Training neonatal skills with simulators?

Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 636-639

  Cavaleiro, Ap ^a   Guimaraes H ^b   Calheiros, Fl ^b  

^a University of Porto   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Neonatal resuscitation; Simulation based training; Undergraduate curriculum

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESUSCITATION; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SKILL; THEORY; TRAINING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MANIKINS; NEONATOLOGY; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; RESUSCITATION; TEACHING;

EID: 61849084837     PISSN: 08035253     EISSN: 16512227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01176.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Grenvik A, Schaefer JJ 3rd., DeVita MA, Rogers P. New aspects on critical care medicine training. Curr Opin Crit Care 2004 10 : 233 7.
2. Maran NJ, Glavin RJ. Low- to high-fidelity simulation - a continuum of medical education? Med Educ 2003 37 (Suppl 1 22 8.
3. Overly FL, Sudikoff SN, Shapiro MJ. High-fidelity medical simulation as an assessment tool for pediatric residents' airway management skills. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007 23 : 11 5.
4. Halamek LP, Kaegi DM, Gaba DM, Sowb YA, Smith BC, Smith BE, et al. Time for a new paradigm in pediatric medical education: teaching neonatal resuscitation in a simulated delivery room environment. Pediatrics 2000 106 : 1 6.
5. Euliano TY, Mahla ME. Problem-based learning in residency education: a novel implementation using a simulator. J Clin Monit Comput 1999 15 : 227 32.
6. Tsai T-C, Harasym PH, Nijssen-Jordan C, Jennett P, Powell G. The quality of a simulation examination using a high-fidelity child manikin. Med Educ 2003 37 (Suppl 1) : 72 8.
7. Issenberg SB, Pringle S, Harden RM, Khogah S, MS G. Adoption and integration of simulation-based learning technologies into the curriculum of a UK undergraduate education programme. Med Educ 2003 37 (Suppl 1 42 9.
8. Reynolds A, Ayres-de-Campos D, Bastos LF, van Meurs WL, Bernardes J. Impact of labour & delivery simulation classes in undergraduate medical learning. Med Educ Online [Serial online] 2008 13 : 14. Available at : http://www.med-ed-online.org/pdf/Res00285.pdf. Accessed 27 November 2008.
9. LeFlore JL, Anderson M, Michael JL, Engle WD, Anderson J. Comparison of self-directed learning versus instructor-modeled learning during a simulated clinical experience. Sim Healthcare 2007 2 : 170 7.
10. Gordon JA, Shaffer DW, Raemer DB, Pawlowski J, Hurford WE, Cooper JB. A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based teaching versus traditional instruction in medicine: a pilot study among clinical medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2006 11 : 33 9.
11. Nyssen AS, Larbuisson R, Janssens M, Pendeville P, Mayné A. A comparison of the training value of two types of anesthesia simulators: computer screen-based and mannequin-based simulators. Anesth Analg 2002 94 : 1560 5.
12. Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. The use of clinical simulations in assessment. Med Educ 2003 37 (Suppl 1) : 65 71.
13. Kneebone RL, Nestel D, Vincent C, Darzi A. Complexity, risk and simulation in learning procedural skills. Med Educ 2007 41 : 808 14.