Predicting outcome with the Level of Service Inventory-Revised: The importance of implementation integrity

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 523-529

  Flores, Anthony W ^a   Lowenkamp, Christopher T ^b   Holsinger, Alexander M ^c   Latessa, Edward J ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750844524     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Andrews D.A. The Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI): The first follow-up (1982), Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2. Andrews D.A., and Bonta J. LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised (1995), Multi-Health Systems, Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3. Andrews D.A., and Bonta J. The psychology of criminal conduct (2003), Anderson, Cincinnati, OH
4. Andrews D.A., and Robinson D. The Level of Supervision Inventory: Second report (1984), Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
5. Applegate B., Cullen F.T., and Fisher B.S. Public support for correctional treatment: The continuing appeal of the rehabilitative ideal. Prison Journal 77 (1997) 237-258
6. Bonta J. Offender assessment: General issues and considerations. Forum on Corrections Research (2000, August) 14-18
7. Bonta J., and Andrews D.A. The Level of Supervision Inventory: An overview. IARCA Journal 5 4 (1993) 6-8
8. Bonta J., Bogue B., Crowley M., and Motiuk L. Implementing offender classification systems: Lessons learned. In: Bernfeld G.A., Farrington D.P., and Leschied A.W. (Eds). Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective program (2001), J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, NY 227-245
9. Gendreau P., Goggin C., and Smith P. Is the PCL-R really the "unparalleled" measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior 29 4 (2002) 397-426
10. Gendreau P., Little T., and Goggin C. A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology 34 (1996) 575-607
11. Grove W.M., Zald D.H., Lebow B.S., Snitz B.E., and Nelson C. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment 12 1 (2000) 19-30
12. Harrison P.M., and Beck A.J. Prisoners in 2003 (Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin) (2004), U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
13. Hoge R.D., Andrews D.A., and Leschied A.W. An investigation of risk and protective factors in a sample of youthful offenders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 37 4 (1996) 419-424
14. Kirkpatrick B.L. Exploratory research of female risk prediction and the LSI-R. Corrections Compendium: The National Journal for Corrections 24 (1999) 1-17
15. Lowenkamp C.T., Holsinger A.M., and Latessa E.J. Risk/need assessment, offender classification, and the role of child abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior 28 5 (2001) 543-563
16. McGraw K.O., and Wong S.P. A common language effect size statistic. Psychological Bulletin 111 (1992) 361-365
17. Rettinger, L. J. (1998). A recidivism follow-up study investigating risk and need within a sample of provincially sentenced women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.