Reporting research results: A moral obligation for all researchers;Présenter les résultats de recherche: Une obligation morale pour tous les chercheurs

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 331-335

  Moher, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKYLATING AGENT; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; PAROXETINE; SEROTONIN UPTAKE INHIBITOR;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; CANCER THERAPY; CHILD PSYCHIATRY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEPRESSION; DISEASE SEVERITY; DRUG INFORMATION; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SUICIDE ATTEMPT;

EID: 34250221185     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03022653     Document Type: Editorial

References (19)

1. Rennie D. CONSORT revised - improving the reporting of randomized trials. JAMA 2001; 285: 2006-7.
2. Enron. Available from URL; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron (accessed, 31st January 2007).
3. Sterlin TD, Rosenbaum WL, Weinkam JJ. Publication decisions revisited: the effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to publish and vice versa. Am Stat 1995; 49: 108-12.
4. Hall R, de Antueno C, Webber A. Publication bias in the medical literature: a review by a Canadian Research Ethics Board. Can J Anesth 2007; 54: 380-8.
5. Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1994; 272: 158-62.
6. Dickersin K. Publication bias: recognizing the problem, understanding its origins and scope, and preventing harm. In: Rothstein H, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M (Eds). Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis - Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons; 2005: 11-33.
7. Mahoney MJ. Publication prejudices: an experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognit Ther Res 1977; 1: 161-75.
8. Stern JM, Simes RJ. Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. BMJ 1997; 315: 640-5.
9. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ 2003; 326: 1167-70.
10. Simes RJ. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 1529-41.
11. Chan AW, Krleza-Jeric K, Schmid I, Altman DG. Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CMAJ 2004; 171: 735-40.
12. Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004; 291: 2457-65.
13. Pildal J, Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Forfang E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study. BMJ 2005; 330: 1049.
14. Easterbrook PJ. Directory of registries of clinical trials. Stat Med 1992; 11: 345-59.
15. Whittington CJ, Kendall T, Fonagy P, Cottrell D, Cotgrove A, Boddington E. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data. Lancet 2004; 363: 1341-5.
16. New York State. Press releases. Available from URL; http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2004/aug/aug26a_04.html (accessed, January 31st 2007).
17. Deangelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al.; International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Is this clinical trial fully registered? A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 2005; 293: 2927-9.
18. World Health Organization. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Available from URL; http://www.who.int/ictrp/en/ (accessed 31st January 2007).
19. Drazen JM, Zarin DA. Salvation by registration. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 184-5.