The impact of gender, occupation, and presence of children on telecommuting motivations and constraints

Journal of the American Society for Information Science

Volumn 49, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1115-1134

  Mokhtarian, Patricia L ^a   Bagley, Michael N ^a   Salomon, Ilan ^b  

^a University of California Davis   (United States)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

GENDER;

TELECOMMUTING;

EID: 0032188326     PISSN: 00028231     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1998)49:12<1115::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-Y     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bagley, M. N., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (1997). Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting: Modeling and policy implications. Transportation, 24(3), 203-226.
2. Bielby, D. D., & Bielby, W. T. (1988). She works hard for the money: Household responsibilities and the allocation of work effort. American Journal of Sociology, 93(5), 1031-1059.
3. Bielby, W. T., & Bielby, D. D. (1989). Family ties: Balancing commitments to work and family in dual earner households. American Sociological Review, 54, 776-789.
4. Christensen, K. (1988). Women and home-based work: The unspoken contract. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
5. DeSanctis, G. (1984). Attitudes toward telecommuting: Implications for work-at-home programs. Information and Management, 7, 133-139.
6. DuBrin, A. J. (1991). Comparison of the job satisfaction and productivity of telecommuters versus in-house employees: A research note on work in progress. Psychological Reports, 68, 1223-1234.
7. Duxbury, L. E., Higgins, C. A., & Irving, R. H. (1987). Attitudes of managers and employees to telecommuting. INFOR, 25(3), 273-285.
8. Gordon, F. E. (1976, December). Telecommunications: Implications for women. Telecommunications Policy, 1, 68-74.
9. Gray, M., Hodson, N., & Gordon, G. (1993). Teleworking explained. New York: Wiley.
10. Hall, D. T. (1989, December). Moving beyond the "mommy track": An organization change approach. Personnel, 66(12), 23-29.
11. Handy, S. L. (1996, October). Non-work travel choices of women: Patterns, perceptions, and preferences. Paper presented to the Second National Conference on Women's Travel Issues, Baltimore, MD.
12. Handy, S. L., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (1996). Forecasting telecommuting: An exploration of methodologies and research needs. Transportation, 23, 163-190.
13. Hartman, R. I., Stoner, C. R., & Arora, R. (1991). An investigation of selected variables affecting telecommuting productivity and satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 6(2), 207-225.
14. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Peterson, R. D. (1957). Job attitudes: Review of research and opinion. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychological Service of Pittsburgh.
15. Katz, A. I. (1987). The management, control, and evaluation of a telecommuting project: A case study. Information and Management, 13, 179-190.
16. Lefkowitz, J. (1994). Sex-related differences in job attitudes and dispositional variables: Now you see them, . . . . Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 323-349.
17. Mahmassani, H. S., Yen, J.-R., Herman, R., & Sullivan, M. A. (1993). Employee attitudes and stated preferences toward telecommuting: An exploratory analysis. Transportation Research Record. 1413, 31-41.
18. Mannering, J. S., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (1995). Modeling the choice of telecommuting frequency in California: An exploratory analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 49(1), 49-73.
19. Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (1994). Modeling the choice of telecommuting: Setting the context. Environment and Planning A, 26(5), 749-766.
20. Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (1996a). Modeling the choice of telecommuting 2: A case of the preferred impossible alternative. Environment and Planning A, 28, 1859-1876.
21. Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (1996b). Modeling the choice of telecommuting 3: Identifying the choice set and estimating binary choice models for technology-based alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 28, 1877-1894.
22. Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (1997). Modeling the desire to telecommute: The importance of attitudinal factors in behavioral models. Transportation Research A, 31(1), 35-50.
23. Newman, S. (1989). Telecommuters bring the office home. Management Review, 78(12), 41-42.
24. Olson, M. H., & Primps, S. B. (1984). Working at home with computers: Work and nonwork issues. Journal of Social Issues, 40(3), 97-112.
25. Pazy, A., Salomon, I., & Pintzov, T. (1996). The impacts of women's careers on their commuting behavior: A case study of Israeli computer professionals. Transportation Research A, 30A(4), 269-286.
26. Pratt, J. H. (1984). Home teleworking: A study of its pioneers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 25, 1-14.
27. Riley, F., & McCloskey, D. W. (1996). GTE's experience with telecommuting: Helping people balance work and family. In M. Igbaria (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGCPR/SIGMIS Conference (April 11-13, Denver, CO, pp. 85-93). New York: ACM Press.
28. Risman, B. J., & Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1985). Technology as a social construct: The impact of telecommuting on family roles. Family Perspective, 19(4), 239-249.
29. Salomon, I. (in press). Social forecasting and technological change: The case of telecommuting as travel substitute. Transportation Research C.
30. Salomon, I., & Salomon, M. (1984). Telecommuting: The employee's perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 25(1), 15-28.
31. Schwartz, F. (1989, January-February). Management women and the new facts of life. Harvard Business Review, 65-76.
32. Shamir, B., & Salomon, I. (1985). Work-at-home and the quality of working life. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 455-464.
33. Tingey, H., Kiger, G., & Riley, P. J. (1996). Juggling multiple roles: Perceptions of working mothers. The Social Science Journal, 33(2), 183-191.
34. Tolbert, P. S., & Simons, T. (1994). The impact of working at home on career outcomes of professional employees. Working paper 94-04, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.