Learn to use and use to learn: Technology in virtual collaboration experience

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 45-52

  Karpova, Elena ^a   Correia, Ana Paula ^a   Baran, Evrim ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Global team; Teamwork; Technology; Virtual collaboration

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

COLLABORATIVE PROCESS; COMPLEX PROBLEMS; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; GLOBAL LEARNING; GLOBAL TEAM; TEAMWORK; TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS; TIME DIFFERENCES; UNIVERSITY CURRICULUM; VIRTUAL COLLABORATION;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 61449158771     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ahern T., Thomas J., Tallent-Runnels M., Lan W., Cooper S., Lu X., and Cyrus J. The effect of social grounding on collaboration in a computer-mediated small group discussion. The Internet and Higher Education 9 1 (2006) 37-46
2. Beers P.J., Boshuizen H.P.A., Kirschner P.A., and Gijselaers W.H. Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior 21 4 (2005) 623-643
3. Billet S. Understanding workplace learning: Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives. In: Boud D. (Ed). Current issues and new agendas in workplace learning (1998), NCVER, Adelaide
4. Colbeck C., Campbell S., and Bjorklund S. Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects. The Journal of Higher Education 71 1 (2000) 60-83
5. Correia A.P. Team conflict in ICT-rich environments: Roles of technologies in conflict management. British Journal of Educational Technology 39 1 (2008) 18-35
6. Correia, A. P. (2008b). Moving from theory to real-world experiences in an e-learning community. Innovate, 4(4). Retrieved May 12, 2008, from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=495
7. Correia A.P., Baran E., and Yusop F. Designing cross-border online collaborative learning experiences. In: Montgomerie C., and Seale J. (Eds). Proceedings of ED-MEDIA World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hyper media & Telecommunications 2007 (2007), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Chesapeake, VA 1769-1778
8. Correia A.P., and Davis N.E. The design of collaboration in the virtual classroom. In: Simonson M. (Ed). 30th Annual Proceedings of Selected Papers on the Practice of Educational Communications and Technology (2007) 84-87 Anaheim, CA
9. Correia A.P., and Karpova E. Trust and performance in virtual teams. In: Simonson M. (Ed). 30th Annual Proceedings of Selected Papers on the Practice of Educational Communications and Technology (2007) 88-90 Anaheim, CA
10. Davis N.E., and Cho M. Intercultural competence for future leaders of educational technology and its evaluation. Interactive Educational Multimedia 10 (2005) 1-22
11. Delport R., and De Villers C. Determinants and effects of CMC in information science learning. 10th International Conference on Technology Supported Learning and Training (2004), Online Educa Berlin, Berlin 94-97
12. Finegold A., and Cooke L. Exploring the attitudes and dynamics of interaction in online groups. The Internet and Higher Education 9 3 (2006) 201-215
13. Grosse C. Managing communication within virtual intercultural teams. Business Communication Quarterly 65 4 (2002) 22-38
14. Gutwin C., and Greenberg S. The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In: Salas E., and Fiore S.M. (Eds). Team cognition: Understating the factors that drive process and performance (2004), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 177-201
15. Häkkinen P., and Järvelä S. Sharing and constructing perspectives in web-based conferencing. Computers & Education 47 4 (2006) 433-447
16. Jarvenpaa S.L., and Leider D.E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science 10 6 (1999) 790-815
17. Johnson D., and Johnson R. Joining together: Group theory and group skills. (8th ed.) (2003), Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA
18. Kristof A.L., Brown K.G., Sims H.P., and Smith K.A. The virtual team: A case study and inductive model. In: Beyerlein M.M., Johnson D.A., and Beyerlein S.T. (Eds). Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Knowledge work in teams (1995), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT 229-253
19. Kuure L., Saarenkunnas M., and Taalas P. A model for web-based collaborative project-learning languages at work. In: De Bra P., and Leggett J.J. (Eds). Proceedings of WebNet 99. World Conference on the WWW and Internet Vol. 2 (1999), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, VA 1320-1321
20. Leinonen P., Järvelä S., and Häkkinen P. Conceptualizing the awareness of collaboration: A qualitative study of a global virtual team. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 14 4 (2005) 301-322
21. Leinonen P., Järvelä S., and Lipponen L. Individual students' interpretations of their contribution to the computer-mediated discussions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 14 1 (2003) 99-122
22. Liebig H., and Effelsberg W. Computer-supported Formation of Virtual Learning Groups based on Proficiency Levels. In: Cantoni L., and McLoughlin C. (Eds). Proceedings of ED-MEDIA World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hyper media & Telecommunications (2004), Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Chesapeake, VA 1171-1178
23. Mezgar I. Trust in virtual organizations. In: Dasgupta S. (Ed). Encyclopedia of virtual communities and technologies (2005), Idea Group Reference, London 452-456
24. Pershing J., Kim J., Correia A., and Tom R. Evaluation & change management: Challenges and successes of a cross-cultural team. Proceedings of 2001 International Performance Improvement Conference (2001), International Society for Performance Improvement, Silver Spring, MD
25. Song L., Singleton E., Hill J., and Koh M. Improving on-line learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education 7 1 (2004) 59-70
26. Spiggle S. Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1994) 491-501
27. Sproull L., and Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science 32 11 (1986) 1492-1512
28. Thompson C., Locander W., and Pollio H. The lived meaning of free choice: An existential-phenomenological description of everyday consumer experiences of contemporary married women. Journal of Consumer Research 17 (1990) 346-361
29. Weller M., Pegler C., and Mason R. Use of innovative technologies on an e-learning course. Internet and Higher Education 8 1 (2004) 61-71
30. Wilson J.M., Straus S.G., and McEvily B. All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 99 1 (2006) 16-33