Error estimation of closed-form solution for annual rate of structural collapse

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 37, Issue 15, 2008, Pages 1721-1737

  Bradley, Brendon A ^a   Dhakal, Rajesh P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Annual rate of collapse; Deaggregation; Ground motion hazard; Performance based earthquake engineering (PBEE); Performance based seismic design (PBSD)

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; CIVIL ENGINEERING; EARTHQUAKES; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; SAFETY ENGINEERING; STEEL STRUCTURES;

ANNUAL RATE OF COLLAPSE; DEAGGREGATION; GROUND MOTION HAZARD; PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING (PBEE); PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN (PBSD);

SEISMIC DESIGN;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 61749089846     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.833     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Federal Emergency Management Agency. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
2. Federal Emergency Management Agency. NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. FEMA-302, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
3. SAC Joint Venture. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. FEMA-350, SAC Joint Venture, Washington, DC, 2000.
4. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of building. FEMA-356, Washington, DC, 2000.
5. SEAOC. Vision 2000: A Framework for Performance-based Design. Structural Engineers Association of California: Sacramento, 1995.
6. Kennedy RP, Short SA. Basis for Seismic Provisions of Doe-Std-1020. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1994.
7. Cornell CA. Reliability-based earthquake-resistant design - the future. Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, 1996.
8. Shome N, Cornell CA. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. Report No. RMS-35, RMS Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1999.
9. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128:526-533.
10. Zareian F, Krawinkler H. Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36:1901-1914.
11. Mackie KR, Stojadinovic B. Performance-based seismic bridge design for damage and loss limit states. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36:1953-1971.
12. Aslani H, Miranda E. Probability-based seismic response analysis. Engineering Structures 2005; 27:1151-1163.
13. Bradley BA, Dhakal RP, Cubrinovski M, Mander JB, MacRae GA. Improved seismic hazard model with application to probabilistic seismic demand analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36:2211-2225.
14. Aslani H, Miranda E. Delivering improved information on seismic performance through loss deaggregation. Eighth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA, 2006; Paper no. 1126.
15. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA. Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1999; 89:501-520.
16. Baker JW, Cornell CA, Tothong P. Disaggregation of seismic drift hazard. Ninth International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR09), Rome, Italy, 2005.
17. Ang AHS, Tang WH. Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Vol. I - Basic Principles. Wiley: New York, 1975.
18. Jalayer F. Direct probabilistic seismic analysis: implementing non-linear dynamic assessments. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2003; 173.
19. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:491-514.
20. Mander JB, Dhakal RP, Mashiko N, Solberg KM. Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges. Engineering Structures 2007; 29:2662-2672.
21. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Applied incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2004; 20:523-553.
22. Ibarra LF, Krawinkler H. Global Collapse of Frame Structures Under Seismic Excitations. University of California at Berkeley: Berkeley, CA, 2005.
23. Stirling MW, McVerry GH, Berryman KR. A new seismic hazard model for New Zealand. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2002; 92:1878-1903.
24. Baker JW, Cornell CA. A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and eplison. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:1193-1217.
25. Goulet CA, Haselton CB, Mitrani-Reiser J, Beck JL, Deierlein GG, Porter K, Stewart JP. Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building - from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36:1973-1997.
26. Luco N, Cornell CA. Seismic drift demands for two SMRF structures with brittle connections. Structural Engineering World Wide. Elsevier: Oxford, England, 1998.
27. Tothong P, Luco N. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007; 36:1837-1860.
28. Luco N, Cornell CA. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 2007; 23:357-392.
29. Kennedy RP, Cornell CA, Campbell RD, Kaplan S, Perla HF. Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant. Nuclear Engineering and Design 1980; 59:315-338.
30. Haselton CB. Assessing collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2007.