(iv) Surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty - pros and cons

Orthopaedics and Trauma

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 27-34

  van Dijk, C M ^a,b   Bimmel, R ^a,b   Haddad, Fares S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b R Bimmel MD is Orthopaedic Registrar in Nij Smellinghe   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

approach; hip; minimally invasive; surgical technique

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAIT; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUSLY ASSISTED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 62149138998     PISSN: 18771327     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mporth.2009.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Khan R.J.K., Fick D., Khoo P., et al. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty. Description of a new technique. J Arthroplasty 21 7 (2006) 1038-1046
2. Meneghini R.M., Smits S.A., Swinford R.R., and Bahamonde R.E. A randomized, prospective study of 3 minimally invasive surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty comprehensive gait analysis. J Arthroplasty 23 6 Suppl. 1 (2008) 68-73
3. Laffosse J.M., Chiron P., Molinier F., Bensafi H., and Puget J. Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement; early results. Int Orthopaedics 31 (2007) 597-603
4. Ogonda L., Wilson R., Archbold P., et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve postoperative outcomes: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 701-710
5. Dorr L.D., Maheshwari A.V., Long W.T., Wan Z., and Sirianni L.E. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 89 (2007) 1153-1160
6. Mulliken BD, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Nayak N. The surgical approach to total hip arthroplasty: complications and utility of a modified direct lateral approach. Iowa Orthop J; 15: 48-61.
7. Jacobs M.A., Goytia R.N., and Bhargava T. Hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach surgical description and early review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 (2008) 38-44
8. Matta J.M., Shahrdar C., and Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441 (2005) 115-124
9. Kennon R.E., Keggi J.M., Wetmore R.S., Zatorski L.E., Huo M.H., and Keggi K.J. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 85 (2003) 39-48
10. Berry D.J., Berger R.A., Callaghan J.J., et al. Symposium: minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 (2003) 2235-2246
11. Mardones R., Pagnano M.W., and Nemanich J.P. Muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441 (2005) 63-67
12. Pagnano M, Lewallen D, Hanssen A. Two-incision THA in 80 consecutive unselected patients: prevalence of complications. Program and abstracts of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 72nd Annual Meeting; February 23-27, 2005; Washington, DC. Course Number 144.
13. Penenberg B.L., Bolling W.S., and Riley M. Percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty (PATH): a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 (2008) 209-220
14. Duwelius P.J., Burkhart R.L., Hayhurst J.O., Moller H., and Butler J.B.V. Comparison of the 2-incision and mini-incision posterior total hip arthroplasty technique, a Retrospective Match-Pair Controlled Study. J Arthroplasty 22 1 (2007) 48-56
15. Nakata K., Nishikawa M., Yamamoto K., Hirota S., and Yoshikawa H. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach; two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty (2008) [Epub ahead of print]
16. Chen D.W., Hu C.C., Chang Y.H., Yang W.E., and Lee M.S. Comparison of clinical outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty by conventional anterolateral transgluteal or 2-incision approach. A retrospective, case-controlled investigation with 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty (2008) [Epub ahead of print]
17. Archibeck M.J., and White Jr. R.E. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429 (2004) 232-238
18. Williams S.L., Bachison C., Michelson J.D., and Manner P.A. Component position in 2-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty compared to standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23 2 (2008) 197-202
19. Ali Khan M.A., Brakenbury P.H., and Reynolds I.S. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63 (1981) 214-218
20. Woolson S.T., Mow C.S., Syquia J.F., Lannin J.V., and Schurman D.J. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 86 (2004) 1353-1358
21. Goldstein WM, Ali R, Murphy SI, et al. Patient priorities and importance of cosmesis after THA: standard versus minimal incision. Presented at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 72nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, February 23-27, 2005.