An efficient framework for brain tumor segmentation in magnetic resonance images

2008 1st International Workshops on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications, IPTA 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Bourouis, Sami ^a   Hamrouni, Kamel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TUNIS EL MANAR   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Brain tumor segmentation; Expectation maximization algorithm; MRI; Region competition based level set

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; IMAGING SYSTEMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

BRAIN TUMOR SEGMENTATION; BRAIN TUMORS; CLINICAL PRACTICES; CONVENTIONAL METHODS; EXPECTATION MAXIMIZATION ALGORITHM; LEVEL-SET APPROACHES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGES; MRI; PROCESSING TIME; REGION-BASED; REGION-COMPETITION BASED LEVEL-SET;

TUMORS;

EID: 63149133858     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IPTA.2008.4743791     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. J A. Sethian. Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
2. V. Caselles, R. Kimmel, and G. S apiro. Geodesic Active Contours. Inter, Journal Comput. Vision, 22(1):61-97, 1997.
3. R. Malladi, J A. Sethian, and B.C. Vemuri. Shape modeling with front propagation A leyel set approach. IEEE Trans, Pattern Anal., Machine Intell, 17(2):158-174, 1995.
4. N, Moon and al. Automatic Brain and Tumor Segmentation MICCAI, 372-379, 2002.
5. M.B. Cuadra and al. Atlas-based Segmentation of Pathological MR Brain Using a Model of Lesion Growth. IEEE Trans, Medical Imaging, 23:1301-1314, 2004.
6. M. Prastawa and al, A brain tumor segmentation framework. based on outlier detection. MedLA, 8:275-283, 2004.
7. S. Ho, E. Bullitt and G. Gerig. Level set evolution with region competition: Automatic. 3-D segmentation of brain tumors, 16th Int, Conf on Pattern Recognition ICPR, 20(8):532-535, 2002.
8. K.V. Leemput and al. Automated Segment ation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions by Model Outlier Detection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 20(8): 2001.
9. M. Kaus. Contributions to the Automated Segmentation of Brain Tumors in Magnetic Resonance Images. PhD Thesis, University of' Erlangen, 2000.
10. M, Clark, Knowledge-Guided Processing of Magnetic Resonance Images of the B rain, PhD Thesis, University of South, Florida, Tampa, 2000.
11. A.P. Dempster and al. Maximum likelihood from in complete data via the em algorithm, Journal of the Royal Stati stical Society, 1:1 -38, 1977.
12. P. Perona and J. Malik, Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans, Med. Imaging, 12:629-639, 1990.
13. S.M. Smith Robust Automated Brain Extraction Human Brain Mapping, 17:143-155, 2002.
14. R. Whitaker. Reducing Aliasing Artifacts in Iso-Surfaces of Binary Volumes. IEEE Volume Visual, and Graph, Symposium, 21:23-32, 2000.
15. W.E. Lorensen and H.E. Chine. Marching cubes: A high-resolution 3-D surface construction algorithm. ACM Comput. Graph, 21:161-170, 1987.
16. L. Ibanez W. Schroeder and J. Cates, The ITK Software Guide. 2nd edition, 2005.
17. J.P. Sem, Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, Academic Press Inc, 1982.
18. C. B aillard and al. Cooperation between Leyel Set Techniques and 3D Registration for the Segmentation of Brain Structures. ICPR, 991-994, 2000.
19. J.S. Suri and S. Singh and L. Reden. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Techniques for 2-D and 3-D MR Cerebral Cortical Segmentation Part I): A State-of-the-Art Review, Pattern Analy and Appli, 5:46-764, 2002.
20. A.W.C. Liew and H. Yan Current Methods in the Automatic Tissue Segmentation of 3D Magnetic Resonance Brain Images. Current Medical Imaging Reviews, 2:91-103, 2006.
21. A.E. Lefohn. J. Cates and R. Whitaker. Interactive, CPU-based level sits for 3D brain tumor segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, 564-572, 2003.
22. S. Bourouis, K. Hamrouni and N. Betrouni. Automatic MRI Brain Segmentation with Combined Atlas-based Classification and Level-set approach. 5th International Conference on Image Analysis and Recognition, ICIAR 2008, 770-778, 2008.
23. S.K. Warfield, M. Kaus, F.A. Jolesz and R. Kikinis. Adaptive, Template Moderated, Spatially Varying Statistical Classification. Medical Image Analysis, 20(8):43-55, 2000.
24. M. Kaus, S.K. Warfield, A. Nabavi, P.M. Black, FA. Jolesz and Ron Kikinis. Automated Segmentation of MRI of Brain Tumors. Radiology, http://www.spl.harvard.edu/Special:PubDB-View?dspaceid=169., 586-91, 2001.