Evaluating shared workspace performance using human information processing models

Information Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Ferreira, Antonio ^a   Antunes, Pedro ^a   Pino, José A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63349104762     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Antunes, P., Ramires, J. & Respicio, A. (2006). Addressing the conflicting dimension of groupware: a case study in software requirements validation. Computing and Informatics, 25(6), 1001-1024.
2. Baker, K., Greenberg, S. & Gutwin, C. (2002). Empirical development of a heuristic evaluation methodology for shared workspace groupware. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, (pp. 96-105). New York, NY: ACM Press.
3. Baeza-Yates, R. & Pino, J.A. (2006). Towards formal evaluation of collaborative work and its application to information retrieval. Information Research, 11(4), paper 271. Retrieved 4 August, 2008 from http://informationr.net/ir/11-4/paper271.html. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5dJeeBOhk)
4. Beyer, H. & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
5. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P. & Newell, A. (1980). The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems. Communications of the ACM, 23(7), 396-410.
6. Card, S.K., Newell, A. & Moran, T.P. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Cosquer, F.J.N., Antunes, P. & Verissimo, P. (1996). Enhancing dependability of cooperative applications in partitionable environments. In A. Hlawiczka, J. Silva & L. Simoncini (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd European Dependable Computing Conference, Taorima, Italy. (pp. 335-352). Berlin: Springer Verlag. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1150). Retrieved 24 December, 2008 from http://www.di.fc.ul.pt/~paa/papers/edcc-96.pdf. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5dJerTJqR)
8. Dewan, P. & Choudhary, R. (1995). Coupling the user interfaces of a multiuser program. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2(1), 1-39.
9. Douglas, S.A. & Kirkpatrick, A.E. (1999). Model and representation: the effect of visual feedback on human performance in a color picker interface. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 18(2), 96-127.
10. Fjermestad, J. & Hiltz, S. (1999). An assessment of group support systems experimental research: methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(3), 7-149.
11. Grudin, J. (1994). Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 92-105.
12. Gutwin, C., Benford, S., Dyck, J., Fraser, M., Vaghi, I. & Greenhalgh, C. (2004). Revealing delay in collaborative environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, (pp. 503-510). New York, NY: ACM Press.
13. Gutwin, C. & Greenberg, S. (1999). The effects of workspace awareness support on the usability of real-time distributed groupware. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6(3), 243-281.
14. Haag, S., Raja, M.K. & Schkade, L.L. (1996). Quality function deployment usage in software development. Communications of the ACM, 39(1), 41-49.
15. Hill, J. & Gutwin, C. (2003). Awareness support in a groupware widget toolkit. In Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, (pp. 258-267). New York, NY: ACM Press. Retrieved 24 December, 2008 from http://hci.usask.ca/publications/2003/maui-group03.pdf (Archived by WebCite®at http://www.webcitation.org/5dJfpLGgC)
16. Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T. & Andersen, H. (1994). Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. (pp. 429-439). New York, NY: ACM Press.
17. John, B.E. & Kieras, D.E. (1996). Using GOMS foruser interface design and evaluation: which technique? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(4), 287-319. Retrieved 24 December, 2008 from https://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/74628/1/74628.pdf (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5dJgMtnqv)
18. Kieras, D. (2003). GOMS models for task analysis. In D. Diaper & N. Stanton (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 83-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Kieras, D.E. & Santoro, T.P. (2004). Computational GOMS modeling of a complex team task: lessons learned. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, April 24-29, 2004 (pp. 97-104). New York, NY: ACM Press.
20. Malone, T.W. & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87-119.
21. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Min, D., Koo, S., Chung, Y.H. & Kim, B. (1999). Distributed GOMS: an extension of GOMS to group task. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Tokyo, Japan 12-15 October, 1999. Volume 5. (pp. 720-725). NewYork, NY: IEEE Press
23. Olson, J. & Olson, G. (1990). The growth of cognitive modeling in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 5(2), 221-265.
24. Pinelle, D. & Gutwin, C. (2002). Groupware walkthrough: adding context to groupware usability evaluation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Changing our World, Changing Ourselves, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, (pp. 455-462). New York, NY: ACM Press.
25. Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C. & Greenberg, S. (2003). Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 10(4), 281-311. Retrieved 24 December, 2008 from http://bit.ly/VyJj
26. Rajan, S., Craig, S.D., Gholson, B., Person, N.K. & Graesser, A.C. (2001). AutoTutor: incorporating back-channel feedback and other human-like conversational behaviors into an intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Speech Technology, 4(2), 117-126.
27. van der Veer, G. & van Welie, M. (2000). Task based groupware design: putting theory into practice. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, New York, NY, USA. (pp. 326-337). New York, NY: ACM Press. Retrieved 24 December, 2008 from http://www.cs.vu.nl/~gerrit/gta/docs/Dis2000.pdf (Archived by WebCite®at http://www.webcitation.org/5dJiINa43)
28. Wensveen, S.A.G., Djajadiningrat, J.P. & Overbeeke, C.J. (2004). Interaction frogger: a design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, Cambridge, Mass., USA. (pp. 177-184). New York, NY: ACM Press. Retrieved 24 December, 2008 from http://bit.ly/hBPX (Archived by WebCite®at http://www.webcitation.org/5dJihkHwb)