Optimum method selection for resolution enhancement of hyperspectral imagery

Information Technology Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 263-274

  Mianji, F A ^a   Zhang, Y ^a   Babakhani, A ^b  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b National Regulatory Authority Organization   (Iran)

Author keywords

Hyperspectral imagery; Learning based method; Resolution enhancement; Spectral mixture analysis

Indexed keywords

GENERIC APPROACHES; HIGH QUALITIES; HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGES; HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY; LEARNING-BASED METHOD; MULTI SOURCES; MULTIPLE FACTORS; OPTIMUM METHODS; RESOLUTION ENHANCEMENT; SPECTRAL MIXTURE ANALYSIS; SUPER-RESOLUTION ALGORITHMS; TRAINING DATUM;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; MIXTURES; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 62749158379     PISSN: 18125638     EISSN: 18125646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/itj.2009.263.274     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adams, J.B., M.O. Smith and P.E. Johnson, 1986. Spectral mixture modeling: A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 site. J. Geophys. Res., 91: 8098-8112.
2. Akgun, T., Y. Altunbasak and R.M. Mersereau, 2005. Super-resolution reconstruction of hyperspectral images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 14: 1860-1875.
3. Alvarez, L.D., J. Mateos, R. Molina and A.K. Katsaggelos, 2004. High-resolution images from compressed lowresolution video: Motion estimation and observable pixels. Int. J. Image. Syst. Technol., 14: 58-66.
4. Atkinson, P.M., M.E.J. Cutler and H. Lewis, 1997. Mapping sub-pixel proportional land cover with AVHRR imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens., 18: 917-935.
5. Bachmann, C. M., T.L. Ainsworth and R.A. Fusina, 2005. Exploiting manifold geometry in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 43:441-454.
6. Baker, S. and T. Kanade, 2002. Limits on super-resolution and how to break them. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell, 24: 1167-1183.
7. Boardman, J.W., 1989. Inversion of imaging spectrometry data using singular value decomposition. Proceeding of the IEEE Symposium of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, July 10-14, International Academic Press, pp: 2069-2072.
8. Broadwater, J. and R. Chellappa, 2007. Hybrid detectors for subpixel targets. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 29: 1891-1903.
9. Brown, M., S.R. Gunn and H.G. Lewis, 1999. Support vector machines for optimal classification and spectral unmixing. Ecol. Model., 120: 167-179.
10. Buttingsrud, B. and B.K. Alsberg, 2006. Super-resolution of hyperspectral images. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst, 84: 62-68.
11. Capel, D. and A. Zisserman, 2001. Super-resolution from multiple views using learnt image models. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Dec. 8-14, IEEE Computer Society, pp: 627-634.
12. Chalidabhongse, J. and C.C.J. Kuo, 1997. Fast motion vector estimation using multiresolution-spatiotemporal correlation. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. VideoTechnol., 7: 477-488.
13. Chang, C. and CD. Heinz, 2000. Constrained subpixel target detection for remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 38: 1144-1159.
14. Chang, C, S.S. Chiang, J.A. Smith and I.W. Ginsberg, 2002. Linear spectral random mixture analysis for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 40: 375-392.
15. Chang, C. and B. Ji, 2006. Weighted abundanceconstrained linear spectral mixture analysis. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44: 378-388.
16. Choi, E.C., J.S. Choi and M.G. Kang, 2004. Superresolution approach to overcome physical limitations of imaging sensors. An overview. Int. J. Image. Syst. Technol., 14: 36-46.
17. Choi, M.J., R.Y. Kim, M.R. Nam and H.O. Kim, 2005. Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic satellite images using the curvelet transform. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett, 2: 136-140.
18. Eismann, M.T. and R.C. Hardie, 2004. Application of the stochastic mixing model to hyperspectral resolution enhancement. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 42: 1924-1933.
19. Eismann, M.T. and R.C. Hardie, 2005. Hyperspectral resolution enhancement using high-resolution multispectral imagery with arbitrary response functions. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 43: 455-465.
20. Farsiu, S., D. Robinson, M. Elad and P. Milanfar, 2004. Advances and challenges in super-resolution. Int. J. Image. Syst. Technol, 14: 47-57.
