CT of cardiac function

Journal of Thoracic Imaging

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 86-100

  Savino, Giancarlo ^a,b   Zwerner, Peter ^b   Herzog, Christopher ^b,c   Politi, Marco ^a   Bonomo, Lorenzo ^a   Costello, Philip ^b   Joseph Schoepf, U ^b  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Global; MDCT; Regional; Ventricle function

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEART FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE CONTRACTILITY; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE; IMAGING SYSTEM; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; HEART DISEASE; HEART VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW;

HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION;

EID: 34247093879     PISSN: 08835993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3180317433     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. White HDNR, Brown MA, Brandt PW, et al. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987;76:44-51.
2. Schoepf UJ, Savino G, Lake DR, et al. The age of CT pulmonary angiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2005;20:273-279.
3. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 2002;106:2051-2054.
4. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation. 2003;107:664-666.
5. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-versus-segment-based analysis. Circulation. 2004;110:2638-2643.
6. Dewey M, Laule M, Krug L, et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:223-229.
7. Hamoir XL, Flohr T, Hamoir V, et al. Coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and optimal reconstruction window in retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT at 375-ms gantry rotation time. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:296-3041.
8. Dunn FGPS. Sudden cardiac death, ventricular arrhythmias and hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy. J Hypertens. 1993;11:1003-1010.
9. Ghali JKLY, Cooper RS. Influence of left ventricular geometric patterns on prognosis in patients with or without coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:1635-1640.
10. Mock MB, Ringqvist I, Fisher LD, et al. Survival of medically treated patients in the coronary artery surgery (CASS) registry. Circulation. 1982;66:562-568.
11. Candell-Riera JLJ, Santana C, Castell J, et al. Prognostic assessment of uncomplicated first myocardial infarction by exercise echocardiography and Tc-99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001;8:122-128.
12. Antonini-Canterin FNG. Valutazione ecocardiografica dei volumi e della funzione sistolica globale del ventricolo sinistro. Ital Heart J. 2000;1:1261-1272.
13. Malm S, Frigstad S, Sagberg E, et al. Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1030-1035.
14. Bavelaar-Croon CD, Kayser HW, van der Wall EE, et al. Left ventricular function: correlation of quantitative gated SPECT and MR imaging over a wide range of values. Radiology. 2000;217:572-575.
15. Manrique A, Faraggi M, Vera P, et al. TI-201 and Tc-99m MIBI gated SPECT in patients with large perfusion defects and left ventricular dysfunction: comparison with equilibrium radionuclide angiography. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:805-809.
16. Slart RHJA, Bax JJ, de Jong RM, et al. Comparison of gated PET with MRI for evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:176-182.
17. Bodenheimer MMBV, Fooshee CM, Hermann GA, et al. Comparison of wall motion and regional ejection fraction at rest and during isometric exercise: concise communication. J Nucl Med. 1979;20:724-732.
18. Lapeyre ACKE III, Rogers PJ, Sinak LJ, et al. Quantitation of regional ejection fractions using gated tomographic imaging with 99 mTc-sestamibi. Chest. 2005;127:778-786.
19. Juergens KUMD, Grude M, Boese JM, et al. Multi-detector row computed tomography of the heart: does a multi-segment reconstruction algorithm improve left ventricular volume measurements? Eur Radiol. 2005;15:111-117.
20. Mahnken AHKM, Bruners P, Spuentrup E, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging - study in pigs. Radiology. 2005;236:112-117.
21. Mahnken AHSE, Niethammer M, Buecker A, et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of left ventricular volume with ECG-gated multislice spiral CT: value of different image reconstruction algorithms in comparison to MRI. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:604-611.
22. Boese JMBM, Albers J, van Kaick G. Optimizing temporal resolution in CT with retrospective ECG gating. Radiology. 2000;40:123-129.
23. Ritchie CJGJ, Crawford CR, Stanford W, et al. Minimum scan speeds for suppression of motion artifacts in CT. Radiology. 1992;185:37-42.
24. Bellenger NGBM, Ray SG, Lahiri A, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1387-1396.
25. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Schoepf UJ, et al. Right ventricular enlargement on chest computed tomography: prognostic role in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2004;109:2401-2404.
26. Schoepf UJ, Kucher N, Kipfmueller F, et al. Right ventricular enlargement on chest computed tomography: a predictor of early death in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2004;110:3276-3280.
27. Germano GEJ, Lewin H, Kavanagh PB, et al. Automatic quantitation of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening from gated technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1360-1367.
28. Sechtem USBMW, White RD, Cheitlin MD, et al. Regional left ventricular wall thickening by magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation in normal persons and patients with global and regional dysfunction. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:145-151.
29. Fisher MRvSG, Higgins CB. Multiphasic cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: normal regional left ventricular wall thickening. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;145:27-30.
30. Sharir TBDWP, Areeda J, Kavanagh PB, et al. Quantitative analysis of regional motion and thickening by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: normal heterogeneity and criteria for abnormality. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1630-1638.
31. Manuel D, Cerqueira NJW, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart: a Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539-542.
32. Dirksen MS, Bax JJ, de Roos A, et al. Usefulness of dynamic multislice computed tomography of left ventricular function in unstable angina pectoris and comparison with echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:1157-1160.
33. Dirksen MS, Jukema JW, Bax JJ, et al. Cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with instable angina. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:457-461.
34. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al. Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol. 2005;714-720.
35. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Noninvasive angiography and assessment of left ventricular function using multislice computed tomography in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2905-2910.
36. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the coronary arteries with multislice computed tomography in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2005;45:1-6.
37. Juergens KU, Ozgun M, Maintz D, et al. Analyse der globalen und regionalen linksventrikulären Funktion mittels 16-Zeilen-Spiral- Computertomographie des Herzens im Vergleich zur MR-Tomographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2005;177:S273.
38. Juergens KU, Fischbach R. Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:342-357.
39. Juergens KU, Seifarth H, Maintz D, et al. MDCT determination of volume and function of the left ventricle: are short-axis image reformations necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(6 suppl 2):S371-S378.
40. Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, et al. MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology. 2001;219:264-269.
41. Boehm TAH, Roffi M, Willmann JK, et al. Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using 4-channel MDCT. Rofo. 2004;176:529-537.
42. Dogan HKL, Bax JJ, Schuijf JD, et al. MDCT assessment of right ventricular systolic function. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(6 suppl 2):S366-S370.
43. Kim THRY, Hur J, Kim SJ, et al. Evaluation of right ventricular volume and mass using retrospective ECG-gated cardiac multidetector computed tomography: comparison with first-pass radionuclide angiography. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1781-2043.
44. Wintersperger BJ, Hundt W, Knez A, et al. Left ventricular systolic function assessed by ECG gated multirow-detector spiral computed tomography (MDCT): comparison to ventriculography. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:S192.
45. Hundt W, Siebert K, Becker C, et al. Assessment of global left ventricular function: comparison of multidetector computed tomography with left ventriculography. Radiology. 2002;252:388(P).
46. Juergens KU, Fischbach R, Grude M, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular myocardial function by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT in comparison to cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:S191.
47. Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2004;230:403-410.
48. Dirksen MS, Bax JJ, de Roos A, et al. Usefulness of dynamic multislice computed tomography of left ventricular function in unstable angina pectoris and comparison with echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:1157-1160.
49. Koch K, Oellig F, Kunz P, et al. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice Spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2004;176:1786-1793.