Support and nonsupport for nationalist rebellion: A prospect theory approach

Political Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 703-726

  Masters, Daniel ^a  

^a MARSHALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collective action; Ethnonational rebellion; Prospect theory; Territoriality

Indexed keywords

EID: 6344286137     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00394.x     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (1994). Reference points and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 457-498.
2. Berejikian, J. (1992). Revolutionary collective action and the agent-structure problem. American Political Science Review, 86, 647-657.
3. Berejikian, J. (2002). Model building with prospect theory: A cognitive approach to international relations. Political Psychology, 23, 759-786.
4. Gurr, T. R. (1988). Empirical research on political terrorism: The state of the art and how it might be improved. In R. O. Slater & M. Stohl (Eds.), Current perspectives on international terrorism (pp. 115-154). London: Macmillan.
5. Gurr, T. R. (1996). Minorities, nationalities, and ethnopolitical conflict. In C. A. Crocker, F. O. Hampson, & P. Aall (Eds.), Managing global chaos: Sources of and responses to international conflict (pp. 53-77). Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
6. Hall, J. (1993). Ideas and the social sciences. In J. Goldstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change (pp. 31-54). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7. Herb, G. H. (1999). National identity and territory. In G. H. Herb & D. H. Kaplan (Eds.), Nested identities: Nationalism, territory, and scale (pp. 9-30). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
9. Kameda, T., & Davis, J. H. (1990). The function of the reference point in individual and group risk decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 55-76.
10. Knight, D. B. (1988). Self-determination for indigenous peoples: The context for change. In R. J. Johnston, D. B. Knight, & E. Kofman (Eds.), Nationalism, self-determination, and political geography (pp. 117-134). New York: Croom Helm.
11. Levi, A. S., & Whyte, G. (1997). A cross cultural exploration of the reference dependence of crucial group decisions under risk: Japan's 1941 decision for war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 792-813.
12. Levy, J. S. (1997). Prospect theory, rational choice and international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 41, 87-112.
13. Levy, J. S. (2000). Loss aversion, framing effects, and international conflict. In M. I. Midlarsky (Ed.), Handbook of war studies II (pp. 193-221). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
14. Lichbach, M. I. (1995). The rebel's dilemma. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
15. Maoz, Z. (1990). Framing the national interest. World Politics, 43, 77-110.
16. McDermott, R. (1998). Risk-taking in international politics: Prospect theory in American foreign policy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
17. McGuire, T. W., Kiesler, S., & Siegel, J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 917-930.
18. Olson, M., Jr. (1990). The logic of collective action in Soviet-type societies. Journal of Soviet Nationalities, 1 (Summer), 8-27.
19. Paese, P. W., Bieser, M., & Tubbs, M. E. (1993). Framing effects and shifts in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 149-165.
20. Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1995). Outcome knowledge, regret, and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 119-127.
21. Schweitzer, M. (1994). Disentangling status quo and omission effects: An experimental analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 457-476.
22. Seibert, S. E., & Goltz, S. M. (2001). Comparison of allocations by individuals and interacting groups in an escalation of commitment situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 134-156.
23. Smith, C. D. (1992). Palestine and the Arab-Israeli conflict. New York: St. Martin's.
24. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133-155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Jr., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment process, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464-481.
26. Tilly, C. A. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27. Toft, M. D. (2001, April). A theory of territory, indivisibility, and ethnic violence. Paper presented at the Post-Communist Politics and Economics Workshop, Harvard University.
28. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
29. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59, S251-S278.
30. Tversky, A., Slovic, P., & Kahneman, D. (1990). The causes of preference reversal. American Economic Review, 80, 204-217.
31. Whyte, G. (1993). Escalating commitment in individual and group decision-making: A prospect theory approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 430-455.