Suppression of monocular visual direction under fused binocular stimulation: Evoked potential measurements

Journal of Vision

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 34-44

  Norcia, Anthony M ^a   McKee, Suzanne P ^a   Bonneh, Yoram ^b   Pettet, Mark W ^a  

^a SMITH KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Binocular interaction; Fusion; Stereopsis; Visual evoked potentials

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTIONAL VISION; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; OSCILLATION; RECOGNITION; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; SURFACE PROPERTY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FLICKER FUSION; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 16344365190     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/5.1.4     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Apkarian, P., Levi, D., & Tyler, C.W. (1981). Binocular facilitation in the visual-evoked potential of strabismic amblyopes. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 58(10), 820-830.
2. Bach, M., & Meigen, T. (1992). Electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation in the human visual evoked potential. Vision Research, 32(3), 417-424.
3. Bach, M., & Meigen, T. (1997). Similar electrophysiological correlates of texture segregation induced by luminance, orientation, motion and stereo. Vision Research, 37(11), 1409-1414.
4. Blair, R. C., & Karniski, W. (1993). An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. Psychophysiology, 30(5), 518-524.
5. Brown, R. J., Candy, T. R., & Norcia, A. M. (1999). Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 40(13), 3324-3333.
6. Brown, R. J., & Norcia, A. M. (1997). A method for investigating binocular rivalry in real-time with the steady-state VEP. Vision Research, 37(17), 2401-2408.
7. Cobb, W. A., Morton, H. B., & Ettlinger, G. (1967). Cerebral potentials evoked by pattern reversal and their suppression in visual rivalry. Nature, 216(120), 1123-1125.
8. de Labra, C., & Valle-Inclan, F. (2001). Electrical activity in primary visual area due to interocular suppression. Neuroreport, 12(18), 4099-4102.
9. Harris, J. M., McKee, S. P., & Watamaniuk, S. N. J. (1998). Visual search for motion-in-depth: Stereomotion does not 'pop out' from disparity noise. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 165-168.
10. Harris, J. M., & Sumnall, J. H. (2000). Detecting binocular 3D motion in static 3D noise: No effect of viewing distance. Spatial Vision, 14(1), 11-19.
11. Harter, M. R., Seiple, W. H., & Musso, M. (1974). Binocular summation and suppression: Visually evoked cortical responses to dichoptically presented patterns of different spatial frequencies. Vision Research, 14(11), 1169-1180.
12. Harter, M. R., Towle, V. L., & Musso, M. F. (1976). Size specificity and interocular suppression: Monocular evoked potentials and reaction times. Vision Research, 16(10), 1111-1117.
13. Harter, M. R., Towle, V. L., Zakrzewski, M., & Moyer, S. M. (1977). An objective indicant of binocular vision in humans: Size-specific interocular suppression of visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 43(6), 825-836.
14. Lamme, V. A., Van Dijk, B. W., & Spekreijse, H. (1992). Texture segregation is processed by primary visual cortex in man and monkey: Evidence from VEP experiments. Vision Research, 32(5), 797-807.
15. Lansing, R. W. (1964). Electroencephalographic correlates of binocular rivalry in man. Science, 146, 1325-1327.
16. Legge, G. E. (1984). Binocular contrast summation. I. Detection and discrimination. Vision Research, 24(4), 373-383.
17. Lehmann, D., & Fender, D. H. (1967). Monocularly evoked electroencephalogram potentials: influence of target structure presented to the other eye. Nature, 215(97), 204-205.
18. Lehmann, D., & Fender, D. H. (1968). Component analysis of human averaged evoked potentials: Dichoptic stimuli using different target structure. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 24(6), 542-553.
19. Lennerstrand, G. (1978a). Binocular interaction studied with visual evoked responses (VER) in humans with normal or impaired binocular vision. Acta Ophthalmology (Copenh), 56(4), 628-637.
20. Lennerstrand, G. (1978b). Some observations on visual evoked responses (VER) to dichoptic stimulation. Acta Ophthalmology (Copenh), 56(4), 638-647.
21. Levi, D. M., Manny, R. E., Klein, S. A., & Steinman, S. B. (1983). Electrophysiological correlates of hyperacuity in the human visual cortex. Nature, 306(5942), 468-470.
22. McKee, S. P., & Harrad, R. A. (1993). Fusional suppression in normal and stereoanomalous observers. Vision Research, 33(12), 1645-1658.
23. Norcia, A. M., Harrad, R. A., & Brown, R. J. (2000). Changes in cortical activity during suppression in stereoblindness. Neuroreport, 11(5), 1007-1012.
24. Norcia, A. M., Wesemann, W., & Manny, R. E. (1999). Electrophysiological correlates of vernier and relative motion mechanisms in human visual cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 16(6), 1123-1131.
25. Odom, J. V., & Harter, M. R. (1983). Interocular suppression in adults and infants using anaglyphic stimuli: Visually evoked potential measures. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 56(2), 232-243.
26. Ratliff, F., & Zemon, V. (1982). Some new methods for the analysis of lateral interactions that influence the visual evoked potential. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 388, 113-124.
27. Spekreijse, H., van der Tweel, L. H., & Regan, D. (1972). Interocular sustained suppression: Correlations with evoked potential amplitude and distribution. Vision Research, 12(3), 521-526.
28. Srinivasan, R., Russell, D. P., Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (1999). Increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(13), 5435-5448.
29. Sumnall, J. H., & Harris, J. M. (2002). Minimum displacement thresholds for binocular three-dimensional motion. Vision Research, 42(6), 715-724.
30. Tang, Y., & Norcia, A. M. (1995). An adaptive filter for steady-state evoked responses. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96(3), 268-277.
31. Tononi, G., Srinivasan, R., Russell, D. P., & Edelman, G. M. (1998). Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 95(6), 3198-3203.
32. Towle, V. L., Harter, M. R., & Previc, F. H. (1980). Binocular interaction of orientation and spatial frequency channels: evoked potentials and observer sensitivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 27(4), 351-360.
33. Tyler, C. W. (1971). Stereoscopic depth movement: Two eyes less sensitive than one. Science, 174(12), 958-961.
34. Tyler, C. W., & Apkarian, P. A. (1985). Effects of contrast, orientation and binocularity in the pattern evoked potential. Vision Research, 25(6), 755-766.
35. Tyler, C. W., & Cavanagh, P. (1991). Purely chromatic perception of motion in depth: Two eyes as sensitive as one. Perception & Psychophysics, 49(1), 53-61.
36. Valle-Inclan, F., Hackley, S. A., de Labra, C., & Alvarez, A. (1999). Early visual processing during binocular rivalry studied with visual evoked potentials. Neuroreport, 10(1), 21-25.
37. Victor, J. D., & Mast, J. (1991). A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78(5), 378-388.
38. von Tschermak-Seysenegg, A. (1952). Introduction to physiological optics. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
39. Vreven, D., McKee, S. P., & Verghese, P. (2002). Contour completion through depth interferes with stereoacuity. Vision Research, 42(18), 2153-2162.
40. Westheimer, G. (1990). Detection of disparity motion by the human observer. Optometry and Vision Science, 67, 627-630.
41. Zemon, V., & Ratliff, F. (1982). Visual evoked potentials: Evidence for lateral interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 79 (18), 5723-5726.
42. Zemon, V., & Ratliff, F. (1984). Intermodulation components of the visual evoked potential: responses to lateral and superimposed stimuli. Biological Cybernetics, 50(6), 401-408.