Evaluation of cochlear implant users' performance using middle and late latency responses

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 266, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 343-350

  Kurnaz, Murat ^a   Satar, Bulent ^a   Yetiser, Sertac ^a  

^a GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Auditory performance; Cochlear implantation; Late latency responses (LLR); Middle latency responses (MLR)

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BALANCE DISORDER; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HEARING; HEARING DISORDER; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REACTION TIME; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 62549099060     PISSN: 09374477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-008-0742-5     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. K Kaga K Kodera E Hirota T Tsuzuku 1991 P300 response to tones and speech sounds after cochlear implant: a case report Laryngoscope 101 8 905 907 10.1288/00005537-199108000-00017
2. N Kraus AG Micco DB Koch 1993 The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users Hear Res 65 1-2 118 124 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90206-G
3. PA Groenen M Makhdoum JL van den Brink MH Stollman AF Snik P van den Broek 1996 The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users Acta Otolaryngol 116 6 785 790 10.3109/00016489609137926
4. PR Kileny A Boerst T Zwolan 1997 Cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli in children with implants Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117 3 Pt 1 161 169 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70169-4
5. S Gallego E Truy A Morgon L Collet 1997 EABRs and surface potentials with a transcutaneous multielectrode cochlear implant Acta Otolaryngol 117 2 164 168 10.3109/00016489709117761
6. J Guiraud S Gallego L Arnold P Boyle E Truy L Collet 2007 Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: on electrically evoked late auditory responses Hear Res 228 1-2 44 57 10.1016/j.heares.2007.01. 022
7. S Archbold ME Lutman DH Marshall 1995 Categories of auditory performance Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166 312 314
8. LJ Hood 1999 A review of objective methods of evaluating auditory neural pathways Laryngoscope 109 11 1745 1748 10.1097/00005537-199911000-00004
9. L Chen D Morales KH Taber LA Hayman 2002 Intracranial auditory pathways: anatomy correlated with evoked response data J Comput Assist Tomogr 26 3 482 485 10.1097/00004728-200205000-00030
10. JB Firszt RD Chambers N Kraus And RM Reeder 2002 Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response Ear Hear 23 6 502 515 10.1097/00003446-200212000-00002
11. J Maurer L Collet H Pelster E Truy S Gallego 2002 Auditory late cortical response and speech recognition in digisonic cochlear implant users Laryngoscope 112 12 2220 2224 10.1097/00005537-200212000-00017