Validity issues in the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 211-233

  Roberts, James S ^a   Laughlin, James E ^b   Wedell, Douglas H ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033243620     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00131649921969811     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Andrich, D. (1988). The application of an unfolding model of the PIRT type to the measurement of attitude. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 33-51.
2. Andrich, D. (1996). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding polytomous responses: Reconciling Thurstone and Likert methodologies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 347-365.
3. Andrich, D., & Luo, G. (1993). A hyperbolic cosine latent trait model for unfolding dichotomous single-stimulus responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 253-276.
4. Barclay, J. E., & Weaver, H. B. (1962). Comparative reliabilities and the ease of construction of Thurstone and Likert attitude scales. Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 109-120.
5. Cliff, N., Collins, L. M., Zatkin, J., Gallipeau, D., & McCormick, D. J. (1988). An ordinal scaling method for questionnaire and other ordinal data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 83-97.
6. Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data. New York: Wiley.
7. DeSarbo, W. S., & Hoffman, D. L. (1986). Simple and weighted unfolding threshold models for the spatial representation of binary choice data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 247-264.
8. DeSarbo, W. S., & Hoffman, D. L. (1987). Constructing MDS joint spaces from binary choice data: A multidimensional unfolding threshold model for marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 40-54.
9. Edwards, A. L., & Kenney, K. C. (1946). A comparison of the Thurstone and Likert techniques of attitude scale construction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 72-83.
10. Ferguson, L. W. (1941). A study of the Likert technique of attitude scale construction. Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 51-57.
11. Flamer, S. (1983). Assessment of the multitrait-multimethod matrix validity of Likert scales via confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 275-308.
12. Green, B. F. (1954). Attitude measurement. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 335-369). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. Hoijtink, H. (1990). A latent trait model for dichotomous choice data. Psychometrika, 55, 641-656.
14. Hoijtink, H. (1991). The measurement of latent traits by proximity items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 153-169.
15. Jaccard, J., Weber, J., & Lundmark, J. (1975). A multitrait-multimethod analysis of four attitude assessment procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 149-154.
16. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5-53.
17. Likert, R., Roslow, S., & Murphy, G. (1934). A simple and reliable method of scoring the Thurstone attitude scales. Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 228-238.
18. Mueller, D. J. (1986). Measuring social attitudes: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
20. Reinsch, C. H. (1967). Smoothing by spline functicns. Numerishe Mathematik, 10, 177-183.
21. Rhoads, R. F., & Landy, F. J. (1973). Measurement of attitudes of industrial work groups toward psychology and testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 197-201.
22. Roberts, J. S. (1995). Item response theory approaches to attitude measurement (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 7089B.
23. Roberts, J. S., Donoghue, J. R., & Laughlin, J. E. (1996, June 28). A generalized item response model for unfolding responses from a graded scale. Paper presented at the 61st annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Banff, Alberta Canada.
24. Roberts, J. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (1996a). A unidimensional item response model for unfolding responses from a graded disagree-agree response scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 231-255.
25. Roberts, J. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (1996b). The graded infolding model: A unidimensional item response model for unfolding graded responses (R R-96-16). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
26. Safir, M. A. (1937). A comparative study of scales constructed by three psychophysical methods. Psychometrika, 2, 179-198.
27. Seiler, L. H., & Hough, R. L. (1970). Empirical comparisons of the Thurstone and Likert techniques. In G. Summers (Ed.), Attitude measuremint (pp. 159-173). Chicago: Rand McNally.
28. Thurstone, L. L. (1927a). Psychophysical analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 38, 368-389.
29. Thurstone, L. L. (1927b). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.
30. Thurstone, L. L. (1927c). The method of paired comparisons for social values. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26, 249-269.
31. Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. The American Journal of Sociology, 26, 249-269.
32. Thurstone, L. L., & Chave, E. J. (1929). The measure ment of attitude: A psychophysical method and some experiments with a scale for measuring attitude toward the church. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. van Schuur, W. H. (1984). Structure in political beliefs: A new model for stochastic unfolding with application to European party activists. Amsterdam: CT Press.
34. van Schuur, W. H. (1993). Nonparametric unidimensional unfolding for multicategory data. Political Analysis, 4, 41-74.
35. van Schuur, W. H., & Kiers, H.A.L. (1994). Why factor analysis is often the incorrect model for analyzing bipolar concepts, and what model can be used instead. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 97-110.