Why we still have to be reductionists about group memory

Human Communication Research

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 624-629

  Pavitt, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345014869     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/hcr/29.4.624     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Clark, S. E., Hori, A., Putnam, A., & Martin, T. P. (2000). Group collaboration in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1578-1588.
2. Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125.
3. Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 705-718.
4. Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 423-442.
5. Hollingshead, A. B., & Brandon, D. P. (2003). Potential benefits of communication in transactive memory systems. Human Communication Research, 29, 607-615.
6. Johnannson, O., Andersson, J., & Roennberg, J. (2000). Do elderly couples have a better prospective memory than other elderly people when they collaborate? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 121-133.
7. Lorge, I., & Solomon, H. (1955). Two models of group behavior in the solution of eureka-type problems. Psychometrika, 20, 139-148.
8. Pavitt, C. (2000). Answering questions requesting scientific explanations for communication. Communication Theory, 10, 379-404.
9. Pavitt, C., & Curtis, E. (1999). Small group discussion: A theoretical approach (3rd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.udel.edu/ communication/COMM356/pavitt.
10. Propp, K. M. (2003). In search of the assembly bonus effect: Continued exploration of communication's role in group memory. Human Communication Research, 29, 600-606.
11. Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., & Abakoumkin, G. (1996). Social compensation and the Kohler effect: Toward a theoretical explanation of motivation gains in group productivity. In E. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior, Vol. 2: Small group processes and individual relations (pp. 37-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448-467.
13. Vollrath, D. A., Sheppard, B. H., Hinsz, V. B., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Memory performance by decision-making groups and individuals. Organizational Performance and Human Decision Processes, 43, 289-300.
14. Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923-929.
15. Wittenbaum, G. M. (2003). Putting communication into the study of group memory. Human Communication Research, 29, 616-623.