Spatial summation properties for magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1221-1226

  Battista, Josephine ^a   Badcock, David R ^b   McKendrick, Allison M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL SUMMATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; MIDDLE AGED; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL SYSTEM;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 62649121471     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2517     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(5):389-393.
2. Weber AJ, Harman CD. Structure-function relations of parasol cells in the normal and glaucomatous primate retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(9):3197-3207.
3. Weber AJ, Kaufman PL, Hubbard WC. Morphology of single ganglion cells in the glaucomatous primate retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39(12):2304-2320.
4. Ansari EA, Morgan JE, Snowden RJ. Psychophysical characterisation of early functional loss in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(10):1131-1135.
5. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR, Morgan WH. Psychophysical measurement of neural adaptation abnormalities in magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(6):1846-1853.
6. Quigley HA, Sanchez RM, Dunkelberger GR, L'Hernault NL, Baginski TA. Chronic glaucoma selectively damages large optic nerve fibers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28(6):913-920.
7. Crawford ML, Harwerth RS, Smith EL 3rd, Shen F, Carter-Dawson L. Glaucoma in primates: cytochrome oxidase reactivity in parvo-and magnocellular pathways. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41(7):1791-1802.
8. Yucel YH, Zhang Q, Gupta N, Kaufman PL, Weinreb RN. Loss of neurons in magnocellular and parvocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(3): 378-384.
9. Yucel YH, Zhang Q, Weinreb RN, Kaufman PL, Gupta N. Effects of retinal ganglion cell loss on magno-, parvo-, koniocellular pathways in the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22(4):465- 481.
10. Bartlett NR. Thresholds as dependent on some energy relations and characteristics of the subject. In: Graham CH, ed. Vision and Visual Perception. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1965:175-177.
11. Davila KD, Geisler WS. The relative contributions of pre-neural and neural factors to areal summation in the fovea. Vision Res. 1991; 31(7-8):1369-1380.
12. Smith VC, Sun VC, Pokorny J. Pulse and steady-pedestal contrast discrimination: effect of spatial parameters. Vision Res. 2001; 41(16):2079-2088.
13. Pokorny J, Smith VC. Psychophysical signatures associated with magnocellular and parvocellular pathway contrast gain. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997;14(9):2477-2486.
14. Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, et al. Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(1):24-30.
15. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR. Contrast-processing dysfunction in both magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in migraineurs with or without aura. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(1):442-448.
16. Sloan LL. Area and luminance of test object as variables in examination of the visual field by projection perimetry. Vision Res. 1961;1(1-2):121-138.
17. Wild JM, Wood JM, Flanagan JG. Spatial summation and the cortical magnification of perimetric profiles. Ophthalmologica. 1987; 195(2):88-96.
18. Wood JM, Wild JM, Drasdo N, Crews SJ. Perimetric profiles and cortical representation. Ophthalmic Res. 1986;18(5):301-308.
19. Dannheim F, Drance SM. Psychovisual disturbances in glaucoma: a study of temporal and spatial summation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974; 91(6):463-468.
20. Dannheim F, Drance SM. Studies of spatial summation of central retinal areas in normal people of all ages. Can J Ophthalmol. 1971;6(4):311-319.
21. Fellman RL, Lynn JR, Starita RJ, Swanson WH. Clinical importance of spatial summation in glaucoma. VIIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting; 1989; Kugler, Amsterdam.
22. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, Smith EL 3rd, Crawford ML. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(10): 2242-2250.
23. Lie I. Visual detection and resolution as a function of retinal locus. Vision Res. 1980;20(11):967-974.
24. Wilson ME. Invariant features of spatial summation with changing locus in the visual field. J Physiol. 1970;207(3):611-622.
25. Wild JM, Wood JM, Barnes DA. The cortical representation of gradient-adapted multiple-stimulus perimetry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1986;6(4):401-405.
26. Anderson RS. The psychophysics of glaucoma: improving the structure/function relationship. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2006;25(1): 79-97.