Investigation of the dermal sensitizing potential of traditional medical extracts in local lymph node assays

Experimental Biology and Medicine

Volumn 234, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 306-313

  Lv, Lei ^a   Yan, Guang Yan ^a   Zhao, Ying Lan ^a   He, Xiao Juan ^a   Jiang, Xing ^a   Zhuo, Yan Qiang ^a   Wang, Yan Li ^b   Wang, Li ^a   Cen, Xiao Bo ^a,c  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TIANJIN CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (China)

^c NONE   (China)

Author keywords

Flow cytometry; Local lymph node assay; Skin sensitization; Traditional medical extracts

Indexed keywords

BORNEOLUM EXTRACT; CD45 ANTIGEN; CD69 ANTIGEN; MOSCHUS EXTRACT; MYRRH EXTRACT; OLIBANUM EXTRACT; PLANT EXTRACT; SENNA EXTRACT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; IRRITANT AGENT; LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN; T LYMPHOCYTE ANTIGEN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BARK; CD3+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CD8+ T LYMPHOCYTE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHINESE HERB; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPTEROCARPACEAE; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; LYMPHOCYTE PROLIFERATION; LYMPHOCYTE SUBPOPULATION; MEDICINAL PLANT; MIMULUS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; SENNA; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN SENSITIZATION; TRADITIONAL MEDICINE; ANIMAL; CBA MOUSE; CYTOLOGY; DERMIS; DRUG EFFECT; EAR; HISTOLOGY; IMMUNOLOGY; LYMPH NODE; LYMPHOCYTE; METABOLISM; ORGAN SIZE;

CINNAMOMUM AROMATICUM; COMMIPHORA; MOSCHUS; MUS;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD; ANTIGENS, DIFFERENTIATION, T-LYMPHOCYTE; CELL PROLIFERATION; DERMIS; EAR; FLOW CYTOMETRY; IRRITANTS; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHOCYTES; MICE; MICE, INBRED CBA; ORGAN SIZE; PLANT EXTRACTS; PLANTS, MEDICINAL;

