The influence of communication processes on group outcomes: Antithesis and thesis

Human Communication Research

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 249-271

  Hewes, Dean E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62749207091     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01347.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Anderson, J 1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22.
2. Anderson, J. E 1995). An introduction to neural networks. Cambridge: MIT.
3. Arrow, H., McGrath, J. Berdahl, J 2000). Small groups as complex systems. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
4. Bak, P 1996). How nature works. New York : Springer-Verlag.
5. Bales, R. F 1950). Interaction process analysis. Reading : Addison-Wesley.
6. Bales, R. F. Strodbeck, F 1951). Phases in group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485 495.
7. Bechtel, W. Abrhamsen, A 1991). Connectionism and mind. Cambridge : Basil Blackwell.
8. Bonito, J 2007). A local model of information sharing in small groups. Communication Theory, 17, 252 280.
9. Boster, F. Cruz, M 2002). Persuading in the small group context. In J. Dillard M. Pfau (Eds The persuasion handbook pp. 477 494). Thousand Oaks : Sage.
10. Bouchard, T 1972). Training, motivation, and personality as determinants of the effectiveness of brainstorming groups and individuals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 324 331.
11. Burnstein, E. Vinokur, A 1973). Testing two classes of theories about group induced shift in individual choices. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 123 137.
12. Burnstein, E. Vinokur, A 1977). Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 315 332.
13. Camacho, L. Paulus, P 1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071 1080.
14. Contractor, N. Seibold, D 1993). Theoretical frameworks for the study of structuring processes in group decision-support systems: Adaptive structuration theory and self-organizing systems theory. Human Communication Research, 19, 528 563.
15. Corman, S. Kuhn, T 2005). The dectability of socio-egocentric group speech: A quasi-Turing test. Communication Monographs, 72, 117 143.
16. Davis, J., Hubert, L. Au, W. T 1996). Procedural influence on group decision-making: The case of straw polls - Observation and simulation. In R. Hirokawa M. S. Poole (Eds Communication and group decision-making (2nd ed., pp. 384 425).
17. Diehl, M. Strobe, W 1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming: Toward a solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 479 509.
18. Diehl, M. Strobe, W 1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tacking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392 403.
19. Dugosh, K., Paulus, P., Roland, E. Yang, H 2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722 735.
20. Epstein, J 2006). Generative social science. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
21. Eve, R., Horsfall, S. Lee, M Eds 1997). Chaos, complexity, and sociology. Thousand Oaks : Sage.
22. Fisher, A. Hawes, L 1971). An interact system model: Generating a grounded theory of small groups. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57, 444 452.
23. Gouran, D 1999). Communication in groups: The emergence and evolutions of a field of study. In L. Frey, D. Gouran M. S. Poole (Eds The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 3 36). Thousand Oaks : Sage.
24. Hare, A. P., Blumberg, H., Davies, M. Kent, M. V 1994). Small group research: A handbook. Norwood: Ablex.
25. Harkins, S. Petty, R 1982). Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1214 1229.
26. Hewes, D 1979, November). Discourse can't "behave": Structure, structure, where is the structure. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Seminar on Interactive Discourse, San Antonio, TX.
27. Hewes, D 1980). Stochastic modeling of communication systems. In P. Monge J. Cappella (Eds Multivariate techniques in communication research. New York : Academic Press.
28. Hewes, D 1986). A socio-egocentric model of group decision-making. In R. Hirokawa M. S. Poole (Eds Communication and decision-making (1st ed., pp. 265 291). Thousand Oaks : Sage.
29. Hewes, D 1990, November). Challenging interaction influence on group decision-making. Paper presented to the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
