Two types of single-peaked data: Correspondence analysis as an alternative to principal component analysis

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 3117-3128

  Polak, Marike ^a   Heiser, Willem J ^a   de Rooij, Mark ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION MATRICES; CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; DATA EXAMPLES; DATA MATRICES; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTIONS; EXPONENTIAL FUNCTIONS; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; QUADRATIC FUNCTIONS; RESPONSE MODELS;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 62849096826     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abraham R.E., Van H.L., Van Foeken I., Ingenhoven T.J.M., Tremonti W., Pieper de Vries I., De Groot J., Van't Spijker A., and Spinhoven P. The developmental profile. Journal of Personality Disorders 15 (2001) 457-473
2. Andrich D. A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding polytomous responses: Reconciling Thurstone and Likert methodologies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 49 (1996) 347-365
3. Andrich D., and Styles I.M. The structural relationship between attitude and behavior statements from the unfolding perspective. Psychological Methods 3 (1998) 454-469
4. Benzécri J.-P. Correspondence Analysis Handbook (1992), Marcel Dekker, New York
5. Coombs C.H. A Theory of Data (1964), Wiley, New York
6. Coombs C.H., and Kao R.C. On a connection between factor analysis and multidimensional unfolding. Psychometrika 25 (1960) 219-231
7. Davison M.L. On a metric unidimensional unfolding model for attitudinal and developmental data. Psychometrika 42 (1977) 523-548
8. De'ath G. Principal curves: A technique for indirect and direct gradient analysis. Ecology 80 (1999) 2237-2253
9. DeSarbo W.S., Kim J., Chan Choi S., and Spaulding M. A gravity based multidimensional scaling model for deriving spatial structures underlying consumer preference/choice judgements. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (2002) 91-100
10. Gifi A. Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis (1990), Wiley, Chicester
11. Greenacre M.J. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis (1984), Academic Press, New York
12. Greenacre M.J. Correspondence Analysis in Practice (1993), Academic Press, London
13. Greenacre, M.J., 2006. Tying up the loose end in simple correspondence analysis. Working paper
14. Greenacre M.J. Correspondence Analysis in Practice. second edition (2007), Chapman & Hall/CRC, London
15. Heiser, W.J., 1981. Unfolding analysis of proximity data. Ph.D. Thesis, Leiden, The Netherlands, Leiden University
16. Heiser W.J. Correspondence analysis. In: Smelser N.J., and Baltes P.B. (Eds). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2001), Pergamon, Oxford 2820-2824
17. Hill M.O. Reciprocal averaging: An eigenvector method of ordination. Journal of Ecology 61 (1973) 237-249
18. Hill M.O. Correspondence analysis: A neglected multivariate method. Applied Statistics 23 (1974) 340-354
19. Hill M.O., and Gauch H.G. Detrended correspondence analysis: An improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42 (1980) 47-58
20. Hubert L., Arabie P., and Meulman J. The representation of symmetric proximity data: Dimensions and classifications. The Computer Journal 41 (1998) 566-577
21. Ihm P., and van Groenewoud H. Correspondence analysis and Gaussian ordination. COMPSTAT Lectures 3 (1984) 5-60
22. Kendall M.G. Seriation from abundance matrices. In: Hodson F.R. (Ed). Mathematics in the Archeological and Historical Sciences (1971), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 215-252
23. Leclerc A. Quelques propriétés optimales en analyse des données, en termes de corrélation entre variables. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines 70 (1980) 51-67
24. Maraun M.D., and Rossi N.T. The extra-factor phenomenon revisited: Unidimensional unfolding as quadratic factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement 25 (2001) 77-87
25. Meulman J.J. Homogeneity Analysis of Incomplete Data (1982), DSWO Press, Leiden, The Netherlands
26. Noy-Meir I., and Austin M.P. Principal component ordination and simulated vegetational data. Ecology 51 (1970) 551-552
27. Roberts J.S., Donoghue J.R., and Laughlin J.E. A general item response theory model for unfolding unidimensional polytomous responses. Applied Psychological Measurement 24 (2000) 3-32
28. Roberts J.S., Laughlin J.E., and Wedell D.H. Validity issues in the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement 59 (1999) 211-233
29. Ross J., and Cliff N. A generalization of the interpoint distance model. Psychometrika 29 (1964) 167-176
30. Rost J., and Luo G. An application of a Rasch-based unfolding model to a questionnaire on adolescent centrism. In: Rost J., and Rolf L. (Eds). Applications of Latent Trait and Latent Class Models in the Social Sciences (1997), Waxmann Munster, New York
31. Schoenemann P.H. On metric multidimensional unfolding. Psychometrika 35 (1970) 349-366
32. Swan J.M.A. An examination of some ordination problems by use of simulated vegetational data. Ecology 51 (1970) 89-102
33. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics (2001), Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA
34. Ter Braak C.J.F. Correspondence analysis of incidence and abundance data: Properties in terms of a unimodal response model. Biometrics 41 (1985) 859-873
35. Ter Braak, C.J.F., 1987. Unimodal models to relate species to environment. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands
36. Ter Braak C.J.F. Partial canonical correspondence analysis. In: Bock H.H. (Ed). Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis (1988), North-Holland, Amsterdam 551-558
37. Ter Braak C.J.F., and Prentice I.C. A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18 (1988) 271-317
38. Ter Braak C.J.F., and Prentice I.C. A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 34 (2004) 235-282
39. Van de Velden M. Optimal scaling of paired comparison data. Journal of Classification 21 (2004) 89-109
40. Van Schuur W.H., and Kiers H.A.L. Why factor analysis often is the wrong model for analysing bipolar concepts and what model to use instead. Applied Psychological Measurement 18 (1994) 97-110
41. Van Schuur W.H., and Kruijtbosch M. Measuring subjective well-being: Unfolding the Bradburn affect balance scale. Social Indicators Research 36 (1995) 49-74
42. Zhu M., Hastie T.J., and Walther G. Constrained ordination analysis with flexible response functions. Ecological Modelling 187 (2005) 524-536