GRAPPA-based susceptibility-weighted imaging of normal volunteers and patients with brain tumor at 7 T

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 480-488

  Lupo, Janine M ^a   Banerjee, Suchandrima ^a,b   Hammond, Kathryn E ^a,b   Kelley, Douglas A C ^c   Xu, Duan ^a   Chang, Susan M ^b   Vigneron, Daniel B ^a,b   Majumdar, Sharmila ^a,b   Nelson, Sarah J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c GE HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

7 T; Brain tumor; Parallel imaging; SWI

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN BLOOD VESSEL; BRAIN CALCIFICATION; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CALIBRATION; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GENERALIZED AUTOCALIBRATING PARTIALLY PARALLEL ACQUISITION-BASED SUSCEPTIBILITY-WEIGHTED IMAGING; GLIOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MICROVASCULARIZATION; MONITORING; NEUROIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THERAPY EFFECT; TUMOR NECROSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 63349101291     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Haacke E.M., Xu Y., Cheng Y.C., and Reichenbach J.R. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 52 3 (2004) 612-618
2. Sehgal V., Delproposto Z., Haacke E.M., Tong K.A., Wycliffe N., Kido D.K., et al. Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 22 4 (2005) 439-450
3. Sehgal V., Delproposto Z., Haddar D., Haacke E.M., Sloan A.E., Zamorano L.J., et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor contrast in the study of brain masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 24 1 (2006) 41-51
4. Ladd M.E. High-field-strength magnetic resonance: potential and limits. Top Magn Reson Imaging 18 2 (2007) 139-152
5. Blaimer M., Breuer F., Mueller M., Heidemann R.M., Griswold M.A., and Jakob P.M. SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: how to choose the optimal method. Top Magn Reson Imaging 15 4 (2004) 223-236
6. Griswold M.A., Jakob P.M., Heidemann R.M., Nittka M., Jellus V., Wang J., et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 47 6 (2002) 1202-1210
7. Pruessmann K.P., Weiger M., Scheidegger M.B., and Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42 5 (1999) 952-962
8. Sodickson D.K., and Manning W.J. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 38 4 (1997) 591-603
9. Heidemann R.M., Griswold M.A., Haase A., and Jakob P.M. VD-AUTO-SMASH imaging. Magn Reson Med 45 6 (2001) 1066-1074
10. Jakob P.M., Griswold M.A., Edelman R.R., and Sodickson D.K. AUTO-SMASH: a self-calibrating technique for SMASH imaging. SiMultaneous Acquisition of Spatial Harmonics. Magma 7 1 (1998) 42-54
11. Park J., Zhang Q., Jellus V., Simonetti O., and Li D. Artifact and noise suppression in GRAPPA imaging using improved k-space coil calibration and variable density sampling. Magn Reson Med 53 1 (2005) 186-193
12. Wang Z., Wang J., and Detre J.A. Improved data reconstruction method for GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med 54 3 (2005) 738-742
13. Sedlacik J., Herrmann K., Rauscher A., and Reichenbach J.R. SWI using different k-space undersampling mechanisms. Proceedings from the 13th Annual International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Meeting. May 7-13, Miami, FL, (2005)
14. Lupo J.M., Barnerjee S., Kelley D.A.C., Xu D., Vigneron D.B., Majumdar S., et al. Partially-parallel, susceptibility-weighted MR imaging of brain vasculature at 7 Tesla using sensitivity encoding and an autocalibrating parallel technique. Proceedings from the 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE-EMBS. August 30-September 3, New York, NY (2006)
15. Banerjee S., Choudhury S., Han E.T., Brau A.C., Morze C.V., Vigneron D.B., et al. Autocalibrating parallel imaging of in vivo trabecular bone microarchitecture at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 56 5 (2006) 1075-1084
16. Bydder M., Larkman D.J., and Hajnal J.V. Combination of signals from array coils using image-based estimation of coil sensitivity profiles. Magn Reson Med 47 3 (2002) 539-548
17. Wald L.L., Carvajal L., Moyher S.E., Nelson S.J., Grant P.E., Barkovich A.J., et al. Phased array detectors and an automated intensity-correction algorithm for high-resolution MR imaging of the human brain. Magn Reson Med 34 3 (1995) 433-439
18. Dietrich O., Reeder S., Reiser M.F., and Schoenberg S.O. Influence of parallel imaging and other reconstruction techniques on the measurement of signal-to-noise ratios. Proceedings from the 13th Annual International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Meeting. May 7-13 (2005) 158 [Miami, FL]
19. Rauscher A., Barth M., Reichenbach J.R., Stollberger R., and Moser E. Automated unwrapping of MR phase images applied to BOLD MR-venography at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 18 2 (2003) 175-180
20. Lupo J.M., Kelley D.A.C., Xu D., Vigneron D.B., and Nelson S.J. Susceptibility-weighted imaging at 3T and 7T using multi-channel phased array coils and SENSE. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. May 8-12, Seattle, WA (2006)
21. Xu Y., and Haacke E.M. The role of voxel aspect ratio in determining apparent vascular phase behavior in susceptibility weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 24 2 (2006) 155-160