Trust rules for trust dilemmas: How decision makers think and act in the shadow of doubt

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2246, Issue , 2001, Pages 9-26

  Roderick, M Kramer ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING;

COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS; COOPERATIVE RELATIONSHIPS; DECISION MAKERS; DIFFERENT DECISION RULES; EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION; SIMULATION METHODOLOGY;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 84950267270     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Allison, S. & Messick, D., (1990), Social decision heuristics in the use of share resources, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 195-204, 1990.
2. Arriaga, X. B., & Rusbult, (1998), C. E., Standing in my partner's shoes: Partner perspective taking and reactions to accommodative dilemmas, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 927-948.
3. Axelrod, R., (1980a), Effective choice in the prisoner's dilemma, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 3-25.
4. Axelrod, R. (1980b), More effective choice in the prisoner's dilemma, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 379-403.
5. Axelrod, R. (1984), The evolution of cooperation, New York: Basic Books.
6. Axelrod, R. & Dion, D. (1988), The further evolution of cooperation, Science, 242. 1385-1390.
7. Baron, J. (1996), Do no harm, In D. M. Messick & A. E. Tenburnsel (Eds.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics, pp. 197-214. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8. Bazerman, M. (1986), Judgment in managerial decision making. New York: Wiley.
9. Bazerman, M. H. (1994), Judgment in managerial decision making. New York: John Wiley.
10. Bendor, J. (1987), In good times and bad: Reciprocity in an uncertain world, American Journal of Political Science, 31, 531-558.
11. Bendor, J., Kramer, R. M., & Stout, S. (1991), When in doubt: Cooperation in the noisy prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 691-719.
12. Bendor, J., Kramer, R. M., & Swistak, P. (1996), Cooperation under uncertainty (Comment on Kollock), American Sociological Review, 61, 333-338.
13. Cialdini, R. (1993), Influence: Science and Practice, New York: Harper-Collins.
14. Garthoff, R. (1989), Reflections on the Cuban Missle Crisis, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
15. Gigerenzer, G., & Too, P. M. (1999), Simple heuristics that make us smart, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
16. Jervis, R. (1976), Perception and misperception in international politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Kramer, R. M. (1996), Divergent realities and convergent disappointments in the hierarchic relation: The intuitive auditor at work, In R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
18. Kramer, R. M. (1998), Paranoid cognition in social systems, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 251-275.
19. Kramer, R. M. (2001), Trust and distrust as adaptive orientations in trust dilemmas, Unpublished manuscript.
20. Kramer, R. M. (1999), Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions, Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598.
21. Kramer, R., Meyerson, D. & Davis, G. (1990), How much is enough? Psychological components of 'guns versus butter' decisions in a security dilemma, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 984-993.
22. Kramer, R., Newton, E., & Pommerenke, P. (1993), Self-enhancement biases and negotiator judgment: Effects of self-esteem and mood, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 110-133.
23. Kramer, R., Pommerenke, P., & Newton, E. (1993), The social context of negotiation: Effects of social identity and accountability on negotiator judgment and decision making, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 633-654.
24. March, J. G., Schulz, M, & Zhou, X. (2000), The dynamics of rules: Change in written organizational codes, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25. Molander, P. (1985), The optimal level of generosity in a selfish, uncertain environment, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29, 611-618.
26. Novak, M. & Sigmund, K. (1992), Tit-for-Tat in heterogeneous populations Nature, 355, 250-253.
27. Novak, M. & Sigmund, K. (1993), A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the prisoner's dilemma game, Nature, 364, 56-58.
28. Opotow, S. (1990), Deterring moral exclusion, Journal of Social Issues. 46, 173-182.
29. Ostrom, E. (1998), A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action, Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review, 92, 1-22.
30. Ross, L. (1977), The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings, In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology, 10. New York: Academic Press.
31. Thompson, L. (1998), The mind and heart of the negotiator, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32. Watson, J. (1980), The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA, (Norton Critical Edition). New York: W. W. Norton.
33. Wilson, J. Q. (1993), The moral sense, New York: Free Press.
34. Wu, J., & Axelrod, R. (1997), Coping with noise: How to cope with noise in the iterated prisoner's dilemma, In R. Axelrod (Ed.), The complexities of cooperation.