Near space functioning of the human angular and supramarginal gyri

Journal of Neuropsychology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 31-43

  Bjoertomt, Otto ^b   Cowey, Alan ^a   Walsh, Vincent ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 63049104150     PISSN: 17486645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/174866408X394604     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ashbridge, E., Walsh, V, & Cowey, A. (1997). Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologica, 35 1221-1289.
2. Berti, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neurosdence, 12 415-420.
3. Bjoertomt, O., Cowey, A., & Walsh, V. (2002). Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain, 125 2012-2022.
4. Bodegard, A., Geyer, S., Grefkes, C, Zilles, K., & Roland, P. E. (2001). Hierarchical processing of tactile shape in the human brain. Neuron, 31 317-328.
5. Bonin, G., & Bailey, P. (1947). The neocortex of rnacaca mulatta. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
6. Cowey, A., Small, M., & Ellis, S. (1994). Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia, 32 1059-1066.
7. De Renzi, E., Motti, E, & Nichelli, P (1980). Imitating gestures. A quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. Archives of Neurolology, 37 6-10.
8. Driver, J., & Vuilleumier, P (2001). Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition, 79 39-88.
9. Duhamel, J. R., Bremmer, E, BenHamed, S., & Graf, W. (1997). Spatial invariance of visual receptive fields in parietal cortex neurons. Nature, 389 845-848.
10. Dumoulin, S., Bittar, R., Kabani, N., Baker, C, Goualher, G. L, Pike, G. B., et al. (2000). A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: A quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning. Cerebral Cortex, 10 454-463.
11. Economo, C, & Parker, S. (1929). The cytoarchitectonics of the human cerebral cortex. London: Humphrey Milford Oxford University Press.
12. Engelkamp, J. (1998). Memory for actions. Hove: Psychology Press. Fame, A., & Ladavas, E. (2000). Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport, 11 1645-1649.
13. Fierro, B., Brighina, E, Oliveri, M., Piazza, A., La Bua, V, Buffa, D., et al. (2000). Contralateral neglect induced by right posterior parietal rTMS in healthy subjects. Neuroreport, 11, 1519-1521.
14. Gardner, E. R, Ro, J. Y, Debowy, D., & Ghosh, S. (1999). Facilitation of neuronal activity in somatosensory and posterior parietal cortex during prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 127 329-354.
15. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15 20-25.
16. Graziano, M. S., Yap, G. S., & Gross, C. G. (1994). Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science, 266 1054-1057.
17. Green, D. M., & Swets,J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory andpsychophysics. New York: Wiley.
18. Halligan, P W., & Marshall, J. C. (1991). Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature, 350, 498-500.
19. Heilman, K. M., & Adams, D. J. (2003). Callosal neglect. Archives of Neurology, 60 276-279. Jackson, S. (2001). 'Action binding': Dynamic interactions between vision and touch. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5 505-506.
20. Kontsevich, L., & Tyler, C. (1999). Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold. Vision Research, 39 2729-2737.
21. Laeng, B., Brennen, T, Johannessen, K., Holmen, K., & Elvestad, R. (2002). Multiple reference frames in neglect? An investigation of the object-centred frame and the dissociation between "near" and "far" from the body by use of a mirror. Cortex, 38 511-528.
22. Leibovitch, E S., Black, S. E., Caldwell, C. B., Ebert, P. L, Ehrlich, L. E., & Szalai, J. P. (1998). Brain-behavior correlations in hemi spatial neglect using CT and SPECT: The Sunny brook stroke study. Neurology, 50 901-908.
23. Makuuchi, M., Kaminaga, T, & Sugishita, M. (2003). Both parietal lobes are involved in drawing: A functional MRI study and implications for constructional apraxia. Cognitive Brain Research, 16 338-347.
24. Maravita, A., Husain, M., Clarke, K., & Driver, J. (2001). Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: Evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia, 39. 580-585.
25. Mc26Court, M. E., & Garlinghouse, M. (2000). Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: Pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extra personal space. Cortex, 36 715-731.
26. Mort, D. J., Malhotra, P., Mannan, S. K., Rorden, C, Pambakian, A., Kennard, C, et al. (2003). The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain, 126 1986-1997.
27. Murata, A., Fadiga, L, Fogassi, L, Gallese, V, Raos, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 2226-2230.
28. Murata, A., Gallese, V, Luppino, G., Kaseda, M., & Sakata, H. (2000). Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area ATP. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83 2580-2601.
29. Pellegrino, G., Ladavas, E., & Fame, A. (1997). Seeing where your hands are. Nature, 388 730.
30. Rafal, R. D. (1994). Neglect. Current Biology, 4 231-236.
31. Rizzolatti, G., Berti, A., & Gallese, V. (2000). Spatial neglect: Neurophysiological bases, cortical circuits and theories. In F. Boiler, J. Grafman, & G. Rizzolatti (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (2nd ed., Vol. I, pp. 503-537). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
32. Rizzolatti, G., & Luppino, G. (2001). The cortical motor system. Neuron, 31 889-901.
33. Rizzolatti, G., & Matelli, M. (2003). Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research, 153 146-157.
34. Rushworth, M. E, Ellison, A., & Walsh, V. (2001). Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nature Neuroscience, 4 656-661.
35. Russ, M. O., Mack, W, Grama, C. R., Lanfermann, H., & Knopf, M. (2003). Enactment effect in memory: Evidence concerning the function of the supramarginal gyrus. Experimental Brain Research, 149 497-504.
36. Vallar, G. (1998). Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2 87-97.
37. Vuilleumier, P., Valenza, N., Mayer, E., Reverdin, A., & Landis, T. (1998). Near and far visual space in unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 43 406-410.
38. Wassermann, E. M. (1998). Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report and suggested guidelines from the international workshop on the safety of repetitive magnetic stimulation June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 108, 1-16.
39. Weiss, P. H., Marshall, J. C., Wunderlich, G., Tellmann, L, Halligan, R W, Freund, H. J., et al. (2000).
40. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: A physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain, 123 2531-2541.
41. Weiss, P. H., Marshall, J. C, Zilles, K., & Fink, G. R. (2003). Are action and perception in near and far space additive or interactive factors? Neuroimage, 18 837-846.