A Self-Agency Bias in Preschoolers' Causal Inferences

Developmental Psychology

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 597-603

  Kushnir, Tamar ^a   Wellman, Henry M ^b   Gelman, Susan A ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

causal inference; causal learning; cognitive development; intentional action; probabilistic reasoning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; ILLUSION; IMITATION; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; UNCERTAINTY; VISION;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONCEPT FORMATION; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; INTENTION; JUDGMENT; MALE; ORIENTATION; PROBABILITY LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; UNCERTAINTY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 63149137744     PISSN: 00121649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0014727     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alloy L., and Abramson L. Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108 (1979) 441-485
2. Astington J.W. The paradox of intention: Assessing children's metarepresentational understanding. In: Malle B.F., Moses L.J., and Baldwin D.A. (Eds). Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (2001), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 85-103
3. Foley M., and Ratner H. Children's recoding memory for collaboration: A way of learning from others. Cognitive Development 13 (1998) 91-108
4. Gelman S., and Wellman H. Insides and essence: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition 38 (1991) 213-244
5. Gopnik A., Glymour C., Sobel D.M., Schulz L.E., Kushnir T., and Danks D. A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 1-30
6. Gopnik A., and Meltzoff A. Words, thoughts, and theories (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
7. Gopnik A., Sobel D.M., Schulz L., and Glymour C. Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: Two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. Developmental Psychology 37 (2001) 620-629
8. Haggard P. Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (2005) 290-295
9. Hickling A., and Wellman H. The emergence of children's causal explanations and theories: Evidence from everyday conversation. Developmental Psychology 37 (2001) 668-683
10. Jenkins H.H., and Ward W.C. Judgement of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs 79 (1965)
11. Kushnir T., and Gopnik A. Children infer causal strength from probabilities and interventions. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 678-683
12. Kushnir T., and Gopnik A. Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions. Developmental Psychology 44 (2007) 186-196
13. Kushnir T., Wellman H.M., and Gelman S.A. The role of preschoolers' social understanding in evaluating the informativeness of causal interventions. Cognition 107 (2008) 1084-1092
14. Lagnado D.A., and Sloman S. The advantage of timely intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 (2004) 856-876
15. Langer E. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (1975) 311-328
16. Meltzoff A.N., and Moore M.K. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198 (1977) 75-78
17. Piaget J. The construction of reality in the child (1954), Basic Books, New York
18. Rogoff B. Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context (1990), Oxford University Press, New York
19. Schulz L.E., Bonawitz E.B., and Griffiths T. Can being scared make your tummy ache? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence and preschoolers/causal inferences. Developmental Psychology 43 (2007) 1124-1139
20. Schulz L.E., and Gopnik A. Causal learning across domains. Developmental Psychology 40 (2004) 162-176
21. Schulz L.E., Gopnik A., and Glymour C. Preschool children learn about causal structure from conditional interventions. Developmental Science 10 (2007) 322-332
22. Shanks D.R., and Dickinson A. Associative accounts of causality judgment. In: Bower G.H. (Ed). The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory 21 (1987), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 229-261
23. Shultz T.R. Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 47 Serial No. 194 (1982)
24. Shultz T.R., and Wells D. Judging the intentionality of action-outcomes. Developmental Psychology 21 (1985) 83-89
25. Sommerville J.A., and Hammond A.J. Treating another's actions as one's own: Children's memory of and learning from joint activity. Developmental Psychology 43 (2007) 1003-1018
26. Sommerville J., and Woodward A. Pulling out the intentional structure of action: The relation between action processing and action production in infancy. Cognition 95 (2005) 1-30
27. Steyvers M., Tenenbaum J.B., Wagenmakers E.J., and Blum B. Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions. Cognitive Science 27 (2003) 453-489
28. Thompson S., Kyle D., Osgood A., Quist R., Phillips D., and McClure M. Illusory control and motives for control: The role of connection and intentionality. Motivation and Emotion 28 (2004) 315-330
29. Waldmann M., and Hagmayer Y. Seeing versus doing: Two modes of accessing causal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (2005) 216-227
30. Watson J.S., and Ramey C.T. Reactions to response-contingent stimulation in early infancy. In: Oates J., and Sheldon S. (Eds). Cognitive development in infancy (1972), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 77-85
31. Wegner D. The illusion of conscious will (2002), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA