An examination of determinants influencing the desire for and frequency of part-day and whole-day homeworking

Journal of Transport Geography

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 124-133

  Haddad, Hebba ^a   Lyons, Glenn ^a   Chatterjee, Kiron ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Homeworking; Part day homeworking; Telecommuting; Teleworking

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; MODELING; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; TELECOMMUTING; WORKPLACE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 61449162918     PISSN: 09666923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bagley M.N., and Mokhtarian P.L. Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting: modeling and policy implications. Transportation 24 (1997) 203-226
2. Bailyn L. Freeing work from the constraints of location and time. New Technology and Employment 3 (1988) 143-152
3. Baruch Y., and Nicholson N. Home sweet work: requirements for effective home working. Journal of General Management 23 (1997) 15-30
4. Beasley D.E., Lomo-David E., and Seubert V.R. Telework and gender: implications for the management of information technology professionals. Industrial Management and Data Systems 101 9 (2001) 477-482
5. Cairns, S., Sloman, L., Newson, C., Anable, J., Kirkbride, A., Goodwin, P., 2004. Smarter choices - changing the way we travel. Final Report to the Department of Transport, London, UK.
6. DfT, 2005. Focus on Personal Travel 2005 Edition.
7. Ellison N.B. Social impacts: new perspectives on tele-work. Social Science Computer Review 17 3 (1999) 338-356
8. Gatersleben B., and Uzzell D. Affective appraisals of the daily commute: comparing perceptions of drivers, cyclists, walkers and users of public transport. Environment and Behavior 39 (2007) 416
9. Golden T.D., Veiga J.F., and Zeki Simsek Z. Telecommuting's differential impact on work-family conflict: is there no place like home?. Journal of Applied Psychology 91 6 (2006) 1340-1350
10. Haddad, H., Lyons, G., 2008. An exploration of demographic, work, home and commute aspects of part-day and whole-day homeworking. Invited Paper Prepared for Third International Specialist Meeting on ICT, Everyday Life and Urban Change, March 2008, Bristol, UK.
11. Handy S.L., and Mokhtarian P.L. The future of telecommuting. Futures 28 (1996) 227-240
12. Helminen V., and Ristimäki M. Relationships between commuting distance, frequency and telework in Finland. Journal of Transport Geography 15 (2007) 331-342
13. Huws U., Korte W.B., and Robinson S. Telework: Towards the Elusive Office (1990), Wiley, Chicester
14. Iscan O.F., and Naktiyok A. Attitudes towards telecommuting: the Turkish case. Journal of Information Technology 20 (2005) 52-63
15. Jain J., and Lyons G. The gift of travel time. Journal of Transport Geography 16 (2008) 81-89
16. Jones, T., Lyons, G., 2005. Rationale for the design and implementation of a national longitudinal survey. Working Paper, Centre for Transport and Society, February, University of the West of England, Bristol.
17. Kaplan S. Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior 33 (2001) 480-506
18. Kaplan R., and Kaplan S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective (1989), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19. Lund J., and Mokhtarian P.L. Telecommuting and residential location: theory and implications for commute travel in the monocentric metropolis. Transportation Research Record 1463 (1994) 10-14
20. Lyons G., and Chatterjee K. A human perspective on the daily commute: costs, benefits and trade-offs. Transport Reviews 28 2 (2008) 181-198
21. Lyons, G., Haddad, H., 2008. Commute displacement or commute replacement: the rise of part-day homeworking. Paper presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January, Washington DC.
22. Lyons, G., Haddad, H., Jones, T., 2006. Introducing consideration of varied-spatiotemporal workers to the study of teleworking. In: Paper Presented at the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, August, Kyoto.
23. Mann S., Varey R., and Button W. An exploration of the emotional impact of teleworking via computer-mediated communication. Journal of Managerial Psychology 15 7 (2000) 668-690
24. Mannering J.S., and Mokhtarian P.L. Modelling the choice of telecommuting frequency in California: an exploratory analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 49 (1995) 49-73
25. Mokhtarian P.L. A synthetic approach to estimating the impacts of telecommuting on travel. Urban Studies 35 2 (1998) 215-241
26. Mokhtarian P., and Salomon I. Modeling the choice of telecommuting: setting the context. Environment and Planning A 26 (1994) 749-766
27. Mokhtarian P.L., and Salomon I. Modelling the choice of telecommuting: 2. A case of the preferred impossible alternative. Environment and Planning A 28 (1996) 1859-1876
28. Mokhtarian P.L., and Salomon I. Modelling the choice of telecommuting: 3. Identifying the choice set and estimating binary choice models for technology-based alternatives. Environment and Planning A 28 (1996) 1877-1894
29. Mokhtarian P.L., and Salomon I. Modelling the desire to telecommute: the importance of attitudinal factors in behaviour models. Transportation Research A 31 1 (1997) 35-50
30. Mokhtarian P.L., Bagley M.N., and Salomon I. The impact of gender, occupation and presence of children on telecommuting motivations and constraints. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 (1998) 1115-1134
31. Nilles J.M. Making Telecommuting Happen (1994), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY
32. Olson M.H. Telework: practical experience and future prospects. In: Kraut R.E. (Ed). Technology and the Transformation of White Collar Work (1987), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 136-152
33. Olson M.H. Organisational barriers to telework. In: Korte W.B., Robinson S., and Steinle W.L. (Eds). Telework: Present Situation and Further Development of A New Form of Work Organisation (1988), Empirica, Bonn, Germany 77-100
34. Popuri, Y.D., Bhat, C.R., 2003. On modeling the choice and frequency of home-based telecommuting. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January, Washington DC.
35. Redmond L.S., and Mokhtarian P.L. The positive utility of the commute: modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount. Transportation 28 (2001) 179-206
36. Richter J. Crossing boundaries between professional and private life. In: Grossman H., and Lane C. (Eds). Experience, Meaning of Work in Women's Lives (1990), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 143-163
37. Schwartz M.A., and Scott B.M. Marriages and Families: Diversity and Change (2000), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
38. Standen P. The home/work interface. In: Daniels K., Lamond D.A., and Standen P. (Eds). Managing Telework (2000), Business Press, London 83-92
39. Standen P., Daniels K., and Lamond D. The home as a workplace: work-family interaction and psychological well-being in telework. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 4 4 (1999) 368-381
40. Stanek D.M., and Mokhtarian P.L. Developing models of preference for home-based and center-based telecommuting: findings and forecasts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 57 (1998) 53-74
41. Steward B. Changing times - the meaning, measurement and use of time in teleworking. Time and Society 9 1 (2000) 57-74
42. Walls, M., Safirova, E., Jiang, Y. (2006). What Drives Telecommuting? The Relative Impact of Worker Demographics, Employer Characteristics, and Job Types. Discussion Paper, Resources for the Future, October 2006.