More thoughts on the relationship between apparent and material densities in bone

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 794-795

  Zioupos, Peter ^a   Cook, Richard B ^b   Hutchinson, John R ^c  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^c ROYAL VETERINARY COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; CANCELLOUS BONE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORTICAL BONE; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BONE AND BONES; BONE DENSITY; HUMANS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 62749164538     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.01.014     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Hernandez C.J., Beaupre G.S., Keller T.S., and Carter D.R. The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus. Bone 29 (2001) 74-78
2. Keller T.S. Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. J. Biomech. 27 (1994) 1159-1168
3. Schileo E., Dall'ara E., Taddei F., Malandrino A., Schotkamp T., Baleani M., and Viceconti M. An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. J. Biomech. 41 (2008) 2483-2491
4. Schileo E., Taddei F., and Baleani M. Letter to the editor. J. Biomech. 42 (2009)
5. Zioupos P., Cook R.B., and Hutchinson J.R. Some basic relationships between density values in cancellous and cortical bone. J. Biomech. 41 (2008) 1961-1968