30. Hewes, D 1996). Small group communication may not influence group decision-making: An amplification of the socio-egocentric model. In R. Hirokawa M. S. Poole (Eds Communication and decision-making (2nd ed., pp. 179 214). Thousand Oaks : Sage.
31. Hewes, D., Planalp, S. Steibel, M 1980). Analyzing social interaction: Some excruciating models and exhilarating results. In D. I. Nimmo (Ed Communication yearbook 4 (pp. 123 142). New Brunswick, NJ : Transaction-I.C.A.
32. Hoffman, C 1979). The group problem solving process. New York : Praeger.
33. Holland, J 1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Reading, MA : Addison Wesley.
34. Holland, J 1998). Emergence: From chaos to order. Reading, MA : Addison Wesley.
35. Honeycutt, J. Poole, M. S 1994, November). Procedural schemata for group decision-making. Presented at the National Speech Communication Conference, New Orleans.
36. Honeycutt, J., Wellman, L. Larson, M 1997). Beneath family role portrayals: An additional measure of communication influence using time-series analyses of turn at talk on a popular television program. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 40 58.
37. Jarboe, S 1999). Group communication and creativity processes. In L. Frey, D. Gouran M. S. Poole (Eds The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 335 368). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
38. Le Bon, G 2002). The crowd. Mineola : Dover.
39. McClelland, J., Rumelhart, D. Hilton, G 1988). The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In J. McClelland, D. Rumelhart the PDP Research Group (Eds Parallel distributed processing vol. 1, pp. 3 44).
40. McDougall, W 1920). The group mind. New York : Putnam & Sons.
41. McGrath, J 1997). Small groups research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 1, 7 27.
42. McLeod, P., Plunkett, K. Rolls, E 1998). Introduction to connectionist modeling of cognitive processes. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
43. McPhee, R., Poole, M. S. Seibold, D 1981). The valence model unveiled: A critique and alternative formulation. In M. Burgoon (Ed Communication yearbook 5 (pp. 259 278). New Brunswick: Transaction.
44. Meyers, R 1989a). Persuasive argument theory: A test of assumptions. Human Communication Research, 15, 357 381.
45. Meyers, R 1989b). Testing persuasive argument theory's prediction model: Alternative interactional accounts of group argument and influence. Communication Monographs, 56, 112 132.
46. Meyers, R. Brashers, D 1999). Influence processes in group interaction. In L. Frey, D. Gouran M. S. Poole (Eds The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 288 312). Thousand Oaks : Sage.
47. Olson, A 1957). Applied imagination. New York : Scribner's.
48. Paulus, P. Dzindolet, M. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575 586.
49. Pavitt, C 2003a). Do interacting groups perform better than aggregates of individuals: Why we have to be reductionists about group memory. Human Communication Research, 29, 592 500.
50. Pavitt, C 2003b). Why we still have to be reductionists about group memory. Human Communication Research, 29, 624 629.
51. Pavitt, C. Johnson, K 1999). An examination of the coherence of group discussions. Communication Research, 26, 303 321.
52. Poole, M. S. Doelger, J 1986). Developmental processes in group decision-making. In R. Hirokawa M. S. Poole (Eds Communication and decision-making (1st ed., pp. 35 61). Thousand Oaks : Sage.
53. Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. McPhee, R 1982). A comparison of normative and interactional explanations of group decision-making: Social decision schemes versus valence distributions. Communication Monographs, 49, 1 19.
54. Salazar, A 2002). Self-organizing and complexity perspectives of group creativity: Implications for group communication. In L. Frey (Ed New directions in group communication (pp. 179 199).
55. Sawyer, B. K 2005). Social emergence. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
56. Schramm, W 1954). The process and effects of mass communication. Urbana-Champaign : University of Illinois Press.
57. Seibold, D., Meyers, R. Sunwolf (1996). Communication and influence in group decision making. In R. Hirokawa M. S. Poole (Eds Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 242 268).
58. Shepperd, J. A 1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 67 81.
59. Vinokur, A. Burnstein, E 1978). Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 335 348.
60. Waldrop, M 1992). Complexity. New York : Simon & Schuster.