Cooperation between level set techniques and dense 3D registration for the segmentation of brain structures

Proceedings-International Conference on Pattern Recognition

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 991-994

  Baillard, C ^a   Hellier, P ^a   Barillot, C ^a  

^a CAMPUS DE BEAULIEU   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUMERICAL METHODS; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

COOPERATIVE STRATEGY; IMPLICIT FUNCTION; INTENSITY VALUES; LEVEL-SET TECHNIQUES; MULTI RESOLUTIONS; NUMBER OF ITERATIONS; REGISTRATION PROCESS; SEGMENTATION METHODS;

ITERATIVE METHODS;

EID: 0000882344     PISSN: 10514651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/ICPR.2000.905632     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. D. Adalsteinsson and J. Sethian. A fast level set method for propagating interfaces. J. of Computational Physics, 118(2):269-277, 1995.
2. O. Amadieu, E. Debreuve, M. Barlaud, and G. Aubert. Inward and outward curve evolution using level set method. In ICIP, Kobe, Japan, oct. 1999.
3. V. Caselles, R. Kimmel, and G. Sapiro. Geodesic active contours. IJCV, 22:61-79, 1997.
4. B. Dawant, S. Hartmann, J.-P. Thirion, F. Maes, D. Vandermeulen, and P. Demaerel. Automatic 3-D segmentation of internal structures of the head in MR images using a combination of similarity and free-form transformations: Part i, methodology and validation on normal subjects. IEEE Tr. on Medical Imaging, 18(10):909-916, oct. 1999.
5. P. Hellier, C. Barillot, E. Mémin, and P. Pérez. An energy-based framework for dense 3d registration of volumetric brain image. In IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, jun. 2000.
6. G. Hermosillo, O. Faugeras, and J. Gomes. Cortex unfolding using Level-Set methods. Technical Report 3663, Inria, apr. 1999.
7. B. Horn and B. Schunck, Determining optical flow. Artificial Intelligence, 17:185-203, auf. 1981.
8. R. Kimmel, N. Kiryati, and A. Bruckstein. Analyzing and synthesizing images by evolving curves with the Osher-Sethian method. IJCV, 24(1):37-55, 1997.
9. R. Malladi, J. Sethian, and B. Vemuri. Shape modeling with front propagation: A level set approach. IEEE Tr. on PAMI, 17(2):158-175, feb. 1995.
10. S. Osher and J. Sethian. Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulation. J. of Computational Physics, 79:12-49, 1988.
11. C. Papin, P. Bouthemy, E. Mémin, and G. Rochard. Tracking and characterization of highly deformable cloud structure. In ECCV, Dublin, Ireland, jun. 2000.
12. N. Paragios and R. Deriche. Geodesic active regions for supervised texture segmentation. In ICCV, volume 2, pages 926-932, Corfou, Grece, sep. 1999.
13. R. Whitaker. A level-set approach to 3D reconstruction from range data. IJCV, 29(3):203-231, 1998.
14. A. Yezzi, A. Tsai, and A. Willsky. Binary and ternary flows for image segmentation. In ICIP, Kobe, Japan, oct. 1999.
15. X. Zeng, L. Staib, R. Schultz, and J. Duncan. Segmentation and measurement of the cortex from 3D MR images using coupled surfaces propagation. IEEE Tr. on Medical Imaging, 18(10):148-157, oct. 1999.
16. X. Zeng, L. Staib, R. Schultz, H. Tagare, L. Win, and J. Duncan. A new approach to 3D sulcal ribbon finding from MR images. In MICCAI, pages 148-157, sep. 1999.