H.-R.H., Mørch, A., & Ludvigsen, S. (2004). Super users: A strategy for ICT-introduction. In A.M. Kanstrup, A.M. Roskilde, & D.K. Universitesforlag (Eds.), E-learning at work (pp. 131-147, in Danish).
3. Bansler, J.P., & Havn, E. (1994). Information systems development with generic systems. In W.R.J. Baets (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Information Systems, Nijenrode University (pp. 30-31). Breukelen: Nijenrode University Press.
4. Carroll, J.M., Kellogg, W.A., & Rosson, M.B. (1992). The task-artifact cycle. In J.M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (Cambridge Series on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 74-102). Cambridge University Press.
5. Christiansen, E. (1997). Gardening: A metaphor for sustainability in information technologytechnical support. In J. Berleur & D. Whitehouse (Eds.), An ethical global information society: Culture and democracy revisited. London: Chapman & Hall.
6. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Costabile, M.F., Foglia, D., Fresta, G., Mussio, P., & Piccinno, A. (2004). Software environments for end-user development and tailoring. PsychNology Journal, 2(1), 99-122.
8. Edwards, R. (1997). Changing places: Flexibility, lifelong learning, and a learning society. London: Routledge.
9. Eisenberg, M. (1995). Programmable applications: Interpreter meets interface. SIGCHI Bulletin, 27(2), 68-83.
10. Ellström, P.E., Gustavsson, B., & Larsson, S. (1996). Livslångt lärande [Lifelong learning]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
11. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
12. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133-156.
13. Fischer, G., & Girgensohn, A. (1990). End-user modifiability in design environments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'90) (pp. 183-192). New York: ACM Press.
14. Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Ye, Y., Sutcliffe, A.G., & Mehandjiev, N. (2004). Meta-design: A manifesto for end-user development. Communications of the ACM, 47(9), 33-37.
15. Fischer, G., & Lemke, A.C. (1988). Constrained design processes: Steps toward convivial computing. In R. Guindon (Ed.), Cognitive science and its application for human-computer interaction (pp. 1-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Gantt, M., & Nardi, B. (1992). Gardeners and gurus: Patterns of cooperation among CAD users. In Proceedings of the Conference on ComputerHuman Interaction (CHI '92) (pp. 107-117). New York: ACM Press.
17. Grudin, J. (1991). Interactive systems: Bridging the gaps between developers and users. IEEE Computer, 24(4), 59-69.
18. Guribye, F. (2005). Infrastructures for learning: Ethnographic inquiries into the social and technical conditions for education and training. Doctoral thesis, University of Bergen, Norway, Department of Information Science and Media Studies.
19. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 174-196.
20. Kaasbøll, J., & Øgrim, L. (1994). Super-users: Hackers, management hostages or working class heroes? A study of user influence on redesign in distributed organizations. In Proceedings of the 17th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS-17) (pp. 784-798). Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu, Finland.
21. Kanstrup, A-M. (2004). E-learning behind the facade: The value of local gardeners. In A.M. Kanstrup, A.M. Roskilde, & D.K. Universitesforlag (Eds.), E-learning at work (pp. 149-166, in Danish).
22. Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Activity theory: Implications for human-computer interaction. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 103-116). Cambridge: MIT Press.
23. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge: MIT Press.
24. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University Press.
25. Lieberman, H., Paterno, F., & Wulf, V. (Eds.). (2006). End-user development. Berlin: SpringerVerlag.
26. Mackay, W.E. (1990). Patterns of sharing customizable software. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'90) (pp. 209-221). New York: ACM Press.
27. MacLean, A., Carter, K., Lövstrand, L., & Moran, T. (1990). User-tailorable systems: Pressing the issue with buttons. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'90) (pp. 175-182). New York: ACM Press.
28. Mehandjiev, N., & Bottaci, L. (Eds.). (1998). Enduser development [Special issue]. Journal of End User Computing, 10(2).
29. Mørch, A. (1996). Evolving a generic application into a domain-oriented design environment. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 8(2), 63-90.
30. Mørch, A.I. (2003). Aspect-oriented software components. In N. Patel (Ed.), Adaptive evolutionary information systems (pp. 105-123). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
31. Mørch, A.I., Engen, B.K., & Åsand, H.-R.H. (2004a). The workplace as a learning laboratory: The winding road to e-learning in a Norwegian service company. In Proceedings of PDC 2004 (pp. 142-151).
32. Mørch, A.I., Stevens, G., Won, M., Klann, M., Dittrich, Y., & Wulf, V. (2004b). Componentbased technologies for end-user development. Communications of the ACM, 47(9), 59-62.
33. Nardi, B. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and humancomputer interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Netteland, G., Wasson, B., & Mørch, A.I. (2007). E-learning in a large organization: A study of the critical role of information sharing [Special issue]. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(6), 392-411.
35. Nygaard, K. (1984). User-oriented languages. In Proceedings of Medical Informatics Europe 84 (pp. 38-44). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
36. Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Star, S.L., & Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907- 39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.
38. Stevens, G., & Wulf, V. (2002). A new dimension in access control: Studying maintenance engineering across organizational boundaries. In Proceedings of CSCW'92 (pp. 196-205). New York: ACM Press.
39. Trigg, R.H., Moran, T.P., & Halasz, F.G. (1987). Adaptability and tailorability in NoteCards. In H.-J. Bullinger & B. Shackel (Eds.), Proceedings of lNTERACT'87 (pp. 723-728). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
40. Volkoff, O., Strong, D.M., & Elmes, M.B. (2002, August 9-11). Between a rock and a hard place: Boundary spanners in an ERP implementation. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, Texas (pp. 958-962).
41. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Won, M., Stiemerling, O., & Wulf, V. (2006). Component-based approaches to tailorable systems. In H. Lieberman, F. Paterno, & V. Wulf (Eds.), End-user development. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.