21. Foody, G.M., 1998. Sharpening fuzzy classification output to refine the representation of sub-pixel land cover distribution Int. J. Remote Sens., 19: 2593-2599.
22. Freeman, W.T., T.R. lones and E.C. Pasztor, 2002. Example-based super-resolution IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., 22: 56-65.
23. Garcia-Haro, F.J., M.A. Gilabert and J. Melia, 1996. Linear spectral mixture modeling to estimate vegetation amount from optical spectral data. Int. J. Remote Sens., 17: 3373-3400.
24. Goetz, A.F.H. and J.W. Boardman, 1989. Quantitative determination of imaging spectrometer specifications based on spectral mixing models. Proceedings of the Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, International of 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, Jul. 10-14, IEEE Xplore London, pp: 1036-1039.
25. Gonzalez, R.F. and R.E. Woods, 2003. Digital Image Processing. 2ndEdn., Printice Hall, Beijing.
26. Goodrn, D.G., J. Gao and G.M. Henebry, 2004. The effect of solar illumination angle and sensor view angle on observed patterns of spatial structure in tallgrass prairie. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 42: 154-165.
27. Gross, H.N. and J.R. Schott, 1998. Application of spectral mixture analysis and image fusion techniques for image sharpening. Remote Sens. Environ., 63: 85-94.
28. Gu, Y., Y. Zhang and J. Zhang, 2008. Integration of spatial-spectral information for resolution enhancement in hyperspectral images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 46: 1347-1358.
29. Gualtieri, J.A. and S. Chettii, 2000. Support vector machines for classification of hyperspectral data. Proceeding of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Jul. 24-28, IEEE Xplore London, pp: 813-815.
30. Guo, B.F., S. Gunn, B. Damper and J. Nelson, 2005. Hyperspectral image fusion using spectrally weighted kernels. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Fusion, Jul. 25-28, Philadelphia, PA., pp: 402-408.
31. Hardie, R.C. and M.T. Eismann, 2004. MAP estimation for hyperspectral image resolution enhancement using an auxiliary sensor. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 13: 1174-1184.
32. Healey, G. andD. Slater, 1999. Models and methods for automated material identification in hyperspectral imagery acquired under unknown illumination and atmospheric conditions. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 37: 2706-2717.
33. Heinz, D. and C.I. Chang, 2001. Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 39: 529-545.
34. Jia, S. and Y. Qian, 2007. Spectral and spatial complexitybased hyperspectral unmixing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 45: 3867-3879.
35. Joshi, M.V., L. Bruzzone and S. Chaudhuri, 2006. A modelbased approach to multiresolution fusion in remotely sensed images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44: 2549-2562.
36. Li, R., B. Zeng and M.L. Liou, 1994. A new three-step search algorithm for block motion estimation. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol, 4: 438-442.
37. Lu, Y., M. Inamura and M. Del Carmen-Valdes, 2004. Super-resolution of the undersampled and subpixel shifted image sequence by a neural network. Int. J. Image. Syst. Technol, 14: 8-15.
38. Manolakis, D., G. Shaw and N. Keshava, 2000. Comparative analysis of hyperspectral adaptive matched filter detectors. Proceeding of the SPIE, Algorithms for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery VI, Apr. 24-26, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham, WA, USA, pp: 2-17.
39. Manolakis, D. and G. Shaw, 2002. Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications. IEEE Signal Process. Mag a., 19: 29-43.
40. Manolakis, D., D. Marden and G.A. Shaw, 2003. Hyperspectral image processing for automatic target detection applications. Lincoln Lab. J., 14: 79-116.
41. Marziliano, P. and M. Vetterli, 2000. Reconstruction of irregularly sampled discrete-time bandlimited signals with unknown sampling locations. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc, 48:3462-3471.
42. Meria, M.T. and J. Nunez, 2007. Super-resolution of remotely sensed images with variable-pixel linear reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 45: 1446-1457.
43. Mertens, K.C., L.P.C. Verbeke, T. Westra and R.R. de Wulf, 2004. Sub-pixel mapping and sub-pixel sharpening using neural network predicted wavelet coefficients. Remote Sens. Environ, 91: 225-236.
44. Mianji, F.A, Y. Zhang, H.S. Sulehria, A. Babakhani and M.R. Kardan, 2008a. Superresolution challenges in hyperspectral imagery. Inform. Technol. J., 7: 1030-1036.
