Left ventricular functional analysis with 16- and 64-row multidetector computed tomography: Comparison with gated single-photon emission computed tomography

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 8-14

  Agarwal, Prachi P ^a,c   Patel, Smita ^a   Corbett, James ^a   Jung, Jung Im ^b   Barber, Karen ^a   Schipper, Matthew ^a   Kazerooni, Ella A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITALS   (United States)

Author keywords

Left ventricular function; Multidetector CT; SPECT

Indexed keywords

ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PARTICLE BEAMS; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

EJECTION FRACTION; END-DIASTOLIC; END-SYSTOLIC VOLUMES; GOOD CORRELATIONS; LEFT VENTRICULAR; LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION; LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION; VOLUME CORRELATIONS;

PHOTONS;

IODIXANOL; METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M; TETROFOSMIN TC 99M;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GATED IMAGING; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE CONTRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; GATED BLOOD-POOL IMAGING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 62149084522     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181624ad0     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2006;113:e85-e151.
2. Gerber TC, Behrenbeck T, Allison T, et al. Comparison of measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by Tc-99m sestamibi first-pass angiography with electron beam computed tomography in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:1022-1026.
3. Hammermeister KE, DeRouen TA, Dodge HT. Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. Circulation. 1979;59:421-430.
4. Schocken DD, Arrieta MI, Leaverton PE, et al. Prevalence and mortality rate of congestive heart failure in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:301-306.
5. Shah PK, Maddahi J, Staniloff HM, et al. Variable spectrum and prognostic implications of left and right ventricular ejection fractions in patients with and without clinical heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58:387-393.
6. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, et al. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987;76:44-51.
7. Mock MB, Ringqvist I, Fisher LD, et al. Survival of medically treated patients in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) registry. Circulation. 1982;66:562-568.
8. Savino G, Zwerner P, Herzog C, et al. CT of cardiac function. J Thorac Imaging. 2007;22:86-100.
9. Antonini-Canterin FNG. Valutazione ecocardiografica dei volumi e della funzione sistolica globale del ventricolo sinistra. Ital Heart J. 2000;1:1261-1272.
10. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1475-1497.
11. Tadamura E, Kudoh T, Motooka M, et al. Assessment of regional and global left ventricular function by reinjection T1-201 and rest Tc-99m sestamibi ECG-gated SPECT: comparison with three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:991-997.
12. Vaduganathan P, He ZX, Vick GW 3rd, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular wall motion, volumes, and ejection fraction by gated myocardial tomography with technetium 99m - labeled tetrofosmin: a comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999;6:3-10.
13. Bavelaar-Croon CD, Kayser HW, van der Wall EE, et al. Left ventricular function: correlation of quantitative gated SPECT and MR imaging over a wide range of values. Radiology. 2000;217:572-575.
14. Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2004;230:403-410.
15. Heuschmid M, Rothfuss J, Schroder S, et al. Left ventricular functional parameters: comparison of 16-slice spiral CT with MRI. Rofo. 2005;177:60-66.
16. Mahnken AH, Spuntrup E, Wildberger JE, et al. Quantification of cardiac function with multislice spiral CT using retrospective EKG-gating: comparison with MRI. Rofo. 2003;175:83-88.
17. Wintersperger BJ, Herzog P, Jakobs T, et al. Initial experience with the clinical use of a 16 detector row CT system. Crit Rev Comput Tomogr. 2002;43:283-316.
18. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S, et al. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging. Radiology. 2005;234:381-390.
19. Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P, et al. Comparison of 64-slice CT with gated SPECT for evaluation of left ventricular function. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1288-1294.
20. Juergens KU, Fischbach R. Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:342-357.
21. Bax JJ, Lamb H, Dibbets P, et al. Comparison of gated single-photon emission computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of left ventricular function in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:1299-1305.
22. Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA, Danias PG. Electrocardiogram-gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:2059-2068.
23. Nakajima K, Taki J, Higuchi T, et al. Gated SPET quantification of small hearts: mathematical simulation and clinical application. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:1372-1379.
24. Faber TL, Vansant JP, Pettigrew RI, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular endocardial volumes and ejection fractions computed from gated perfusion SPECTwith magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of two methods. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001;8:645-651.
25. Johnson LL, Verdesca SA, Aude WY, et al. Postischemic stunning can affect left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion on post-stress gated sestamibi tomograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30: 1641-1648.
26. Mahnken AH, Spuentrup E, Niethammer M, et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of left ventricular volume with ECG-gated multislice spiral CT: value of different image reconstruction algorithms in comparison to MRI. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:604-611.
27. Juergens KU, Maintz D, Grude M, et al. Multi-detector row computed tomography of the heart: does a multi-segment reconstruction algorithm improve left ventricular volume measurements? Eur Radiol. 2005;15:111-117.
28. Boehm T, Alkadhi H, Roffi M, et al. Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using 4-channel MDCT. Rofo. 2004;176: 529-537.
29. Koch K, Oellig F, Kunz P, et al. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Rofo. 2004;176:1786-1793.
30. Juergens KU, Seifarth H, Maintz D, et al. MDCT determination of volume and function of the left ventricle: are short-axis image reformations necessary? AJR. 2006;186:S371-S378.
31. Muhlenbruch G, Das M, Hohl C, et al. Global left ventricular function in cardiac CT. Evaluation of an automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1117-1123.
32. Schlosser T, Pagonidis K, Herborn CU, et al. Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineation. AJR. 2005;184: 765-773.
33. Hall SA, Cigarroa CG, Marcoux L, et al. Time course of improvement in left ventricular function, mass and geometry in patients with congestive heart failure treated with beta-adrenergic blockade. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1154-1161.
34. Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, et al. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology. 2003;226:145-152.
35. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation. 2005; 112:2318-2323.
36. Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, et al. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation. 2007; 116:1290-1305.
37. Earls J. Prospectively Gated Axial (PGA) Coronary CT Angiography: How to Achieve an 80% Radiation Dose Reduction with Improved Image Quality. Presented at: 9th Annual International Symposium on Multidetector-Row CT; June 13-16, 2007; San Francisco, CA.