The combined use of simulation and navigation to demonstrate hip kinematics

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 91, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages 144-152

  Thornberry, Robert L ^a   Hogan, Andrew J ^a  

^a Tallahassee Orthopedic Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HIP; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; PHYSIOLOGY; STEREOTACTIC PROCEDURE;

BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES;

EID: 62249190675     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01547     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Thornberry RL, Lavernia CJ, Barrack RL, Tozakoglou E. The effects of neck geometry and acetabular design on the motion to impingement in total hip reconstruction (THR). Presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1998 Mar 19-23; New Orleans, LA. SE 046.
2. Lavernia CJ, Barrack RL, Thornberry RL, Tozakoglou E. The effects component position in motion to impingement and dislocation in total hip reconstruction (THR). Presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1998 Mar 19-23; New Orleans, LA. SE 058.
3. DiGioia AM 3rd, O'Toole RV, Jaramaz B, Simon D, Blackwell M, Morgan F. A computer-assisted planner and intraoperative guidance system for the accurate placement of acetabular implants. Presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1996 Feb 22-26; Atlanta, GA. SE 075.
4. Crockett HC, Wright JM, Sculco TP, Bates J. Mini-incision for primary total hip arthroplasty. Presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1998 Mar 19-23; New Orleans, LA. SE 060.
5. Berry DJ. ''Minimally invasive'' total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:699-700.
6. Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini RM, Della Valle C, Paprosky W, Rosenberg AG. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:239-47.
7. Haaker RG, Tiedjen K, Ottersbach A, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M, Stiehl JB. Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:151-9.
8. Digioia AM 3rd, Jaramaz B, Plakseychuk AY, Moody JE Jr, Nikou C, Labarca RS, Levison TJ, Picard F. Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:359-64.
9. Paradigm Productions. Hip range of motion comparisons. CD-ROM. Memphis, TN: Smith and Nephew; 1998.
10. Noble PC, Sugano N, Johnston JD, Thompson MT, Conditt MA, Engh CA Sr, Mathis KB. Computer simulation: how can it help the surgeon optimize implant position? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:242-52.
11. Otake Y, Suzuki N, Hattori A, Hagio K, Sugano N, Yonenobu K, Ochi T. Four- dimensional model of the lower extremity after total hip arthroplasty. J Biomech. 2005;38:2397-405.
12. Leardini A, Belvedere C, Astolfi L, Fantozzi S, Viceconti M, Taddei F, Ensini A, Benedetti MG, Catani F. A new software tool for 3D motion analyses of the musculo-skeletal system. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21:870-9.
13. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112-20.
14. Eckman K, Nikou C, Lattanzi R, Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM 3rd. Experimental validation of hip range of motion simulator. Presented at the 3rd Annual Meeting of the International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; 2003 Jun 18-21; Marbella, Spain. Special poster no. 17.
15. Tannast M, Kubiak-Langer M, Langlotz F, Puls M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA. Noninvasive three-dimensional assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:122-31.
16. Thornberry RL, Nelson LS. CT evaluation of combined native hip ROM using computer simulations. Presented at the 6th Combined Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Societies; 2007 Oct 21-24; Honolulu, HI. Poster no. 0459.
17. Thornberry RL, Nelson LS. Combined native hip range of motions. Presented at the 6th Combined Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Societies; 2007 Oct 21-24; Honolulu, HI. Poster no. 0456.
18. Thornberry RL, Nelson LS. Effect of elevated-rim liner position on motion to impingement in THA. Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; 2008 Mar 2-5; San Francisco, CA. Poster no. 1761.
19. Thornberry RL, Nelson LS. Effect of femoral head size and implantation variability on reestablishing normal combined hip motions. Presented at the 6th Combined Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Societies; 2007 Oct 21-24; Honolulu, HI. Poster no. 0159.
20. Green WBB, Heckman JD, editors. The clinical measurement of joint motion. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1994. The hip;p 99-114.
21. Ahlberg A, Moussa M, Al-Nahdi M. On geographical variations in the normal range of joint motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;234:229-31.
22. Joint motion: method of measuring and recording. Chicago: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1965.
23. Range of joint motion and method of measurement. Tokyo: Japanese Orthopaedic Association; 1995.
24. Sugano N, Yamanashi W, Sasama T, Sato Y, Nishii T, Miki H, Yoshikawa H. Ranges of motion in anatomically normal hips using computer collision detection. Read at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; 2003 Feb 2-5; New Orleans, LA. Paper no. 0155.
25. Boone DC, Azen SP. Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:756-9.
26. Roaas A, Andersson GB. Normal range of motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, 30-40 years of age. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53:205-8.
27. Minoda Y, Kadowaki T, Kim M. Acetabular component orientation in 834 total hip arthroplasties using a manual technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:186-91.
28. Yamaguchi M, Akisue T, Bauer TW, Hashimoto Y. The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:305-13.
29. Cobb TK, Morrey BF, Ilstrup DM. The elevated-rim acetabular liner in total hip arthroplasty: relationship to postoperative dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:80-6.
30. Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1832-42.
31. Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:89-99.
32. Babisch JW, Layher F, Amiot LP. The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:357-65.
33. Crowninshield RD, Maloney WJ, Wentz DH, Humphrey SM, Blanchard CR. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:102-7.
34. Burroughs BR, Hallstrom B, Golladay GJ, Hoeffel D, Harris WH. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:11-9.
35. Usrey MM, Noble PC, Rudner L J, Conditt MA, Birman MV, Santore RF, Mathis KB. Does neck/liner impingement increase wear of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene liners? J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(6 Suppl 2):65-71.
36. Yamaguchi M, Bauer TW, Hashimoto Y. Three-dimensional analysis of multiple wear vectors in retrieved acetabular cups. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1539-44.