45. Mianji, F.A., Y. Zhang andM. Hosseinipanah, 2008b. A Classification enhancement in hyperspectral imagery using super-resolution techniques. Proceeding of the 9th International Conference on Signal Processing, Oct. 26-29, IEEE Computer Society, pp: 998-1001.
46. Munechika, C.K., J.S. Warnick, C. Salvaggio and J.R. Schott, 1993. Resolution enhancement of multispectral image data to improve classification accuracy. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens., 59: 67-72.
47. Nguyen, M.Q., P.M. Atkinson H.G. Lewis, 2006. Superresolution mapping using a Hopfield neural network with fused images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44: 736-749.
48. Nishii, R., S. Kusanobu and S. Tanaka, 1996. Enhancement of low spatial resolution image based on high resolution bands. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 34: 1151-1158.
49. Novak, L.M., G.J. Owirka and A.L. Weaver, 1999. Automatic target recognition using enhanced resolution SAR data. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Elect. Syst, 35: 157-175.
50. Perm, B.S., 2002. Using simulated annealing to obtain optimal linear end-member mixtures of hyperspectral data. Comput. Geosci., 28: 809-817.
51. Plaza, A., P. Martinez, R. Perez and J. Plaza, 2002. Spatialspectral endmember extraction by multidimensional morphological operations. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 40: 2025-2041.
52. Plaza, A., P. Martinez, R. Perez and J. Plaza, 2004. A quantitative and comparative analysis of endmember extraction algorithms from hyperspectral data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 42: 650-663.
53. Price, J.C., 1987. Combining panchromatic and multispectral imagery dual resolution satellite instruments. Remote Sens. Environ., 21: 119-128.
54. Qian, D., 2004. Optimal linear unmixing for hyperspectral image analysis. Proceedings of the Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Sept. 20-24, IEEE Computer Society, pp: 3219-3221.
55. Rhody, H.E., 2002. Enhancing spatial resolution for exploitation in hyperspectral imagery. Proceedings of the 31st Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop, Oct. 16-18, IEEE Xplore London, pp: 19-28.
56. Robinson, G., H.N. Gross and J.R. Schott, 2000. Evaluation of two applications of spectral mixing models to image fusion. Remote Sens. Environ., 71: 272-281.
57. Robinson, D. and P. Milanfar, 2006. Statistical performance analysis of super-resolution. IEEE Trans. Image Proc, 15: 1413-1428.
58. Sandmeier, S.R., E.M. Middleton, DW. Deering and W. Qin, 1999. The potential of hyperspectral bidirectional reflectance distribution function data for grass canopy characterization. J. Geophys. Res., 104: 9547-9560.
59. Schowengerdt, R.A., 1997. Remote Sensing: Models and Methods for Image Processing. 2nd Edn, CA Academic, San Diego, ISBN: 0126289816.
60. Stem, D.W.J., S.G. Beaven, L.E. Hoff, E.M. Winter, A.P. Schaum and A.D. Stocker, 2002. Anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Signal Proc. Maga., 19: 58-69.
61. Tanaka, M. and M. Okutomi, 2007. A fast algorithm for reconstruction-based superresolution and evaluation of its accuracy. Syst. Comput. Jap., 38: 44-52.
62. Tatem, A. J., H.G. Lewis, P.M. Atkinson and M.S. Nixon, 2001. Super-resolution target identification from remotely sensed images using a Hopfield neural network. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 39:781-796.
63. Vandewalle, P., L. Sbaiz, J. Vandewalle and M. Vetterli, 2004.How to take advantage of aliasing in bandlimited signals. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, May 17-21, IEEE Xplore London, pp: 948-951.
64. Vandewalle, P., L. Sbaiz, M. Vetterli and S. Susstrunk, 2005.Supper-resolution from highly undersampled images. Proceedings of the IEEE International conference on Image Processing, Sept. 11-14, IEEE Computer Society, pp: 889-892.
65. Wang, J. and C.I. Chang, 2006. Applications of independent component analysis in endmember extraction and abundance quantification for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44: 2601-2616.
66. Winter, M.E. and E.M. Winter, 2002a. Physics-based resolution enhancement of hyperspectral data. Proc. SPIE., 4725: 580-587.
67. Winter, M.E. and E.M. Winter, 2002b. Resolution enhancement of hyperspectral data. Proceeding of the Aerospace Conference, Mar. 9-16, IEEE Xplore London, pp: 1523-1529.
68. Zhanga, D., H. Lib and M. Du, 2005. Fast MAP-based multiframe super-resolution image reconstruction. Image Vision Comput., 23: 671-679.