Digital images obtained with a digital camera are not associated with a loss of critical information - A preliminary study

British Dental Journal

Volumn 206, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Peretz, B ^a   Kaffe, I ^a   Amir, E ^b  

^a Department of Paediatric Dentistry ^*

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; RECORDING; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

CHILD; COPYING PROCESSES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 62449288594     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: 17417503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.182     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Shrout M K, Potter B J, Yurgalavage M H, Hildebolt C F, Vannier M W. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiography digitizer. I. A quantitative evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1993; 76: 502-509.
2. Shrout M K, Potter B J, Yurgalavage M H, Hildebolt C F, Vannier M W. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiography digitizer. II. Effects of brightness and contrast adjustments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1993; 76: 510-518.
3. Kaplan I, Dickens R L. Lightening of dark radiographs with a super proportional reducing agent. Quintessence Int 1990; 21: 737-740.
4. Wenzel A, Fejerskov O, Kidd E, Joyston-Bechal S, Groeneveld A. Depth of occlusal caries assessed clinically by conventional film radiographs and by digitized processed radiographs. Caries Res 1990; 24: 327-333.
5. Wenzel A, Larsen M J, Fejerskov O. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitations by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs. Caries Res 1991; 25: 365-375.
6. Hangiandreou N J, OConnor T J, Felmlee T P. An evaluation of the signal and noise characteristics of four CCD-based film digitizers. Med Phys 1998; 25: 2020-2026.
7. Schulze R K, Rosing S T, DHoedt B. Contrast perception in digitized panoramic radiographs compared with their film-based origin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 388-394.
8. Parissis N, Kondylidou-Sidira A, Tsirlis A, Patias P. Conventional radiographs vs digitized radiographs: image quality assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 353-356.
9. Fuge K N, Stuck A M, Love R M. A comparison of digitally scanned radiographs with conventional film for the detection of small endodontic instruments. Int Endod J 1998; 31: 123-126.
10. Larson A, Lynch D A, Zeligman B et al. Accuracy of diagnosis of subtle chest disease and subtle fractures with a teleradiology system. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 19-22.
11. Janhom A, van Ginkel F C, van Amerongen J P, van der Stelt P F. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30: 166-171.
12. Goga R, Chandler N P, Love R M. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 103-107.
13. Chandler N P, Pitt Ford T R, Monteith B D. Pulp size in molars: underestimation on radiographs. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 764-769.
14. Ludlow J B, Abreu M Jr. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 26-30.
15. Attaelmanan A, Borg E, Grndahl H G. Digitization and display of intra-oral films. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 97-102.