Laser pointers and a touch screen: Intuitive interfaces for autonomous mobile manipulation for the motor impaired

ASSETS'08: The 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 225-232

  Choi, Young Sang ^a   Anderson, Cressel D ^c   Glass, Jonathan D ^b   Kemp, Charles C ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Design; Experimentation; Human factors; Performance

Indexed keywords

AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS; ASSISTIVE; EXPERIMENTATION; HUMAN FACTORS; HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS; INTUITIVE INTERFACES; LASER POINTERS; LINE OF SIGHTS; MOBILE MANIPULATIONS; MOTOR IMPAIRMENTS; MULTIPLE INTERFACES; PERFORMANCE; PICK-UP; RATING SCALE; REMOTE OBJECTS; SUBSTANTIAL VARIATIONS; TOUCH SCREEN INTERFACES; TOUCH SCREENS; UPPER LIMBS; USER STUDIES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; LANDING; LOCATION; MOTORS; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS; USER INTERFACES;

LASERS;

EID: 62949181231     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1414471.1414512     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. [1 ] Bailey, R.W., Human performance engineering: designing high quality professional user interfaces for computer products, applications and systems. 1996: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
2. CaBelli, S., et al. Toward a Mobile Manipulator Service Robot for Human Assistance, in 1st Robocare Workshop. 2003. Roma, Italy.
3. Cedarbaum, J.M., et al., The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. BDNFALS Study Group (Phase III). J Neurol Sci, 1999. 169(1-2): p. 13-21.
4. Folmer, E. and J. Bosch, Architectingfor usability: a survey. The Journal of Systems & Software, 2004. 70(1-2): p. 61-78.
5. Forsyth, D.A. and J. Ponce, Computer Vision: a modern approach. 2002: Prentice Hall.
6. Graf, B., M. Hans, and R.D. Schraft, Care-O-bot II - Development of a next generation robotic home assistant. Autonomous Robots, 2004.16(2): p. 193-205.
7. Graf, B., M. Hans, and R.D. Schrft, Mobile Robot Assistants - Issues for Dependable Operation in Direct Cooperation With Humans. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine: Special Issue on Human Centered Robotics and Dependability, 2004.11(2): p. 67-77.
8. Helping Hands. Helping Hands, monkey helpers for the disabled. [cited Dec-17 2007]; Available from: http://www.helpinghandsmonkevs.org.
9. Huttenrauch, H. and K.S. Eklundh, Fetch-and-carry with CERO: observations from a long-term user study with a service robot. Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2002. Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Workshop on, 2002: p. 158-163.
10. Kaufmann, P., et al., The ALSFRS-Rpredicts survival time in an ALS clinic population. Neurology, 2005. 64(1): p. 38.
11. Kemp, C.C., A. Edsinger, and E. Torres-Jara, Challenges for Robot Manipulation in Human Environments. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2007.14(1): p. 20-29.
12. Kwee, H. and C Stanger, The Manus robot arm. Rehabilitation Robotics Newsletter, 1993. 5(2).
13. Lewis, J.R., Psychometric evaluation of an after-scenario questionnaire for computer usability studies: the ASQ. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 1991.23(1): p. 78-81.
14. Lewis, J.R., IBM Computer Usability SatisfactionQuestionnaires: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1995. 7(1): p. 57-78.
15. Lewis, J.R., Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 2002. 14(3&4): p. 463-488.
16. Nguyen, H., et al. El-E: An Assistive Robot that Fetches objects from Flat Surfaces, in Proceedings of "Robotic Helpers: User Interaction, Interfaces and Companions in Assistive and Therapy Robotics" an HRI Workshop. 2008.
17. Stanger, C.A., et al., Devices for assisting manipulation: a summary of user task priorities. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 1994. 2(4): p. 256-265.
18. Tsui, K., et al., Development and evaluation of a flexible interface for a wheelchair mounted robotic arm. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Human robot interaction, 2008: p. 105-112.
19. U.S. Census Bureau, 2005 American Community Survey (ACS). 2005, U.S. Census Bureau.
20. Yanco, H.A., J.L. Drury, and J. Scholtz, Beyond Usability Evaluation: Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction at a Major Robotics Competition. Human-Computer Interaction, 2004.19(1): p. 117-149.