A VEP measure of the binocular fusion of horizontal and vertical disparities

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1786-1790

  Hale, Julia ^a   Harrad, Richard A ^a   McKee, Suzanne P ^b   Pettet, Mark W ^b   Norcia, Anthony M ^b  

^a BRISTOL EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b SMITH KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD; DEPTH PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA;

ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINA; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 20444450485     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0954     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. McKee SP, Levi DM, Bowne SF. The imprecision of stereopsis. Vision Res. 1990;30:1763-1779.
2. Blake R, Boothroyd K. The precedence of binocular fusion over binocular rivalry. Percept Psychophys. 1985;37:114-124.
3. Tyler CW. Stereoscopic depth movement: two eyes less sensitive than one. Science. 1971;174:958-961.
4. Tyler CW, Foley JM. Stereomovement suppression for transient disparity changes. Perception. 1974;3:287-296.
5. Schor CM, Wood IC, Ogawa J. Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis. Vision Res. 1984;24:573-578.
6. Sumnall JH, Harris JM. Minimum displacement thresholds for binocular three-dimensional motion. Vision Res. 2002;42:715-724.
7. McKee SP, Harrad RA. Fusional suppression in normal and stereoanomalous observers. Vision Res. 1993;33:1645-1658.
8. Norcia AM, McKee SP, Bonneh Y, Pettet MW. Suppression of monocular visual direction under fused binocular stimulation: evoked potential measurements. J Vision. 2005;5:34-44.
9. McKee SP, Levi DM. Dichoptic hyperacuity: the precision of nonius alignment. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987;4:1104-1108.
10. Tang Y, Norcia AM. An adaptive filter for steady-state evoked responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;96:268-277.
11. Victor JD, Mast J. A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;78:378-388.
12. Norcia AM, Wesemann W, Manny RE. Electrophysiological correlates of vernier and relative motion mechanisms in human visual cortex. Vis Neurosci. 1999;16:1123-1131.
13. Victor JD, Conte MM. Two-frequency analysis of interactions elicited by Vernier stimuli. Vis Neurosci. 2000;17:959-973.
14. Zemon V, Ratliff F. Visual evoked potentials: evidence for lateral interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:5723-5726.
15. Steinman SB, Levi DM, Klein SA, Manny RE. Selectivity of the evoked potential for vernier offset. Vision Res. 1985;25:951-961.