No child left behind, the individuals with disabilities education act and functional curricula: A conflict of interest?

Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-13

  Bouck, Emily C ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62449116060     PISSN: 15470350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Benz, M. R., Lindstrom, L., & Latta, T. (1999). Improving collaboration between schools and vocational rehabilitation: The youth transition program model. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 13, 55-63.
2. Benz, M. R., Lindstrom, L. E., & Yovanoff, P. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509-529.
3. Bigge, J. (1988). Curriculum based instruction for special education students. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
4. Bigge, J. L., Stump, C. S., Spagna, M. E., & Silberman, R. K. (1999). Curriculum, assessment, and instruction for students with disabilities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5. Billingsley, F. (1997, December). The problem and the place of functional skills in inclusive settings. In G. Singer (Chair), The role of functional skills and behavior instructional methods in inclusive education. The Annual Meeting for Persons with Severe Handicaps. Boston, MA.
6. Billingsley, F. F., & Albertson, L. R. (1999). Finding a future for functional skills. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 298-302.
7. Bouck, E. C. (2007). Lost in translation?: Educating secondary students with mild mental impairment. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 18, 79-87.
8. Bouck, E. C. (2004a). Exploring secondary special education for mild mental impairment: A program in search of its place. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 367-382.
9. Bouck, E. C. (2004b). The state of curriculum for secondary students with mild mental retardation. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 169-176.
10. Branstad, T., Acosta, A., Bartlett, S., Berdine, W., Butterfield, P., Chambers, J., et al. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
11. Brick, B. (2005). Changing concepts of equal educational opportunity: A comparison of the views of Thomas Jefferson, Horace Mann, and John Dewey. American Educational History Journal, 32, 166-174.
12. Brown, L., McLean, M. B., Hamre-Nietupski, S., Pumpian, I., Creto, N. & Gruenewald, L. (1979). A strategy for developing chronological age-appropriate and functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults. Journal of Special Education, 13, 81-90.
13. Cameto, R., & Levine, P. (2005). Changes in employment status and job characteristics of out-of-school youth with disabilities. In M. Wagner, L. Newman, R. Cameto, & P. Levine, (Eds.), Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved August 22, 2005, from http://www.nlts2.org/pdfs/str6-ch5.pdf Clark, G. M. (1994). Is a functional curriculum approach compatible with an inclusive education model? Teaching Exceptional Children, 26(2), 36-39.
14. Combleth, C. (1985). Critical thinking and cognitive processes. In W. B. Stanley (Ed.), Review of research in social education 1976-1983 (pp. 11-63). Boulder, CO: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies Education.
15. Cronin, M. E. (1996). Life skills curriculum for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 53-68.
16. Cuban, L. (2003). Why have American public schools become an arm of the economy? In Why is it so hard to get good schools? (pp. 5-22). Teachers College Press: New York.
17. Curtis, C. K. (1991). Social studies for at-risk and with disabilities. InJ. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 345-356). New York: Macmillan.
18. Dever, R. B., & Knapczyk, D. R. (1997). Teaching persons with mental retardation: A model for curriculum development and teaching. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
19. Dorn, S., & Fuchs, D. (2004). Trends in placement issues. In A. M. Sorrells, H. J. Rieth, & P. T. Sindelar (Eds.), Critical issues in special education: Access, diversity, and accountability. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Edgar, E. (1988). Employment as an outcome for mildly handicapped students: Current status and future direction. Focus on Exceptional Children, 21, 1-8.
21. Edgar, E., & Polloway, E. A. (1994). Education for adolescents with disabilities: Curriculum and placement issues. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 438-452.
22. Falvey, M. (1989). Community-based curriculum: Instructional strategies for students with severe handicaps. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
23. Field, S., LeRoy, B., & Rivera, S. (1994). Meeting functional curriculum needs in the middle school general education classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 26(2), 40-43.
24. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasiexperimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149-164.
25. Halpern, A. S., & Benz, M. R. (1987). A statewide examination of secondary special education for students with mild disabilities: Implications for the high school curriculum. Exceptional Children, 54, 122-129.
26. Hanushek, E. A. (1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 84-117.
27. Heyneman, S. (2003). Education, social cohesion, and the future role of international organizations. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(3), 25-38.
28. IDEA. (1997). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments 1997. Retrieved January 4, 2004 from http://www.ed.gov/office/OSERS/Policy/IDEA/ the-law.html
29. Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446 (2004).
30. Kleinert, H. L., & Thurlow, M. L. (2001). An introduction to alternate assessment. In H. L. Kleinert & J. F. Kearns (Eds.) Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
31. Knowlton, E. (1998). Considerations in the design of personalized curricular supports for students with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 95-107.
32. Latish, D. (2003). Into the mix: Policy, practice, and research. ASCD Infobrief, 34. Retrieved June 8, 2004 from http://www.ascd.org/publications/ infobrief/issue34.html
33. Miller, D. R. (1994). On your own: A functional skills activity for adolescents with mild disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 26(3), 29-32.
34. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and NCTM standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
35. Nietupski, H., Hamre-Nietupski, S., Curtin, S., & Shrikanth, K. (1997). A review of curricular research in severe disabilities from 1976 to 1995 in six selected journals. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 59-60.
36. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
37. Nolet, V., & McLaughlin, M.J. (2000). Accessing the general curriculum: Including students with disabilities in standards-based reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
38. Patton, J. R., Cronin, M. E., & Bassett, D. S. (1997). A life skills approach to mathematics instruction: Preparing students with learning disabilities for the real-life math demands of adulthood. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 178-187.
39. Patton, J. R., Cronin, M. E., & Jairrels, V. (1997). Curricular implications of transition: Life skills as an integral part of transition education. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 294-306.
40. Patton, J., Polloway, E., & Cronin, M. (1987). Social studies instruction for handicapped students: A review of current practices. The Social Studies, 78, 131-135.
41. Patton, J. R., Polloway, E. A., & Smith, T. E. C. (2000). Educating students with mild mental retardation. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 80-89.
42. Patton, J. R., Smith, T. E. C., Clark, G. M., Polloway, E. A., Edgar, E., & Lee, S. (1996). Individuals with mild mental retardation: Postsecondary outcomes and implications for educational policy. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 75-85.
43. Polloway, E. A., Patton, J. R., Smith, J. D. & Roderique, T. W. (1991). Issues in program design for elementary students with mild retardation: Emphasis on curriculum development. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 142-150.
44. Polloway, E. A., Smith, J. D., Chamberlain, J., Denning, C. B., & Smith, T. E. C. (1999). Levels of deficit vs. levels of support in mental retardation classification. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 24, 200-206.
45. Retish, P., Hitchings, W., Horvath, M., & Schmalle, B. (1991). Students with mild disabilities in the secondary school. New York: Longman.
46. Sabornie, E. J., & deBettencourt, L. U. (1997). Teaching students with mild disabilities at the secondary level. Merrill: Columbus, OH.
47. Sanders, W., & Rivers, J. C. (1996, November). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
48. Schmalle, B., & Retish, P. M. ( 1989). Job-task reporting system. Teaching Exceptional Children, 21(2), 14-18.
49. Sitlington, P., Frank, A. R., & Carson, R. (1993). Adult adjustment among high school graduates with mild disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 221-233.
50. Smith, T. E. C., & Puccini, I. K. (1995). Position statement: Secondary curricula and policy issues for students with MR. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 275-282.
51. Snell, M. E. (1997). Teaching children and young adults with mental retardation in school programs: Current research. Behavior Change, 14, 73-105.
52. Snell, M., & Browder, D. (1987). Domestic and community skills. In M. Snell (Ed.) Systematic instruction of persons with severe handicaps (pp. 390-434). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
53. Thompson, S. J., Quenemoen, R. F., Thurlow, M. L., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2001). Alternate assessments for students with disabilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc; Council for Exceptional Children.
54. Trybus, M. A. (2004). The challenge and hope of scientifically based research. Learning Points Associates (Ed.), Improving student achievement and teacher effectiveness through scientifically based practices. Viewpoints Volume 11. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved April 25, 2007, from http://www.ncrel.org/policy/pubs/pdfs/vp11.pdf
55. Turnbull, R., Huerta, N., & Stowe, M. (2006). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act as Amended in 2004. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56. United States Department of Education. (2007). Federal Register April 9, 2007 Regulation: Title I - Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged; Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA); Final Rule. Retrieved April 25, 2007, from http://www.education.unin.edu/NCEO/2percentReg/ FederalRegApril9TwoPercent.pdf
57. Wagner, M. (2003). Changes in household arrangements and social activities of out-of-school youth with disabilities. In M. Wagner, L. Newman, R. Cameto, & P. Levine (Eds.), Changes over time in early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved August 22, 2005, from http://www.nlts2.org/pdfs/str6-ch3.pdf
58. Wagner, M., D'Amico, R., Jay, E., Butler-Natlin, P., Marder, C., & Cox, R. (1992). What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
59. Weaver, R., Landers, M. F., & Adams, S. (1991). Making curriculum functional: Special education and beyond. Intervention in School and Clinic, 26, 284-287.
60. Whitehurst, G. (2003, April). The Institute of Education Science: New wine, new bottle. Presented at die Annual Conference of the American Education Research Association. Retrieved June 22, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/ research/pubs/ies.html
61. Yell, M. L., & Drasgow, E. (2005). No Child Left Behind: A guide for professionals. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
62. Ysseldyke, J. E., Olsen, K., & Thurlow, M. (1997). Issues and considerations in alternate assessments. (Synthesis Report 27). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota: National Center on Educational Outcomes.