Reporting of participant compliance in randomized controlled trials of nutrition supplements during pregnancy

Maternal and Child Nutrition

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 97-103

  Kehoe, Sarah H ^a,c   Chheda, Purvi S ^b   Sahariah, Sirazul A ^b   Baird, Janis ^a   Fall, Caroline H D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b Centre for the Study of Social Change   (India)

^c SOUTHAMPTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Compliance; CONSORT; Maternal nutrition; Pregnancy; Randomized controlled trial; Supplement; Trial reporting

Indexed keywords

TRACE ELEMENT;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CINAHL; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; EMBASE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; HUMAN; MATERNAL NUTRITION; MEDLINE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SELF REPORT; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MATERNAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 62749143522     PISSN: 17408695     EISSN: 17408709     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2008.00178.x     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Altman D.G., Schulz K.F., Moher D., Egger M., Davidoff F. & Elbourne D. for the CONSORT Group (2001). The revised consort statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 134, 663-694.
2. Campbell M., Fitzpatrick R., Haines A., Kinmouth A.L., Sandercock P. & Spiegelhalter D. (2000) Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 32, 694-696.
3. Cox S.E., Staalsoe T., Arthur P., Bulmers J.N., Tagbor H. & Hviid L. (2005) Maternal vitamin A supplementation and immunity to malaria in pregnancy in Ghanaian primigravids. Tropical Medicine and International Health 10, 1286-1297.
4. Devereaux P.J., Manns B.J., Ghali W.A., Quan H. & Guyatt G.H. (2002) The reporting of methodological factors in randomised controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist. Controlled Clinical Trials 23, 380-388.
5. Dzewaltowski D.A., Estabrooks P.A., Klesges L.M., Bull S. & Glasgow R.E. (2004) Behaviour change intervention research in community settings: How generalizable are the results? Health Promotion International 19, 235-243.
6. Egger M., Juni P. & Bartlett C. (2001) Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. The Journal of The American Medical Association 285, 1996-1999.
7. Gartlehner G., Hansen R.A., Nissman D., Lohr K.N. & Carey T.S. (April, 2006) Criteria for Distinguishing Effectiveness From Efficacy Trials in Systematic Reviews. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Rockville, MD.
8. Jones C. (2002) How to appraise a clinical paper critically. Pharmaceutical Journal 268, 875-877.
9. Moher D. (2007) Reporting research results: A moral obligation for all researchers. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 54, 331-335.
10. Moher D., Schulz K.F. & Altman D. (2001a) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. The Journal of The American Medical Association 285, 1987-1991.
11. Moher D., Jones A. & Lepage L. (2001b) Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials. A comparative before -and -after evaluation. The Journal of The American Medical Association 285, 1992-1995.
12. Paulhus D.L. (1991) Measurement and control of response bias. In: Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (eds J.P. Robinson & P.R. Shaver), pp. 17-59. Academic Press: San Diego, CA.