Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 166-171

  Janhom, A ^a   Van Ginkel, F C ^a   Van Amerongen, J P ^a   Van Der Stelt, P F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dental caries; Digital radiography, dental; Observer variation; Radiographic image enhancement

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIODENSITOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATA DISPLAY; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; HUMANS; MOLAR; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; STATISTICS; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0035350526     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600604     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Pysher L, Harlow C. Teleradiology using low-cost consumer-oriented computer hardware and software. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 1181-1184.
2. Berry RF, Barry MH. Evaluation of a personal-computer-based teleradiology system serving an isolated Canadian community. Can Assoc Radiol J 1998; 49: 7-11.
3. Kassebaum DK, McDavid WD, Dove SB, Waggener RG. Spatial resolution requirements for digitizing dental radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 67: 760-769.
4. Shrout MK, Potter BJ, Yurgalavage HM, Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiographic digitizer I: A quantitative evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76: 502-509.
5. Shrout MK, Potter BJ, Yurgalavage HM, Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiographic digitizer II: Effects of brightness and contrast adjustments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76: 510-518.
6. Ohki M, Okano T, Nakamura T. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23: 77-82.
7. Yuasa H, Ariji Y, Ohki M, Naitoh M, Shiojima M, Ushida M, Ariji E. Joint Photographic Experts Group compression of intraoral radiographs for image transmission on the World Wild Web. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 93-99.
8. Jones DEA. A note on back-scatter and depth doses for elongated rectangular X-ray fields. Br J Radiol 1948; 22: 342-345.
9. Jones DEA, Raine HC, Mix D. Correspondence to the editor. Br J Radiol 1949, 22: 549-550.
10. Svenson B, Peterson A. Influence of different developing solutions and developing times on radiographic caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1990; 19: 157-160.
11. Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. Clinical and pathological features of dental caries. In: Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O, (eds). Textbook of clinical cariology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard textbook, 1994, pp 111-157.
12. Møystad A, Svanæs DB, Larheim TA, Gröndahl H-G. Effect of image magnification of digitized bitewing radiographs on approximal caries detection: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 255-259.
13. Hildebolt CF, Bartlett TQ, Brunsden BS, Hente NL, Gravier MJ, Walkup RK, et al. Bitewing-based alveolar bone densitometry: digital imaging resolution requirements. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23: 129-134.
14. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, Lobach SR, Van der Stelt PF. Reduction in size of digital images: does it lead to loss detectability or loss of diagnostic information? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27: 93-96.