Studies on the role of site-binding and competitive adsorption in determining the charge of nanofiltration membranes

Desalination

Volumn 241, Issue 1-3, 2009, Pages 315-330

  Bruni, Luigi ^a   Bandini, Serena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Competitive adsorption; Electrolytes; Membrane charge; Nanofiltration; Polyamide Membranes; Site binding

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; DISSOLUTION; ELECTROLYTES; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; IONS; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; POLYAMIDES; POLYMERS; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SALTS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS; COMPETITIVE ADSORPTION; COUNTER IONS; HYDROPHILIC GROUPS; HYDROPHILIC SITES; HYDROPHOBIC GROUPS; HYDROPHOBIC SITES; MEMBRANE CHARGE; POLYAMIDE MEMBRANES; SALT CONCENTRATIONS; SITE-BINDING;

BINDING SITES;

ADSORPTION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ELECTROLYTE; MEMBRANE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PH; SALT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 62349134680     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.12.055     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Hagmeyer G., and Gimbel R. Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary mixtures and for single salts at different pH values. Desalination 117 (1998) 247-256
2. Xu Y., and Lebrun R.E. Investigation of the solute separation by charged nanofiltration membrane: effect of pH, ionic strength and solute type. J. Membr. Sci. 158 (1999) 93-104
3. Labbez C., Fievet P., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., and Pagetti J. Retention of mineral salts by a polyamide nanofiltration membrane. Sep. Purific. Technol. 30 (2003) 47-55
4. Bandini S., Drei J., and Vezzani D. The role of pH and concentration on the ion rejection in polyamide nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 264 (2005) 65-74
5. Quin J., Oo M.H., Lee H., and Coniglio B. Effect of feed pH on permeate pH and ion rejection under acidic conditions in NF process. J. Membr. Sci. 232 (2004) 153-159
6. Bowen W.R., and Welfoot J.S. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration * critical assessment and model development. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57 (2002) 1121-1137
7. Bandini S., and Vezzani D. Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 58 (2003) 3303-3326
8. Wang X., Wang W., and Wang D. Experimental investigation on separation performance of nanofiltration membranes for inorganic electrolyte solutions. Desalination 145 (2002) 115-122
9. Mazzoni C., and Bandini S. On nanofiltration Desal-5 DK performances with calcium chloride_water solutions. Sep. Purific.Technol. 52 (2006) 232-240
10. Mazzoni C., Bruni L., and Bandini S. Nanofiltration: role of electrolyte and pH on Desal DK performaces. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 2254-2262
11. Afonso M.D., Hagmeyer G., and Gimbel R. Streaming potential measurements to assess the variation of nanofiltration membranes surface charge with the concentration of salt solutions. Sep. Purific. Technol. 22-23 (2001) 529-541
12. Childress E., and Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 119 (1996) 253-268
13. Peeters J.M.M., Mulder M.H.V., and Strathmann H. Streaming potential measurements as a characterization method for nanofiltration membranes. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 150 (1999) 247-259
14. Tay J.H., Liu J., and Sun D.D. Effect of solution physico-chemistry on the charge property of nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 36 (2002) 585-598
15. Teixeira M.R., Rosa M.J., and Nystrom M. The role of membrane charge in nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 265 (2005) 160-166
16. Mänttäri M., Pihlajamäki A., and Nyström M. Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membranes at different pH. J. Membr. Sci. 280 (2006) 311-320
17. Ariza M.J., and Benavente J. Streaming potential along the surface of polysulfone membranes: a comparative study between two different experimental systems and determination of electrokinetic and adsorption parameters. J. Membr. Sci. 190 (2001) 119-132
18. Takagi R., and Nakagaki M. Theoretical study of the effect of ion adsorption on membrane potential and its application to colloidon membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 53 (1990) 19-35
19. Takagi R., and Nakagaki M. Membrane potential of separation membranes as affected by ion adsorption. J. Membr. Sci. 71 (1992) 189-200
20. Takagi R., and Nakagaki M. Ionic dialysis through amphoteric membranes. Sep. Purific. Technol. 32 (2003) 65-71
21. de Lint W.B.S., Biesheuvel P.M., and Verweij H. Application of the charge regulation model to transport of ions through hydrophilic membranes: one-dimensional transport model for narrow pores (nanofiltration). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 251 (2002) 131-142
22. Bandini S. Modelling the mechanism of charge formation in NF membranes: theory and application. J. Membr. Sci. 264 (2005) 75-86
23. Bandini S., and Mazzoni C. Modelling the amphoteric behaviour of polyamide nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 184 (2005) 1307-1316
24. L. Bruni and S. Bandini, The role of the electrolyte on the mechanism of charge formation in polyamide nanofiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.061.
25. S. Bandini and L. Bruni, On the mechanisms of charge formation in nanofiltration membranes, in: A. Szymczyk (Ed.), Surface electrical phenomena in membranes and microchannels, Research Signpost, accepted for publication.
26. Bowen W.R., and Mukhtar H. Characterisation and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 126 (1997) 91-105
27. Bowen W.R., and Mohammad A.W. Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance * a general assessment. Inst. Chem. Eng. 76A (1998) 885-893
28. Tsuru T., Urairi M., Nakao S., and Kimura S. Reverse osmosis of single and mixed electrolyte with charged membranes: experiments and analysis. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn 24 (1991) 519-524
29. Tsuru T., Nakao S., and Kimura S. Calculation of ion rejection by extended Nernst-Planck equation with charged reverse osmosis membranes for single and mixed electrolyte solutions. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 24 (1991) 511-517
30. Wang X.L., Tsuru T., Nakao S., and Kimura S. Electrolyte transport through nanofiltration membranes by the space-charge model and the comparison with Teorell-Meyer-Sievers model. J. Membr. Sci. 103 (1995) 117-133
31. Wang X.L., Tsuru T., Nakao S., Togoh T., and Kimura S. Evaluation of pore structure and electrical properties of nanofiltration membranes. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 28 (1995) 186-192
32. Scheap J., Vandecasteele C., Mohammad A.W., and Bowen W.R. Modelling the retention of ionic components for different nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purific. Technol. 22-23 (2001) 169-179
33. Hagmeyer G., and Gimbel R. Modelling the rejection of nanofiltration membranes using zeta potential measurements. Sep. Purific. Technol. 15 (1999) 19-30
34. Hall M.S., Starov V.M., and Lloyd D.R. Reverse osmosis of multicomponent electrolyte solutions. Part I. Theoretical development. J. Membr. Sci. 128 (1997) 23-37
35. In: Lyklema J. (Ed). Fundamentals of interface and colloid science, vol. II: solid-liquid interfaces (1995), Academic Press, New York, London
36. Szymczyk A., and Fievet P. Investigating transport properties of nanofiltration membranes by means of a steric, electric and dielectric exclusion model. J. Membr. Sci. 252 (2005) 77-88
37. Yates D.E., Levine S., and Healy T.W. Site-binding model of the electrical double layer at the oxide/water interface. J. Chem. Soc. Farad. Trans. I 70 (1974) 1807-1818
38. Davis J.A., James R.O., and Leckie J.O. Surface ionization and complexation at the oxide/water interface. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 63 (1978) 480-499
39. Schaep J., and Vandecasteele C. Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 188 (2001) 129-136