Age-related differences in reliance behavior attributable to costs within a human-decision aid system

Human Factors

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 853-863

  Ezer, Neta ^a   Fisk, Arthur D ^a   Rogers, Wendy A ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE-RELATED; COST STRUCTURES; DECISION AID SYSTEMS; DECISION AIDSS; DYNAMIC COSTS; EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATIONS; IF THERE ARES; OLDER ADULTS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

COSTS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS;

EID: 62649091288     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872008X375018     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Beck, H. P., Dzindolet, M. T., & Pierce, L. G. (2007). Automation usage decisions: Controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task. Human Factors, 49, 429-437.
2. Cohen, M. S., Parasuraman, R., & Freeman, J. T. (1998). Trust in decision aids: A model and its training implications. In Proceedings of the 1998 Command and Control of Research and Technology Symposium (pp. 1-37). Washington, DC: Department of Defense, C4ISSR Cooperative Research Program.
3. Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., et al. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21, 333-352.
4. Deaton, J. E., & Parasuraman, R. (1993). Sensory and cognitive vigilance: Effects of age on performance and subjective workload. Human Performance, 6, 71-97.
5. Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L. G., Beck, H. P., & Dawe, L. A. (2002). The perceived utility of human and automated aids in a visual detection task. Human Factors, 44, 79-94.
6. Ezer, N. (2006). Toward an understanding of optimal performance within a human-automation collaborative system: Effects of error and verification cost. Unpublished master's thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
7. Fisk, A. D., & Kirlik, A. (1996). Practical relevance and age-related research: Can theory advance without practice? In W. A. Rogers, A. D. Fisk, & N. Walker (Eds.), Aging and skilled performance: Advances in theory and application (pp. 1-15). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., & Sanchez, J. (2004). Reliability and age-related effects on trust and reliance of a decision support aid. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 586-589). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
9. Hammond, K. R., & Stewart, T. R. (Eds.). (2001). The essential Brunswick: Beginnings, explications, applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Hertzog, C., Vernon, M. C., & Rypma, B. (1993). Age differences in mental rotation task performance: The influence of speed/accuracy tradeoffs. Journals of Gerontology, 48, P150-P156.
11. Ho, G., Kiff, L. M., Plocher, T., & Haigh, K. Z. (2005). A model of trust and reliance of automation technology for older users. In Papers of the AAAI Fall Symposium "Caring Machines: AI in Eldercare" (pp. 45-50). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
12. Ho, G., Wheatley, D., & Scialfa, C. T. (2005). Age differences in trust and reliance of a medication management system. Interacting with Computers, 17, 690-710.
13. Kirlik, A. (1993). Modeling strategic behavior in human-automation interaction: Why an "aid" can (and should) go unused. Human Factors, 35, 221-241.
14. Kramer, R. M. (2001). Trust rules for trust dilemmas: How decision makers think and act in the shadow of doubt. In R. Falcone, M. Singh, & Y.-H. Tan (Eds.), Trust in cyber-societies: Integrating the human and artificial perspectives (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2246, pp. 9-26). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
15. Mayer, A. K., Sanchez, J., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2006). Don't let me down: The role of operator expectations in human-automation interaction. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 2345-2349). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
16. McCarley, J. S., Wiegmann, D. A., Wickens, C. D., & Kramer, A. F. (2003). Effects of age on utilization and perceived reliability of an automated decision-making aid for luggage screening. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 340-343). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
17. Myerson, J., Adams, D. R., & Hale, S. (2003). Analysis of group differences in processing speed: Brinley plots, Q-Q plots, and other conspiracies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 224-237.
18. Salthouse, T. A. (1979). Adult age and the speed-accuracy trade-off. Ergonomics, 22, 811-821.
19. Shipley, W. C. (1940). A self-administered scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. Journal of Psychology, 9, 271-377.
20. Sit, R. A., & Fisk, A. D. (1999). Age-related performance in a multiple-task environment. Human Factors, 41, 26-34.
21. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Memory Scale III (3rd ed). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
22. Wickens, C. D., & Dixon, S. R. (2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: A synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8, 201-212.