Some basic relationships between density values in cancellous and cortical bone

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 41, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1961-1968

  Zioupos, Peter ^a   Cook, Richard B ^b   Hutchinson, John R ^c  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^c ROYAL VETERINARY COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone; BV TV; Cancellous; Cortical; Density; Mineral content; Porosity

Indexed keywords

DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; POROSITY;

BONE TISSUE; CANCELLOUS; CORTICAL; MINERAL CONTENT;

BONE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; CANCELLOUS BONE; CORTICAL BONE; NONHUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; TRABECULAR BONE;

ANIMALS; BONE DENSITY; ELEPHANTS; FEMUR; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 44649197070     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.025     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ashman R.B., and Rho J.-Y. Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. Journal of Biomechanics 21 (1988) 177-181
2. Aspden R.M., and Li B. Reproducibility using Archimedes' principle in measuring cancellous bone volume by L. Zou, R.D. Bloebaum and K.N. Bachus. Medical Engineering and Physics 20 (1998) 159-160
3. Bonucci E. Mechanical testing of the bone and the bone-implant interface. In: An Y.H., and Draughn R.A. (Eds). Basic Composition and Structure of Bone (2000), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 3-22
4. Carter D.R., and Hayes W.C. The compressive behaviour of bone as a two phase porous structure. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 59-A (1977) 954-962
5. Coats A.M., Zioupos P., and Aspden R.M. Material properties of subchondral bone from patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis by microindentation testing and electron probe microanalysis. Calcified Tissue International 73 (2003) 66-71
6. Cook, R.B., 2005. Non-invasively assessed skeletal bone status and its relationship to the biomechanical properties and condition of cancellous bone. PhD Thesis, Cranfield University, UK.
7. Galante J., Rostoker W., and Ray R.D. Physical properties of trabecular bone. Calcified Tissue Research 5 (1970) 236-246
8. Gibson L.J. The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. Journal of Biomechanics 18 (1985) 317-328
9. Gibson L.J. Biomechanics of cellular solids. Journal of Biomechanics 38 (2005) 377-399
10. Gibson L.J., and Ashby M.F. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties (1997), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
11. Hutchinson, J.R., Miller, C.E., Fritsch, G., Hildebrandt, T., 2008. The anatomical foundation for multidisciplinary studies of animal limb function: examples from dinosaur and elephant limb imaging studies. In: Frey R., Endo, H. (Eds.), Digital Imaging and the Transformation of the Anatomical Sciences: Towards a New Morphology. Springer, Berlin (in press).
12. Keenan M.J., Hegsted M., Jones K.L., Delany J.P., Kime J.C., Melancon L.E., Tulley R.T., and Hong K.D. Comparison of bone density measurement techniques: DXA and Archimedes' principle. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 12 (1997) 1903-1907
13. Nicholson P.H.F., Cheng X.G., Lowet. G., Boonen S., Davie M.W.J., Dequeker J., and Van der Perre G. Structural and material properties of human vertebral cancellous bone. Medical Engineering and Physics 19 (1997) 729-737
14. Martens M., Van Audekercke R., Delport P., De Meester P., and Mulier J.C. The mechanical characteristics of cancellous bone at the upper femoral region. Journal of Biomechanics 16 (1983) 971-983
15. McNamara L.M., Prendergast P.J., and Schaffler M.B. Bone tissue material properties are altered during osteoporosis. Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions 5 (2005) 342-343
16. Mitton D., Rumerhart C., Hans D., and Meunier P.J. The effects of density and test conditions on measured compression and shear strength of cancellous bone from the lumbar vertebrae of ewes. Medical Engineering and Physics 19 (1997) 464-474
17. Rice J.C., Cowin S.C., and Bowman J.A. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. Journal of Biomechanics 21 (1988) 155-168
18. Schaffler M.B., and Burr D.B. Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density. Journal of Biomechanics 21 (1988) 13-16
19. Schileo E., Taddei F., Malandrino A., Cristofolini L., and Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. Journal of Biomechanics 40 (2007) 2982-2989
20. Sharp D.J., Tanner K.E., and Bonfield W. Measurement of the density of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics 23 (1990) 853-857
21. Wolf J. Das Gesetz der Transfomation der Knochen (1892), Hirchwald, Berlin
22. Zioupos, P., Aspden, R.M., 2000. Density, material quality and quantity issues in OP cancellous bone. In: Proceedings of the European Society of Biomechanics, Dublin, Ireland, p. 327.
23. Zioupos P., Cook R., Aspden R.M., and Coats A.M. Bone quality issues and matrix properties in OP cancellous bone. In: Hammer J., Nerlich M., and Dendorfer S. (Eds). Medicine meets Engineering (2008), IOS Press, The Netherlands 238-245