EID: 63349095282     PISSN: 15353702     EISSN: 15353699     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3181/0809-RM-281     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Kimber I, Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Dearman RJ. Allergic contact dermatitis. Int Immunopharmacol 2:201-211, 2002.
2. Qiu Y, Lu X, Pang T, Zhu S, Kong H, Xu G. Study of traditional Chinese medicine volatile oils from different geographical origins by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time of-flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC-TOFMS) in combination with multivariate analysis. J Pharm Biomed Anal 43:1721-1727, 2007.
3. Su S, Hua Y, Duan JA, Shang E, Tang Y, Bao X, Lu Y, Ding A. Hypothesis of active components in volatile oil from a Chinese herb formulation, 'Shao-Fu-Zhu-Yu decoction', using GC-MS and chemometrics. J Sep. Sci 31:1085-1091, 2008.
4. Guarneri F, Barbuzza O, Vaccaro M, Galtieri G. Allergic contact dermatitis and asthma caused by limonene in a labourer handling citrus fruits. Contact Dermatitis 58:315-316, 2008.
5. Dekebo A, Dagne E, Sterner O. Furanosesquiterpenes from Commiphora sphaerocarpa and related adulterants of true myrrh. Fitoterapia 73:48-55, 2002.
6. Dolara P, Corte B, Ghelardini C, Pugliese AM, Cerbai E, Menichetti S, Lo Nostro A. Local anaesthetic, antibacterial and antifungal properties of sesquiterpenes from myrrh. Planta Med 66:356-358, 2000.
7. Hamm S, Bleton J, Connan J, Tchapla A. A chemical investigation by headspace SPME and GC-MS of volatile and semi-volatile terpenes in various olibanum samples. Phytochemistry 66:1499-1514, 2005.
8. Paulsen E, Chistensen LP, Andersen KE. Cosmetics and herbal remedies with Compositae plant extracts-are they tolerated by Compositae-allergic patients. Contact Dermatitis 58:15-23, 2008.
9. Vilar Mdo L, Diógenes MJ, Vilar JL, Filho JG, D'arc Pereira Dantas J, De Souza JA, de Morais SM. Contact dermatitis associated with Astronium urundeuva (allemao) Engl., a traditional medicinal plant from Brazil. Contact Dermatitis 51:311, 2004.
10. Simpson EL, Law SV, Storrs FJ. Prevalence of botanical extract allergy in patients with contact dermatitis. Dermatitis 15:67-72, 2004.
11. Basketter DA, Andersen KE, Liden C, Van Loveren H, Boman A, Kimber I, Alanko K, Berggren E. Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation. Contact Dermatitis 52:39-43, 2005.
12. Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Kimber I. The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 26:293-301, 2007.
13. Basketter D, Cockshott A, Corsini E, Gerberick GF, Idehara K, Kimber I, Van Loveren H, Matheson J, Mehling A, Omori T, Rovida C, Sozu T, Takeyoshi M, Casati S. An evaluation of performance standards and non-radioactive endpoints for the local lymph node assay. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 65. Altern Lab Anim 36: 243-257, 2008.
14. Basketter D, Darlenski R, Fluhr JW. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 21:191-202, 2008.
15. Lalko J, Api AM. Investigation of the dermal sensitization potential of various essential oils in the local lymph node assay. Food Chem Toxicol 44:739-746, 2006.
16. Kreiling R, Hollnagel HM, Hareng L, Eigler D, Lee MS, Griem P, Dreessen B, Kleber M, Albrecht A, Garcia C, Wendel A. Comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of unsaturated compounds as assessed by the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT). Food Chem Toxicol 46:1896-1904, 2008.
17. Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Kimber I. Strategies for identifying false positive responses in predictive skin sensitization tests. Food Chem Toxicol 36:327-333, 1998.
18. Burchiel SW, Kerkvliet NL, Gerberick GF, Lawrence DA, Ladics GS. Assessment of immunotoxicity by multiparameter flow cytometry. Fundam Appl Toxicol 38:38-54, 1997.
19. Gerberick GF, Cruse LW, Miller CM, Ridde GM. Selective modulation of B-cell activation markers CD86 and I-Ak on murine draining lymph node cells following allergen or irritant treatment. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 159:142-151, 1999.
20. Gerberick GF, Cruse LW, Ryan CA, Hulette BC, Chaney JG, Skinner RA, Dearman RJ, Kimber I. Use of a B cell marker (B220) to discriminate between allergens and irritants in the local lymph node assay. Toxicol Sci 68:420-428, 2002.
21. Manetz TS, Meade BJ. Development of a flow cytometry assay for the identification and differentiation of chemicals with the potential to elicit irritation, IgE-mediated, or T cell-mediated hypersensitivity responses. Toxicol Sci 48:206-217, 1999.
22. Gerberick GF, Cruse LW, Ryan CA. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry. Methods 19:48-55, 1999.
23. Gerberick GF, Cruse LW, Miller CM, Ridder GM. Selective modulation of B-cell activation markers CD86 and I-Ak on murine draining lymph node cells following allergen or irritant treatment. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 159:142-151, 1999.
24. De Jong WH, Tentij M, Spiekstra SW, Vandebriel RJ, Van LH. Determination of the sensitising activity of the rubber contact sensitisers TMTD, ZDMC, MBT and DEA in a modified local lymph node assay and the effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate pretreatment on local lymph node responses. Toxicology 176:123-134, 2002.
25. Ikarashi Y, Tsukamoto Y, Tsuchiya T, Nakamura A. Influence of irritants on lymph node cell proliferation and the detection of contact sensitivity to met al. salts in the murine local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 29:128-132, 1993.
26. Montelius J, Wahlkvist H, Boman A, Wahlberg JE. Murine local lymph node assay for predictive testing of allergenicity: two irritants caused significant proliferation. Acta Derm Venereol 78:433-437, 1998.
27. Homey B, von Schilling C, Blümel J, Schuppe HC, Ruzicka T, Ahr HJ, Lehmann P, Vohr HW. An integrated model for the differentiation of chemical-induced allergic and irritant skin reactions. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 153:83-94, 1998.
28. Al-Suwaidan SN, Gad el Rab MO, Al-Fakhiry S, Al Hoqail IA, Al- Maziad A, Sherif AB. Allergic contact dermatitis from myrrh, a topical herbal medicine used to promote healing. Contact Dermatitis 39:137, 1998.
29. Gallo R, Rivara G, Cattarini G, Cozzani E, Guarrera M. Allergic contact dermatitis from myrrh. Contact Dermatitis 41:230-231, 1999.
30. Lee JK, Park JH, Park SH, Kim HS, Oh HY. A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 48:53-61, 2002.
31. Homey B, von Schilling C, Blümel J, Schuppe HC, Ruzicka T, Jürgen Ahr H, Lehmann P, Vohr HW. An integrated model for the differentiation of chemical-induced allergic and irritant skin reactions. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 153:83-94, 1998.
32. Clottens FL, Breyssens A, De Raeve H, Demedts M, Nemery B. Assessment of the ear swelling test and the local lymph node assay in hamsters. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 35:167-172, 1996.
33. Suda A, Yamashita M, Tabei M, Taguchi K, Vohr HW, Tsutsui N, Suzuki R, Kikuchi K, Sakaguchi K, Mochizuki K, Nakamura K. Local lymph node assay with non-radioisotope alternative endpoints. J Toxicol Sci 27:205-218, 2002.